Hereby explained: an event-based account of performative utterances
- Regine Eckardt
- … show all 1 hide
Several authors propose that performative speech acts are self-guaranteeing due to their self-referential nature (Searle 1989; Jary 2007). The present paper offers an analysis of self-referentiality in terms of truth conditional semantics, making use of Davidsonian events. I propose that hereby can denote the ongoing act of information transfer (more mundanely, the utterance) which thereby enters the meaning of the sentence. The analysis will be extended to cover self-referential sentences without the adverb hereby. While self-referentiality can be integrated in ordinary truth conditional semantic analysis without being a mystery, the resulting account shows that self-referentiality in this sense is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for performative utterances. I propose that the second ingredient of performative utterances consists in an act of the speaker defining her utterance to be an act of the respective kind. The final theory can successfully predict the performativity, or lack thereof, of a wide range of performative sentences, and leads to an explicated interface between compositional sentence meaning and speech act.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Astington, J. (1988). Children’s understanding of the speech act of promising. Journal of Child Language, 15, 57–173.
- Austin, J. L. 1955 . In J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà (Eds.), How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon (1962).
- Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Boston: MIT Press.
- Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1992). How performatives really work: A reply to Searle. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 93–110. CrossRef
- Beaver, D., & Condoravdi, C. (2007). On the logic of verbal modification. In M. Aloni, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of 16th AC (pp. 3–10). University of Amsterdam.
- Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60(1), 1–29. CrossRef
- Bloom, P. (1998). Theories of artifact categorization. Cognition, 66(1), 87–93. CrossRef
- Champollion, L. (2010). Parts of a whole. PhD dissertation, Stanford.
- Condoravdi, C., & Lauer, S. (2010). Speaking of preferences. Imperative and desiderative assertions in context. Extended handout, Lichtenberg Kolleg Göttingen, June 2010 (available on author’s homepage).
- Condoravdi, C., & Lauer, S. (2011). Performative verbs and performative acts. Talk presented at Sinn und Bedeutung 15, September 9–11, 2010, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken. Handout available at authors’ homepages.
- Copley, B. A. (2002). The semantics of the future. PhD dissertation, MIT.
- Davidson, D. (1980). The logical form of action sentences. In D. Davidson (Ed.), Essays on actions and events (pp. 105–122). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Boston: MIT Press.
- Eckardt, R. (2009). Easy linking logic. In M. Aloni, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Amsterdam colloquium 2009 (pp. 247–257). Extended version available at Semantics Archive.
- Eckardt, R. (2011). Hands up imperatives. In I. Reich (Ed.), Proceedings of SuB 15 (2010), Saarbrücken (pp. 209–223).
- Fodor, J. D., & Sag, I. (1982). Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 355–398. CrossRef
- Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–388. CrossRef
- Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.
- Jary, M. (2007). Are explicit performatives assertions? Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 207–234. CrossRef
- Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossRef
- Kaufmann, M. (2011). Interpreting imperatives. New York: Springer.
- Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. In H.-J. Eikemeyer & H. Rieser (Eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts (pp. 38–74). Berlin: de Gruyter.
- Kratzer, A. (1998). Scope or pseudo-scope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events in grammar (pp. 163–196). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossRef
- Kratzer, A. (2003/in prog.). The event argument and the semantics of verbs. Semantics Archive.
- Landman, F. (2000). Events and plurality. The Jerusalem lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Matthewson, L. (1999). On the interpretation of wide scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics, 7, 79–134. CrossRef
- Parsons, T. (1991). Events in the semantics of English. Boston: MIT Press.
- Portner, P. (2005). The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In Proceedings of SALT XIV. New York: CLC Publications.
- Portner, P. (2007). Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics, 15, 351–383. CrossRef
- Reichenbach, H. (1966). Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Free Press.
- Reinhart, T. (1997). Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 335–397. CrossRef
- Schwager, M. (2006/t.a.). Interpreting imperatives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Frankfurt/Main. With revisions, under contract with Springer (series: Studies in linguistics and philosophy).
- Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Searle, J. (1989). How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(3), 535–558.
- Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.
- Searle, J., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Szabolsci, A. (1982). Model theoretic semantics of performatives. In F. Kiefer (Ed.), Hungarian linguistics (pp. 515–536). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Tomasello. (2007). Why Apes don’t point. In R. Eckardt, et al. (Eds.), Variation, selection, development. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Truckenbrodt, H. (2009). Performatives and agreement. Ms, Humboldt University, Berlin.
- Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and speech acts. Volume I: Principles of language use. Volume II: Formal semantics of success and satisfaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- von Fintel, K., & Heim, I. (2007). Intensional semantics. Online lecture notes, MIT. Accessed March 2012 from http://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/classes/s08/semantics2/vonfintel+heim07.pdf.
About this Article
- Hereby explained: an event-based account of performative utterances
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Linguistics and Philosophy
Volume 35, Issue 1 , pp 21-55
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Truth conditional semantics
- Event semantics
- Speech acts
- Performative utterances
- Regine Eckardt (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany