The Naivasha language policy: the language of politics and the politics of language in the Sudan
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This article provides a textual analysis of the Naivasha language provisions in Sudan in an attempt to explore how political discourse is manifested in each policy statement. Using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as an analytic and interpretive framework, the article argues that the Naivasha language provisions as political discourse are shaped by the historically mediated relationships between the south and north of Sudan (conceptualized as the territorially united entity before the secession of the south in 2011). In the course of the analysis, the article shows that the discourse of ‘linguistic indigenousness’ promoted by the policy is ideologically motivated. It is intertextual with the colonial Southern Policy and subsequently the discourse of self-determination as legislated in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 that has recently heralded the emergence of the southern Sudan as a new nation-state. The analysis has shown that there is a high degree of compatibility between the proposed structural system and the discourse of the language policy. This compatibility is achieved at the status planning level, yet its realization at the practical level remains to be assessed. The article concludes by arguing that a particular version of federalism seems to be the most appropriate political system advocated for in the implementation of this language policy.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Abdel-Rahim, M. (1965). Fourteen documents on the problem of the southern Sudan. Khartoum: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
- Ajulo, S. B. (1997). Myth and reality of law, language and international organisation in Africa: The case of African economic community. Journal of African Law, 41(1), 27–42. CrossRef
- Anderson, G. (2008). Federalism: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Beshir, M. O. (1968). The southern Sudan: Background to conflict. London: C. Hurst.
- Blommaert, J. (Ed.). (1999). Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Bob, A., & Wassara, S. (1989). The emergence of the organised political movement in southern Sudan 1946–1972. In M. A. Al-Safi (Ed.), The nationalist movement in the Sudan (pp. 295–321). Khartoum: University of Khartoum.
- Bugarski, R. (2004). Language policies in the successor states of former Yugoslvaia. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(2), 189–207. CrossRef
- Cantori, L. J., & Lowrie, A. (1992). Islam, democracy, the state and the west. Summary of a lecture and round-table discussion with Hasan Turabi. Middle East Policy, 1(3), 49–61. CrossRef
- Cobarrubias, J. (1983). Ethical issues in status planning. In J. Cobarrubias & J. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning (pp. 41–85). New York: Mouton Publishers.
- Dallmayr, F. (1984). Language and politics: Why does language matter to political philosophy? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
- Deng, F. (1995). War of visions: Conflict of identities in the Sudan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
- Duchene, A., & Heller, M. (Eds.). (2007). Discourses of endangerment: Ideology and interest in the defence of languages. London: Continuum.
- Ethnologue. (2010). http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=sudan.
- Fabian, J. (1986). Language and colonial power: The appropriation of Swahili in the former Belgian Congo 1880–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
- Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.
- Forsyth, M. (Ed.). (1989). Federalism and nationalism. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
- Gal, S. (1998). Multiplicity and contention among language ideologies: A commentary. In B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: practice and theory (pp. 317–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Garang J. (1992). The call for democracy in Sudan, edited and introduced by M. Khalid, 2nd edn. London: Keagan Paul International.
- Geis, M. L. (1987). The language of politics. New York: Springer.
- Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
- James, W. (2008). Sudan: Majorities, minorities, and language interactions. In A. Simpson (Ed.), Language & national identity in Africa (pp. 61–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8(2), 139–159. CrossRef
- Joseph, J. E. (2006). Language and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Joseph, J. E., & Taylor, T. (Eds.). (1990). Language ideologies. New York: Routledge.
- Keller, G. (1983). What can language planners learn from the Hispanic experience with corpus planning in the United States? In J. Cobarrubias & J. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning (pp. 253–265). New York: Mouton Publishers.
- Kloss, H. (1971). Language rights of immigrant groups. International Migration Review, 5, 250–268. CrossRef
- Lo Bianco, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) and language policy and planning (LPP): Constraints and applications of the critical in language planning. In T. Le, Q. Le, & M. Short (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 101–119). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
- Macías, R. F. (1979). Language choice and human rights in the United States. In J. E. Alatis & G. R. Tucker (Eds.), Georgetown university round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 86–101). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Mahmud, U. (1983). Arabic in the southern Sudan: History and spread of a pidgin-creole. Khartoum: FAL Advertising and Print Co.
- Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (Eds.). (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- May, S. (2001). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism, and the politics of language. Harlow: Pearson Education.
- McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Chen, L. (1976). Freedom from discrimination in choice of language and international human rights. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 1, 151–174.
- Miller, C. (2003). Linguistic policies and the issue of ethno-linguistic minorities in the Middle East. In A. Usuki & H. Kato (Eds.), Islam in the Middle Eastern studies: Muslims and minorities (pp. 149–174). JCAS symposium series 7, Osaka, Japan.
- O’Leary, B. (2001). An iron law of nationalism and federation? A (neo-Diceyian) theory of the necessity of a federal Staatsvolk, and of consociational rescue. Nations and Nationalism, 7(3), 273–296. CrossRef
- Pelinka, A. (2007). Language as a political category: The viewpoint of political science. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(1), 129–143. CrossRef
- Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Phillips, L., & Jørgensen, M. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
- Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.
- Ruiz, R. (1990). Official languages and language planning. In K. L. Adams & D. T. Brink (Eds.), Perspectives on official English: The campaign for English as the official language of the USA (pp. 11–24). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Sanderson, L., & Sanderson, N. (1981). Education, religion and politics in southern Sudan 1899–1964. London: Ithaca Press.
- Scarino, A., & Papademetre, L. (2001). Ideologies, languages, policies: Australia’s ambivalent relationship with learning to communicate in ‘other’ languages. In J. Lo Bianco & R. Wickert (Eds.), Australian policy activism in language and literacy (pp. 305–325). Melbourne: Language Australia.
- Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Sharkey, H. (2008). Arab identity and ideology in Sudan: The politics of language, ethnicity and race. African Affairs, 107(426), 21–43. CrossRef
- Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229. CrossRef
- Stevenson, R. C. (1971). The significance of the Sudan in linguistic research: Past, present and future. In Y. F. Hasan (Ed.), Sudan in Africa (pp. 11–25). Khartoum: Khartoum University Press.
- The Comprehensive peace agreement between the Government of the Republic of Sudan and the Sudan’s People’s Liberation Movement/Sudan People’s Liberation Army. (2005). Accessed August 24, 2010, from http://www.sd.undp.org/doc/CPA.pdf.
- Tollefson, J. W. (1981). Centralised and decentralised language planning. Language Problems and Language Planning, 5(2), 175–188. CrossRef
- Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.
- Tollefson, J. W. (2002). Conclusion: Looking outward. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education (pp. 327–337). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Tupas, T. R. (2003). History, language planners, and strategies of forgetting: The problem of consciousness in Philippines. Language Problems and Language Planning, 27(1), 1–25. CrossRef
- van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
- van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage publications.
- van Dijk, T. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(2), 359–383. CrossRef
- van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wickert, R. (2001). Politics, activism and processes of policy production: Adult literacy in Australia. In J. Lo Bianco & R. Wickert (Eds.), Australian policy activism in language and literacy (pp. 67–84). Melbourne: Language Australia.
- Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A sociological critique. London: Routledge.
- Woolard, K. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 3–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 55–82. CrossRef
- Wright, S. (2004). Language policy and language planning: From nationalism to globalisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Young, J. (2005). John Garang’s legacy to the peace process, the SPL/A and the south. Review of African Political Economy, 32(106), 535–548. CrossRef
About this Article
- The Naivasha language policy: the language of politics and the politics of language in the Sudan
Volume 10, Issue 1 , pp 1-18
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Naivasha language policy
- Language rights
- Politics of language
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Clare Hall College, University of Cambridge, Herschel Road, Cambridge, CB3 9AL, UK
- 2. Department of Applied Linguistics and African & African American Studies, College of the Liberal Arts, Pennsylvania State University, 305 Sparks Building, State College, PA, 16801, USA