Landscape Ecology

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 27–40

Do corridors promote dispersal in grassland butterflies and other insects?

Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9167-6

Cite this article as:
Öckinger, E. & Smith, H.G. Landscape Ecol (2008) 23: 27. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9167-6


Ecological corridors are frequently suggested to increase connectivity in fragmented landscapes even though the empirical evidence for this is still limited. Here, we studied whether corridors, in the form of linear grass strips promote the dispersal of three grassland butterflies, using mark-recapture technique in an agricultural landscape in southern Sweden. We found no effects of the presence of corridors or of corridor length on inter-patch dispersal probabilities. Instead, dispersal probabilities appeared to be related to the quality, areas and population densities of the source and recipient patches. For two of the species, the density of captured individuals along corridors was better predicted by the corridor length than by the straight-line distance from a pasture, suggesting that short-distance movements within habitat patches result in a diffusion of individuals along corridors. A literature review revealed that only 16 published studies had explicitly studied the effect of corridors on insect movement. The context in which studies were performed appeared to affect whether corridors facilitated dispersal or not. All seven studies where the corridors consisted of open areas surrounded by forest showed positive effects, while only two out of six studies where corridors consisted of grassland surrounded by other open habitats showed positive effects of corridors. Our results clearly demonstrate that corridors do not always have positive effects on insect dispersal and that the effect seems to depend on the quality of the surrounding matrix, on the spatial scale in which the study is performed and on whether true dispersal or routine movements are considered.


Connectivity Habitat quality Lepidoptera Linear elements Mark-release-recapture Movement 

Supplementary material

10980_2007_9167_MOESM1_ESM.doc (179 kb)
(DOC 179 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EcologyLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations