Landscape Ecology

, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp 863–877

Joint effects of habitat configuration and temporal stochasticity on population dynamics

  • Jennifer M. Fraterrigo
  • Scott M. Pearson
  • Monica G. Turner
Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10980-009-9364-6

Cite this article as:
Fraterrigo, J.M., Pearson, S.M. & Turner, M.G. Landscape Ecol (2009) 24: 863. doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9364-6

Abstract

Habitat configuration and temporal stochasticity in the environment are recognized as important drivers of population structure, yet few studies have examined the combined influence of these factors. We developed a spatially explicit simulation model to investigate how stochasticity in survival and reproduction influenced population dynamics on landscapes that differed in habitat configuration. Landscapes ranged from completely contiguous to highly fragmented, and simulated populations varied in mean survival probability (0.2, 0.4, 0.8) and dispersal capacity (1, 3, or 5 cells). Overall, habitat configuration had a large effect on populations, accounting for >80% of the variation in population size when mean survival and dispersal capacity were held constant. Stochasticity in survival and reproduction were much less influential, accounting for <1–14% of the variation in population size, but exacerbated the negative effects of habitat fragmentation by increasing the number of local extinctions in isolated patches. Stochasticity interacted strongly with both mean survival probability and habitat configuration. For example, survival stochasticity reduced population size when survival probability was high and habitat was fragmented, but had little effect on population size under other conditions. Reproductive stochasticity reduced population size irrespective of mean survival and habitat configuration, but had the largest effect when survival probability was intermediate and habitat was well connected. Stochasticity also enhanced the variability of population size in most cases. Contrary to expectations, increasing dispersal capacity did not increase population persistence, because the probability of finding suitable habitat within the dispersal neighborhood declined more for the same level of dispersal capacity when fragmentation was high compared to when it was low. These findings suggest that greater environmental variability, as might arise due to climate change, is likely to compound population losses due to habitat fragmentation and may directly reduce population size if reproductive output is compromised. It may also increase variability in population size.

Keywords

Climate changeColonizationDemographyFragmentationLife historyMetapopulationsPlantsReproductive outputSpatially explicit modelSurvival

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer M. Fraterrigo
    • 1
  • Scott M. Pearson
    • 2
  • Monica G. Turner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural SciencesMars Hill CollegeMars HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA