Law and Human Behavior

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 109–115

On Lie Detection “Wizards”


DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9016-1

Cite this article as:
Bond, C.F. & Uysal, A. Law Hum Behav (2007) 31: 109. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9016-1

M. O’Sullivan and P. Ekman (2004) claim to have discovered 29 wizards of deception detection. The present commentary offers a statistical critique of the evidence for this claim. Analyses reveal that chance can explain results that the authors attribute to wizardry. Thus, by the usual statistical logic of psychological research, O’Sullivan and Ekman's claims about wizardry are gratuitous. Even so, there may be individuals whose wizardry remains to be uncovered. Thus, the commentary outlines forms of evidence that are (and are not) capable of diagnosing lie detection wizardry.


deception detection

Copyright information

© American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychology Association 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA
  2. 2.Middle Eastern Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyTexas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA