A market of accents Authors Open Access
First Online: 16 April 2009 Received: 24 April 2008 Accepted: 12 February 2009 DOI:
Cite this article as: Blommaert, J. Lang Policy (2009) 8: 243. doi:10.1007/s10993-009-9131-1 Abstract
This paper describes the cultural semantics of internet courses in American accent. Such courses are offered by corporate providers to specific groups of customers: people in search of success in the globalized business environment. The core of such courses is an order of indexicality which stresses uniformity and homogeneity, producing an invisible accent that replaces existing ‹foreign’ (i.e. authentic, biographic) accents. It is a new form of commodified dialectology, which differs quite substantially from common state and academic attitudes towards dialects and accents. The procedures used by such private providers are instances of language policing aimed at the infinitely small stuff of language: pronunciation. They show the interplay of different institutional actors in producing language norms within a globalized environment, and they raise issues of subjectivity and agency.
Keywords Internet Accent American Globalization Language policing Download to read the full article text References
Agha, A. (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment.
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology,
, 38–59. doi:
Agha, A. (2007).
Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Appadurai, A. (1996).
Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Barthes, R. (1957).
Mythologies. Paris: Le Seuil.
Blommaert, J. (2005).
Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity.
Journal of Multicultural Discourses,
(2), 115–130. doi:
Bourdieu, P. (1991).
Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity.
Castells, M. (1996).
The rise of the network society. London: Blackwell.
de Swaan, A. (2001).
Words of the world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Elmes, S. (2005).
Talking for Britain: A journey through the nation’s dialects. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Fairclough, N. (2006).
Language and globalisation. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2006).
The hermeneutics of the subject. London: Palgrave.
Foucault, M. (2007).
Security, territory, population. London: Palgrave.
Fukuyama, F. (1992).
The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
Graddol, D. (2006).
English next: Why global English may mean the end of ‹english as a foreign language. London: British Council.
Pennycook, A. (2007).
Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London: Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (1992).
Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, R. (2003).
English-only Europe? London: Routledge.
Silverstein, M. (1996). Monoglot ‹standard’ in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In D. Brenneis & R. Macaulay (Eds.),
The matrix of language (pp. 286–306). Boulder: Westview.
Silverstein, M. (2003a). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.
Language & Communication,
, 193–229. doi:
Silverstein, M. (2003b).
Talking politics: The substance of style from Abe to ‹W’. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Silverstein, M. (2006). Old wine, new ethnographic lexicography.
Annual Review of Anthropology,
, 481–496. doi:
Williams, E. (2006).
Bridges and barriers: Languages in African education and development. Manchester: StJerome.