Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 297–300

Rolf Niedergerke (1921–2011): a life in muscle research


DOI: 10.1007/s10974-012-9326-5

Cite this article as:
Miller, D.J. J Muscle Res Cell Motil (2012) 33: 297. doi:10.1007/s10974-012-9326-5


This obituary provides some detail and background to the life and work of a pioneer of muscle physiology, Rolf Niedergerke, who died in December 2011 aged 90. His name is perhaps most widely known for his role in the discovery of the sliding filament mechanism of muscle contraction in collaboration with Andrew Huxley (which complemented the independent studies of HE Huxley and Jean Hanson). His other major contributions were to the ‘calcium story’ of muscle activation, particularly for the heart. In a long career, his intellectual and experimental excellence contributed some keystones of our present understanding of the role of cellular Ca2+ in muscle contraction and cardiac excitation–contraction coupling and of the Ca–Na exchange process.


Obituary Calcium-sodium antagonism Excitation-contraction coupling Cardiac muscle Sliding filament mechanism Calcium fluxes Heart muscle Calcium-sodium exchange Cardiac action potential 

Rolf Niedergerke (Photo by Martin Rosenberg © The Physiological Society)

Rolf Niedergerke, a pioneer of muscle physiology, died on 27 December 2011 aged 90. He is perhaps most widely known for his role in the discovery of the sliding filament mechanism of muscle contraction. His other major contributions were to the ‘calcium story’ of muscle activation, particularly for cardiac muscle. He retained a reserved personality throughout his long scientific life, notably eschewing many opportunities he had to present his work at conferences or through review articles. His scrupulous attendance to the limitations of experimental work resulted in publications that were full of detail and insightful caveats but were often challenging for his readers. He was reluctant to speculate beyond what he felt the data permitted. Despite a long and active career, he published fewer than 50 papers. To present-day workers this will seem a modest total. However, ten of his works have each been cited more than 100 times (at an average of 275 by March 2012). The case can be made that his work was more influential than even this impressive citation rate attests.

Rolf was born on 30 April 1921 at Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany. He studied medicine throughout the Second World War, mainly at Freiburg University before receiving his MD at the Charles University, Prague in 1945. As a future medical officer, he had been exempted from military service. In 1945, he was briefly imprisoned by invading Russian troops before escaping to continue clinical practice in his home city. He started his scientific work in 1947 at the Physiological Institute, Göttingen under Hermann Rein, studying the electrical activity of nerve fibres. First, he had to build an electrophysiological rig, despite the shortage of electronic equipment in post-war Germany. This provided him with invaluable experience of practical electronics. (It has been remarked that the electronics workshop in Göttingen was excellent but, at that time, rather preoccupied with building radios for the black market). He studied diphasic action potentials and conduction velocity in sciatic frog nerves. The friendship between Hermann Rein and Alexander von Muralt in Bern, Switzerland, led Rolf to work in the Theodor Kocher Institute there. Robert Stämpfli taught him how to dissect single myelinated fibres. Rolf worked partly with Stämpfli and Eduard Coraboeuf on the effects of CO2, pH and Ca2+ on the threshold potential and rheobase of isolated nodes of Ranvier.

Around 1951, Andrew Huxley changed his research interest from nerve to muscle and constructed an interference microscope specifically to reinvestigate the striation pattern of living skeletal fibres. Stämpfli recommended Rolf to him as an ideal collaborator for the technical challenges ahead. Moreover, Rolf was already familiar with the work of the early German microscopists on skeletal muscle striation patterns. By 1954, Huxley and Niedergerke could show that the anisotropic (‘A’) bands, that contain the myosin filaments, do not change length during active shortening, or during passive stretch. They concluded that this observation “… makes very attractive the hypothesis that during contraction the actin filaments are drawn into the A-bands, between the rodlets of myosin. … If a relative force between actin and myosin is generated at each of a series of points in the region of overlap in such sarcomeres, then tension per filament should be proportional to the number in this zone of overlap”. This is an unequivocal statement of the sliding filament mechanism, the modern paradigm of muscle contraction. All these predictions for the mechanism were subsequently confirmed. Hugh Huxley and Jean Hanson, using quite different methods involving isolated myofibrils, X-ray diffraction, phase-contrast-and electron microscopy, had arrived at the same conclusion independently. The two groups published their result in consecutive notes in the same issue of Nature (22nd May 1954). The ‘birth of the sliding filament concept’ (Maruyama 1995) was a revolution in muscle research and ultimately for the study of cellular motility overall. Nature celebrated the 50th anniversary of these papers (in 2004). Huxley and Niedergerke’s detailed work was not fully reported until 1958.

On the heels of this seminal work, Rolf briefly reported the application of Ca2+ via an intracellular micropipette in single skeletal fibres observed under the interference microscope (Niedergerke, 1955). Brief electrophoretic injection of Ca2+ provoked localised shortening in the immediate vicinity of the electrode tip. He suggested that Ca2+ ions activate a link to contraction, perhaps acting specifically since neither K+ nor Mg2+ proved effective. These findings cemented prior work by Heilbrunn and Wiercinski (1947) who had used a cruder, pressure injection technique in cut, unrestrained fibre segments. Rolf’s pilot study was not followed up or reported in detail—partly because of limited experimental time on the critical interference microscope. However, this work indicated his new field of interest: the activation of contraction in muscle and the role of Ca2+. He worked almost exclusively on this topic to the end of his scientific career.

Rolf moved from Cambridge to London in 1955, joining the Biophysics Department at University College. A suggestion by Bernard Katz shifted Rolf’s interest from skeletal to cardiac muscle (see Niedergerke and Page, 1992). In this he was following a celebrated previous inhabitant of the same labs, Sydney Ringer (1835–1910), whose meticulous approach to science and reserved personality had much in common with Rolf. The peculiar sensitivity of cardiac muscle to any manipulation of bathing ionic conditions perhaps seemed to offer a tractable route to understanding ‘excitation–contraction coupling’ (Alexander Sandow’s term, coined in 1952) and the role of calcium.

Rolf initially used fine strips dissected from frog ventricle. He measured monophasic action potentials and isometric force making two important studies (1956a, b) of the relationship between membrane potential (Em), beat-rate, Ca2+ and contraction, including the use of high-K+ induced depolarisation to control Em.

Late in 1956, Hans-Christoph Lüttgau joined Rolf—also via the Physiological Institute in Bern—to address the role of Ca2+ in tension activation. They followed up work by Wilbrandt and Koller (1948), confirming that Ca2+ and Na+ affect contraction antagonistically. Both twitch and contracture tension proved to be a sigmoidal function of the solution’s [Ca2+]/[Na+]2 quotient. They suggested (1957, 1958) that Ca2+ and Na+ ions attach to a sarcolemmal binding site that, even in combination with either Ca2+ or Na+, bears net electric charge. When Ca2+-bound, this complex—assumed to move within the membrane during the action potential—might promote contraction. Rolf (working with EJ Harris 1957) also revealed that this mechanism generates transmembrane ion fluxes. By using 45Ca tracer, they showed net Ca2+ uptake by cells exposed to media of increased [Ca2+]/[Na+]2.

These findings, and the algebraic formalism developed to describe them, form keystones of subsequent work specifically characterising the Ca–Na exchange mechanism (CaNaX) started by Harald Reuter (Reuter and Seitz 1968). The algebraic description of receptor-based antagonism in the 1958 paper was further developed in part from an exchange of letters between Alan Hodgkin and Rolf. Hodgkin had broken his anonymity as the referee for the Journal of Physiology paper by suggesting a way of describing the voltage-sensitivity of Ca–Na antagonism in explicit terms, but added “I expect you have been considering much of this already” (Hodgkin 1958). (This model of voltage sensitivity was detailed by Lüttgau 1963 in Milan, Lüttgau, 1965). Subsequently, Miller and Moisescu (1976) provided a scheme to account for the ion fluxes and force production implicated in Ca–Na antagonism, sensu stricto. Finally, the phenomenon of Ca–Na antagonism has been described quantitatively in terms of the present-day model of the CaNaX mechanism by Miller and Smith 2010).

