Alterman, A. I., Cacciola, J. S., & Rutherford, M. J. (1993). Reliability of the Revised Psychopathy Checklist in substance abuse patients. Psychological Assessment, 5
Amenta, A. (2005). The assessment of sexual offenders for civil commitment proceedings: An analysis of report content. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Sam Houston State University.
Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87
Boccaccini, M. T., & Brodsky, S. L. (2002). Believability of expert and law witnesses: Implications for trial consultation. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 33
Borum, R., Otto, R., & Golding, S. (1993). Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 21, 35–76.
Brodsky, S. L. (1991). Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer.
Campbell, T. (2004). Assessing sex offenders: Problems and pitfalls. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Campbell, T. (2006).The validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in adversarial proceedings. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655–665.
Cornell, D. G. (1987). Role conflict in forensic clinical psychology: A reply to Arcaya. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 18
DeMatteo, D., & Edens. J. F. (2006). The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991–2004). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12
Doren, D. M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitment and beyond. London: Sage Publications.
Edens, J., Marcus, D., Lilienfeld, S., & Poythress, N. (2006). Psychopathic, not psychopath: Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115
Gacono, C., & Hutton, H. (1994). Suggestions for the clinical and forensic use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R). International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 17
Garb, H. N., & Boyle, P. (2003). Understanding why some clinicians use pseudoscientific methods: Findings from research on clinical judgment. In S.O. Lilienfeld, S.J. Lynn, & J. M. Lohr (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. (pp. 17–38). New York. Guilford.
Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, Florida: Professional Resources Press.
Hans, V. P. (1986). An analysis of public attitudes towards the insanity defense. Criminology, 24
Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised – Second Edition. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
Hemphill, J. F., Templeman, R., Wong, S., & Hare, R. D. (1998). Psychopathy and crime: Recidivism and criminal careers. In D. Cooke, A. Forth, & R. Hare, (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research, and implications for society (pp. 375–398). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and newconvictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28
Lally, S. J. (2003). What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 5
Marcus, D. K., John, S., & Edens, J. F. (2004). A taxometric analysis of psychopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1
Miller, H. A., Amenta, A. E., & Conroy, M. A. (2005). Sexually violent predator evaluations: Empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions. Law and Human Behavior, 29
, 29– 54.CrossRefPubMed
Murrie, D. C., & Warren, J. I. (2005).Clinician variation in rates of legal sanity opinions: Implications for self-monitoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36
Murrie, D.C., Marcus, D.K., Douglas, K.S., Salekin, R.T., Lee, Z., & Vincent, G., (in press). Youth with psychopathy features are not a discrete class: A taxometric analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Otto, R. K. (1989). Bias and expert testimony of mental health professionals in adversarial proceedings: A preliminary investigation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7
Otto, R. K. (2006). Discussion of the Forensic Specialty Guidelines. St. Petersburg, Florida: Panel presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society.
Otto, R. K., & Heilbrun, K. (2002). The practice of forensic psychology: A look toward the future in light of the past. American Psychologist, 57
Patrick C. (Ed.) (2006). Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford.
Porter, S., Woodworth, M., Earle, J., Drugge, J., & Boer, D. P. (2003). Characteristics of violent behavior exhibited during sexual homicides by psychopathic and non-psychopathic murderers. Law and Human Behavior, 27
Rogers, R. (1987). Ethical dilemmas in forensic evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 5
Rutherford, M., Cacciola, J. S., Alterman, A. I., McKay, J. R., & Cook, T. G. (1999). The 2–year test-retest reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in methadone patients. Assessment, 6
Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist and psychopathy checklist-revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3
Schlank A. (Ed.) (2001). The sexual predator: Legal issues, clinical issues, special populations (2nd Ed). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute, Inc.
Shalverson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Shuman, D. W., & Greenberg, S. A. (2003). The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartiality and advocacy. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 34
Silver, E., Cirincione, C., & Steadman, H. (1994). Demythologizing inaccurate perceptions of the insanity defense. Law and Human Behavior, 18
Texas Health & Safety Code § 841.000 – 841.150 (2000).
Walsh, T., & Walsh, Z. (2006). The evidentiary introduction of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised
assessed psychopathy in U.S. courts: Extent and Appropriateness. Law and Human Behavior, 30
Winick, B. J., & LaFond, J. Q. (2003). Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.