Unarticulated Constituents Revisited
- Luisa Martí
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
An important debate in the current literature is whether “all truth-conditional effects of extra-linguistic context can be traced to [a variable at; LM] logical form” (Stanley, ‘Context and Logical Form’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 23 (2000) 391). That is, according to Stanley, the only truth-conditional effects that extra-linguistic context has are localizable in (potentially silent) variable-denoting pronouns or pronoun-like items, which are represented in the syntax/at logical form (pure indexicals like I or today are put aside in this discussion). According to Recanati (‘Unarticulated Constituents’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 25 (2002) 299), extra-linguistic context can have additional truth-conditional effects, in the form of optional pragmatic processes like ‘free enrichment’. This paper shows that Recanati’s position is not warranted, since there is an alternative line of analysis that obviates the need to assume free enrichment. In the alternative analysis, we need Stanley’s variables, but we need to give them the freedom to be or not to be generated in the syntax/present at logical form, a kind of optionality that has nothing to do with the pragmatics-related optionality of free enrichment.
- Breheny R.: 2003a, ‘On Bindability’, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Breheny R.: 2003b, ‘A Lexical Account of Implicit (Bound) Contextual Dependence’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13, University of Washington, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.
- Cappelen, H., Lepore, E. (2002) ‘Indexicality, Binding, Anaphora and a priori Truth’. Analysis 62: pp. 271-81 CrossRef
- Carston, R. (2002) Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Blackwell, Oxford, UK
- Chierchia, G. (1993) ‘Questions with Quantifiers’. Natural Language Semantics 1: pp. 181-234 CrossRef
- Dayal V. (1997) ‘Free Relatives and Ever: Identity and Free Choice Readings’,Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 7, Stanford University, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.
- Dowty, D. (1978) ‘Lexically-Governed Transformations as Lexical Rules in a Montague Grammar’. Linguistic Inquiry 9: pp. 393-426
- Dowty, D. ‘Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar’. In: Jacobson, P., Pullum, G. eds. (1982a) The Nature of Syntactic Representation. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 79-130
- Dowty D.: 1982b, ‘Quantification and the Lexicon: A Reply to Fodor and Fodor’, in T. Hoekstra H. van der Hulst and M. Moortgat (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules, pp. 79–106, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
- Engdahl, E. (1986) Constituent Questions. Reidel, Dordrecht
- von Fintel K. (2000) ‘Whatever’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 10, Cornell University, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.
- Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: (1983) ‘Interrogative Quantifiers and Skolem Functions’, in K. Ehlich and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text, Tilburg Studies in Language and Literature 4, pp. 71–110, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Jacobson, P. (1995) ‘On the Quantificational Force of Free Relatives’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 451–86, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
- Martí, L. (2003) Contextual Variables, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
- McConnell-Ginet, S. (1982) ‘Adverbs and Logical Form’. Language 58: pp. 144-84 CrossRef
- Mitchell, J. (1986) The Formal Semantics of Point of View. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
- Parsons, T. (1990) Events in the Semantics of English. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
- Partee, B.: (1989) ‘Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 25 (Part One: The General Session), pp. 342–365, University of Chicago, The Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, IL.
- Perry, J. (1993) The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
- Perry, J. (1998) ‘Indexicals, Contexts, and Unarticulated Constituents’, in D. Westerståhl et al. (eds.), Computing Natural Language, pp. 1–11, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
- Recanati, F. (2002) ‘Unarticulated Constituents’. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: pp. 299-345 CrossRef
- Recanati, F. (2003) Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
- Stanley, J. (2000) ‘Context and Logical Form’. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: pp. 391-434 CrossRef
- Stanley, J., Szabó, Z. (2000) ‘On Quantifier Domain Restriction’. Mind and Language 15: pp. 219-61 CrossRef
- Taylor, K. (2001) ‘Sex, Breakfast, and Descriptus Interruptus’. Synthese 128: pp. 45-61 CrossRef
- Wilson, D., Sperber, D. (2000) ‘Truthfulness and Relevance’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: pp. 215-54
- Unarticulated Constituents Revisited
Linguistics and Philosophy
Volume 29, Issue 2 , pp 135-166
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Luisa Martí (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Linguistics (CASTL), Universitetet i Tromsø, NO-9037, Tromsø, Norway