- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Gillies, A.S. Linguist and Philos (2007) 30: 329. doi:10.1007/s10988-007-9018-6
- 183 Views
Orthodoxy has it that counterfactuals cannot be treated as strict conditionals. But there is a loophole: if the strictness is a function of context then maybe they can be so treated. I argue for a loophole analysis that treats ‘would’-counterfactuals as strict conditionals that are duals to ‘might’- counterfactuals. Most of the work lies in getting straight about the interaction between context and semantic value. I treat it as a general feature of the dynamics of conversational score.