Abstract
This paper introduces a generalized version of inquisitive semantics, denoted as GIS, and concentrates especially on the role of disjunction in this general framework. Two alternative semantic conditions for disjunction are compared: the first one corresponds to the so-called tensor operator of dependence logic, and the second one is the standard condition for inquisitive disjunction. It is shown that GIS is intimately related to intuitionistic logic and its Kripke semantics. Using this framework, it is shown that the main results concerning inquisitive semantics, especially the axiomatization of inquisitive logic, can be viewed as particular cases of more general phenomena. In this connection, a class of non-standard superintuitionistic logics is introduced and studied. These logics share many interesting features with inquisitive logic, which is the strongest logic of this class.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The reason why the words “local” and “global” are used in this context will be clarified later.
Medvedev logic is defined at the end of this section.
I am grateful to Nick Bezhanishvili for informing me of these two theorems.
References
Aiello, M., van Benthem, J., & Bezhanishvili, G. (2003). Reasoning about space: the modal way. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 889–920.
Alexandroff, P. (1937). Diskrete Räume. Matematicheskii Sbornik, 2, 501–519.
Ciardelli, I. (2009). Inquisitive semantics and intermediate logics. MSc thesis, Amsterdam.
Ciardelli, I., & Roelofsen, F. (2011). Inquisitive logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40, 55–94.
Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2013). Inquisitive semantics: a new notion of meaning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7, 459–476.
Chargov, A., & Zakharyaschev, M. (1992). Modal companions of intermediate propositional logics. Studia Logica, 51, 49–82.
Chargov, A., & Zakharyaschev, M. (1997). Modal logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
de Lavalette, G., Hendriks, L, & de Jongh, D. (2012). Intuitionistic implication without disjunction. Journal of Logic and Computation, 22, 375–404.
van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., & Kooi, B. (2008). Dynamic epistemic logic. Dordrecht: Springer.
Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2009). Inquisitive Semantics and Pragmatics. In Larrazabal, J., & Zubeldia, L. (Eds.) Meaning, Content, and Argument: Proceedings of the ILCLI International Workshop on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Rhetoric. Available at www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics.
Maksimova, L. (1986). On maximal intermediate logics with the disjunction property. Studia Logica, 45, 69–75.
Medvedev, J.T. (1962). Finite problems. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 3, 227–230.
Miglioli, P., Moscato, U., Ornaghi, M., Quazza, S., & Usberti, G. (1989). Some results on intermediate constructive logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 30, 543–562.
Punčochář, V. (2012). Some modifications of Carnap’s modal logic. Studia Logica, 100, 517–543.
Roelofsen, F. (2013). Algebraic foundations for the semantic treatment of inquisitive content. Synthese, 190, 79–12.
Schurz, G. (2001). Rudolf Carnap’s modal logic. In Stelzner, W., & Stöckler, M (Eds.) Zwischen traditioneller und moderner Logik. Nichtklassische Anstze. Paderborn: Mentis.
Stalnaker, R. (1999). Context and content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tarski, A. (1938). Der Aussagenkalkül und die Topologie. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 31, 103–134.
Väänänen, J. (2008). Modal Dependence Logic. In Apt, K.R., & van Rooij, R (Eds.) New perspectives in logic and interaction (pp. 237–254). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
van Dalen, D. (2001). Intuitionistic logic. In Gobble, L. (Ed.) The Blackwell guide to philosophical logic (pp. 224–257). Oxford: Blackwell.
Yang, F. (2014). On extensions and variants of dependence logic. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki.
Zakharyaschev, M. (1994). A new solution to a problem of Hosoi and Ono. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 35, 450–457.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work on this paper was supported by grant no. 13-21076S of the Czech Science Foundation. I am also grateful to Ivano Ciardelli and the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Punčochář, V. A Generalization of Inquisitive Semantics. J Philos Logic 45, 399–428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9379-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9379-1