Linking Birth and Infant Death Records With Assisted Reproductive Technology Data: Massachusetts, 1997–1998
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Objectives: To link data from the US assisted reproductive technology (ART) registry with the Massachusetts birth–infant death file to create a comprehensive dataset on the circumstances surrounding conception and maternal and infant outcomes for a population of ART-conceived infants. Methods: The authors sought to link data for 3704 ART-conceived live-born infants from 2703 deliveries in 1997–1998 involving Massachusetts resident mothers who gave birth in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, or Connecticut to their corresponding Massachusetts birth record using a two-stage algorithm. Maternal and infant dates of birth served as the primary linkage variables. Maternal names for a subset of the ART-conceived infants were obtained and used in the second stage of the algorithm to confirm a sample of records that matched in Stage I, to resolve duplicate matches, and to link unmatched records. Results: In Stage I, 78% of ART deliveries matched with only one Massachusetts record, 2% matched with two records, and 20% remained unmatched. Overall, the complete algorithm using maternal name data for a portion of records yielded an 89% linkage rate. Nearly all of the records that matched during Stage I that were evaluated with maternal name data in Stage II were confirmed as correctly linked. Conclusions: This project confirms that high-yield data linkage can be achieved in the absence of specific identifiers (e.g., name and social security number). Nonetheless, additional matches were achieved when name data were obtained. This linkage creates the first population-based file in the US capturing detailed information on ART births.
- Medical Research International, The American Fertility Society Special Interest Group. In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in the United States: 1985 and 1986 results from the national IVF/ET registry. Fertil Steril 1988;49:212–5.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2002 assisted reproductive technology success rates. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004.
- Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Martin JA, Jeng G, Macaluso M. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997–2000. Pediatrics 2003;111:1159–62.
- The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2000:15;1856–64. CrossRef
- Kiely JL. What is the population-based risk of preterm birth among twins and other multiples? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998;41:3–11. CrossRef
- Martin JA, Park MM. Trends in twin and triplet births: 1980–97. Nat Vital Stat Rep 1999;47(24):1–16.
- Pharoah PO, Cooke T. Cerebral palsy and multiple births. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996;75:F174–7. CrossRef
- Senat MV, Ancel PY, Bouvier-Colle MH, Breat G. How does multiple pregnancy affect maternal mortality and morbidity? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998;41:78–83. CrossRef
- Schieve LA, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Macaluso M, Reynolds MA, Wright VC. Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1144–53.
- Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2002;346:731–7. CrossRef
- Perri T, Chen R, Yoeli R, Merlob P, Orvieto R, Shalev Y, Ben-Rafael Z, Bar-Hava I. Are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity? J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:245–9. CrossRef
- Klemetti R, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Comparison of perinatal health of children born from IVF in Finland in the early and late 1990s. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2192–8. CrossRef
- Dhont M, De Sutter P, Ruyssinck G, Martens G, Bekaert A. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: A case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:688–95. CrossRef
- Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (FCSRCA), Pub L No. 102-493, October 24, 1992.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of assisted reproductive technology—United States, 1996 and 1998. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51:97–101.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Impact of multiple births on low birthweight—Massachusetts, 1989–96. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999;48:289–92.
- Schieve LA, Wilcox LS, Zeitz J, Jeng G, Hoffman D, Brzyski R, Toner J, Grainger D, Tatham L, Younger B. Assessment of outcomes for assisted reproductive technology: Overview of issues and the U.S. experience in establishing a surveillance system. In: Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD, (Eds.) Medical, ethical and social aspects of assisted reproduction. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2001:363–76.
- Liu S, Wen S. Development of record linkage of hospital discharge data for the study of neonatal readmission. Chronic Dis Can 1999;20(2):77–81.
- Howe GR. Use of computerized record linkage in cohort studies. Epidemiol Rev 1998;20:112–21.
- Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, Jeng G. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance- United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 2005;54:1–24.
- Linking Birth and Infant Death Records With Assisted Reproductive Technology Data: Massachusetts, 1997–1998
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Volume 10, Issue 2 , pp 115-125
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- birth certificates
- data linkage
- death certificates
- reproductive technology
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- 4. CDC Mailstop E-86, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA
- 2. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA