Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 679–695

Gödelizing the Yablo Sequence

Open AccessArticle

DOI: 10.1007/s10992-012-9244-4

Cite this article as:
Cieśliński, C. & Urbaniak, R. J Philos Logic (2013) 42: 679. doi:10.1007/s10992-012-9244-4


We investigate what happens when ‘truth’ is replaced with ‘provability’ in Yablo’s paradox. By diagonalization, appropriate sequences of sentences can be constructed. Such sequences contain no sentence decided by the background consistent and sufficiently strong arithmetical theory. If the provability predicate satisfies the derivability conditions, each such sentence is provably equivalent to the consistency statement and to the Gödel sentence. Thus each two such sentences are provably equivalent to each other. The same holds for the arithmetization of the existential Yablo paradox. We also look at a formulation which employs Rosser’s provability predicate.


IncompletenessOmega-liarYablo’s paradoxParadoxProvabilityArithmeticGoedel
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and JournalismGdansk UniversityGdanskPoland
  3. 3.Centre for Logic and Philosophy of ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium