High-Risk Interrogation: Using the “Mr. Big Technique” to Elicit Confessions
Kassin et al. (Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendation, 2009) provide a detailed and thoughtful analysis of how police interrogation practices might elicit false confessions from innocent suspects. The purpose of this commentary is to provide a brief review of a relatively recent development in Canadian police investigation practice and discuss how this procedure may increase the likelihood of police-induced false confessions. The so-called “Mr. Big Technique” is a non-custodial interrogation tactic wherein suspects are drawn into a supposed criminal organization (actually an elaborate police sting) and subsequently told that to move up in the organization, they must confess to a crime. In this article, we describe this remarkable interrogation technique and discuss issues relevant to the potential induction of false confessions.
- Gardner, C. (2004, February). R.C.M.P. clarify & defend the “Mayerthorpe Mister Big” operation. RCMP Watch. Retrieved from http://www.rcmpwatch.com/rcmp-clarify-defend-the-mayerthorpe-mister-big-operation/.
- Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2009). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/85vh322j085784t0/?p=e9ebc0e4afcb401e87a4c97fc5cda8a3&pi=3.
- Kassin, S. M., & McNall, K. (1991). Police interrogations and confession: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 233–251. CrossRef
- Lassiter, G. D., & Geers, A. L. (2004). Bias and accuracy in the evaluation of confession evidence. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 197–214). New York: Kluwer.
- Moore, T. E., Copeland, P., & Schuller, R. (in press). Deceit, betrayal and the search for truth: Legal and psychological perspectives on the ‘Mr. Big’ strategy. Criminal Law Quarterly.
- R. v. Bonisteel. (2008). BCCA 344.
- R. v. Boudreau. (2009). NSSC 30.
- R v. Hodgson. (1998). 2 S.C.R. 449.
- R. v. Mentuck. (2000). MBQB 155.
- R. v. Osmar. (2007). ONCA 50.
- Sands, A. (2005). Mountie sued by former suspect now heads Sherwood Park detachment, Edmonton Sun, January 20, 2005. Retrieved from http://www.injusticebusters.com/05/Steinke_Gary.shtml.
- Smith, S. M., Stinson, V., & Patry, M. W. (2009). The Mr. Big Technique: Successful innovation or dangerous development in the Canadian legal system? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 168–193. CrossRef
- High-Risk Interrogation: Using the “Mr. Big Technique” to Elicit Confessions
Law and Human Behavior
Volume 34, Issue 1 , pp 39-40
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- False confession
- Police undercover operations
- Mr. Big undercover operation