Rolf next analysed the influence of external [Ca2+] and [Na+], as well as beat rate, on 45Ca-tracer fluxes (Niedergerke 1963a, b). Then, with Dick Orkand, he focussed on the influence of Ca2+ on the overshoot of the action potential (1964). They distinguished any ‘indirect’ role of Ca2+ on other current-carriers (e.g. via surface charge effects) before concluding that Ca2+ itself must be a current-carrying ion that contributes to the action potential (Niedergerke and Orkand 1966a, b). (The role for Ca2+ ions as a current carrier was soon convincingly confirmed in voltage clamp experiments e.g. those by Beeler and Reuter 1970). Rolf’s Ca2+-flux and electrophysiological studies were followed by work on the dynamics of twitch-tension control by heart rate and extracellular Ca2+ (Chapman and Niedergerke 1970a, b).

Rolf then addressed a key concept of putative Ca–Na exchange mechanisms, namely whether intracellular [K+] and [Na+] might regulate the strength of the heartbeat (Gadsby et al. 1971). Their results did (and do) not fit easily with proposals concerning CaNaX that were emerging then, perhaps because few other studies directly address the dynamic control of tension (as observed in Ca–Na antagonism) as opposed to ion fluxes and considerations of steady-state intracellular ion concentrations (more directly concerning CaNaX).

In his only departure, post 1955, from studying the heart, Rolf’s 1977 paper with the two Davids—Gadsby and Ogden—addressed the electrogenic sodium pump in skeletal fibres. By this time, Rolf had already been collaborating for several years with Sally Page (e.g. Page and Niedergerke 1972), with whom most of his subsequent research was done. Various experimental and theoretical strands underpinned an interpretation of their wider-ranging functional studies on the actions of caffeine; adrenaline and ATP on the heart (see Niedergerke and Page 1981a, b).

Some sight of Rolf the man must not be lost in this description of his scientific life; Sally Page has reminded me that Rolf’s dry humour was a constant feature of his personality, often displayed in lab teaching and in private life. In his youth Rolf had played both flute and violin in chamber music groups: music might well have become his profession had the war and his medical studies not intervened. Music was to remain a life-long passion. Sally and Rolf travelled widely together, combining hill- and mountain-walking (Europe, Turkey, North Africa, Madeira) with exploring old towns and museums. In London, weekly museum and gallery visits, theatre and concerts provided Rolf’s relaxations together with walking, reading and music. As former colleague Don Jenkinson noted “those privileged to know him well came to appreciate his unobtrusive kindliness and the breadth of both his scholarship and interests (especially in European history and art).”

Rolf received the first Rudolf Buchheim Prize of the German Pharmacological Society and was made an Honorary Member of the Physiological Society in 1987, when he retired, becoming Emeritus Reader in Biophysics at UCL.

Over his career, Rolf Niedergerke was invited to a number of symposia, but he invariably declined. This characteristic reticence to push major findings was regretted, in particular by those keen to promote his career and his work. Otto Hutter has described this aspect of Rolf’s personality as the “principle-led disapproval of any form of self-promotion”. However, Rolf’s intellectual and experimental excellence contributed some keystones of our present understanding of the role of cellular Ca2+ in muscle contraction and cardiac EC coupling and of the Ca–Na exchange process, But he also contributed to a crowning achievement of cell physiology through his part in a collaboration that helped to reveal the sliding filament mechanism of muscle contraction.

Rolf Niedergerke at the dissection table. (Photo courtesy of Sally Page)


I wish to express my gratitude to Hans-Christoph Lüttgau who collaborated with me in an earlier version of this article written for Physiology News and the longer, linked version available via the Physiological Society’s website. I am also indebted to Sally Page who provided many key facts about Rolf Niedergerke’s life, as well as her personal reflections on his character and life outside science.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations