Albert, D., & Schrepp, M. (1999). Structure and design of an intelligent tutorial system based on skill assignments. In J. Lukas (Ed.), Knowledge spaces: Theories, empirical research and applications (pp. 179–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Baker, J. W. (2000, April). The “classroom flip”: Using web course management tools to become a guide by the side. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on college teaching and learning, Jacksonville, FL.
Bluic, A.-M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education,
Buerck, J. P., Malmstrom, T., & Peppers, E. (2003). Learning environments and learning styles: Non-traditional student enrollment and success in an internet-based versus a lecture-based computer science course. Learning Environments Research,
Chandra, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2009). Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research,
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Collins, B., de Boer, W., & van der Veen, J. (2001). Building on learner contributions: A web-supported pedagogic strategy. Educational Media International,
Doignon, J. P., & Falmagne, J. C. (1999). Knowledge spaces
. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Donnelly, R. (2010). Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning. Computers & Education,
Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2001). An invasion in the classroom: Influence of an ill-structured innovation on instructional and epistemological beliefs. Learning Environments Research,
Falmagne, J. C. (1993). Stochastic learning paths in a knowledge structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology,
Falmagne, J. C., Cosyn, E., Doignon, J. P., & Thiery, N. (2006). The assessment of knowledge, in theory and in practice. In R. Missaoui & J. Schmid (Eds.), Formal concept analysis
(pp. 61–79). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research,
Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., & Dennis, N. C. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment at universities and colleges. Studies in Higher Education,
Frederickson, N., Reed, P., & Clifford, V. (2005). Evaluating web-supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education,
Gannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., & Helmick, M. T. (2008). Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. Proceedings of the 30th international conference on software engineering, Leipzig, Germany.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education,
Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education,
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education,
Lukas, J., & Albert, D. (1999). Knowledge structures: What they are and how they can be used in cognitive psychology, test theory, and the design of learning environments. In J. Lukas (Ed.), Knowledge spaces: Theories, empirical research, and applications (pp. 3–12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moos, R. H. (1974). The social climate scales: An overview. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Moss, R. H. (2003). Social contexts: Transcending their power and their fragility. American Journal of Community Psychology,
Nijhuis, J. F., Segers, M. S., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Influence of redesigning a learning environment on student perceptions and learning strategies. Learning Environments Research,
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Pelto, P. J., & Pelto, G. H. (1978). Anthropological research: The structure of inquiry
(2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education,
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Strayer, J. F. (2009). Inverting the classroom: A study of the learning environment when an intelligent tutoring system is used to help students learn. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
Weinstein, M. (2004). Randomized design and the myth of certain knowledge: Guinea pig narratives and cultural critique. Qualitative Inquiry,
Wolcott, H. F. (2005). The art of fieldwork (2nd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.