Skip to main content
Log in

Climate Change Professional Development: Design, Implementation, and Initial Outcomes on Teacher Learning, Practice, and Student Beliefs

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 April 2016

Abstract

In this work, we present the design, implementation, and initial outcomes of the Climate Academy, a hybrid professional development program delivered through a combination of face-to-face and online interactions, intended to prepare formal and informal science teachers (grades 5–16) in teaching about climate change. The Climate Academy was designed around core elements of successful environmental professional development programs and aligned with practices advocated in benchmarked science standards. Data were collected from multiple sources including observations of professional development events, participants’ reflections on their learning, and collection of instructional units designed during the Academy. Data were also collected from a focal case study teacher in a middle school setting. Case study data included classroom observations, teacher interviews, and student beliefs toward climate change. Results indicated that the Climate Academy fostered increased learning among participants of both climate science content and pedagogical strategies for teaching about climate change. Additionally, results indicated that participants applied their new learning in the design of climate change instructional units. Finally, results from the case study indicated positive impacts on student beliefs and greater awareness about climate change. Results have implications for the design of professional development programs on climate change, a topic included for the first time in national standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Two teachers worked together and thus we collected 16 units from the 17 participants.

References

  • Andersson, B., & Wallin, A. (2000). Students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect, the societal consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and the problem of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1096–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., Houle, M., Mark, S. L., Minner, D., Hirsch, L., Strauss, E., … Hufnagel, B. (2014). Participatory professional development: Geospatially enhanced urban ecological field studies. In J. MaKinster, N. Trautmann, & M. Barnett (Eds.), Teaching science and investigating environmental issues with geospatial technology: Designing effective professional development for teachers (pp. 13–33). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The greenhouse effect: Children’s perception of causes, consequences, and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1994). The idea of secondary school children concerning ozone layer damage. Global Environmental Change, 4(5), 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1997). Children’s models of understanding of two major global environmental issues (ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science and Technology Education, 15, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2001). Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose? School students’ ideas about the “greenhouse effect” a decade on. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupigny-Girouz, L. L. (2010). Exploring the challenges of climate science literacy: Lessons from students, teachers and lifelong learners. Geography Compass, 4, 1203–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellins, K. K., Ledley, T. S., Haddad, N., McNeal, K., Gold, A., Lynds, S., & Libarkin, J. (2014). EarthLabs: Supporting teacher professional development to facilitate effective teaching of climate science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 330–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and its impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowda, M. V. R., Fox, J. C., & Magelky, R. D. (1997). Students’ understanding of climate change: Insights for scientists and educators. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(1), 2232–2240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. (2013). Formative assessment for Next Generation Science Standards: A proposed model. Princeton, NJ: K-12 Center at ETS. Retrieved from http://www.k12center.org/rsc/pdf/herman.pdf.

  • Hestness, E., McGinnis, J. R., Riedinger, K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2011). A study of teacher candidates’ experiences investigating global climate change within an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirabyashi, J. (2011). CLEAN pathways informant survey #1. Inverness, CA: Inverness Research Associates. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/.

  • Hodson, D. (2013). Don’t be nervous, don’t be flustered, don’t be scared: Be prepared. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13, 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holthuis, N., Lotan, R., Saltzman, J., Mastrandrea, M., & Wild, A. (2014). Supporting and understanding students’ epistemological discourse about climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 374–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (Eds.), Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.climatechange2013.org/report/full-report/.

  • Jickling, B. (2001). Climate change, global warming, and education with uncertainties. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. M. (2011). National earth science teachers’ association survey of the needs and concerns of K-12 earth and space science educators. Retrieved from http://www.nestanet.org/cms/sites/default/files/documents/ExecutiveSummaryClimateChangeEducationSurveyDecember2011.pdf.

  • Johnson, R. M., Henderson, S., Gardiner, L., Russell, R., Ward, D., Foster, S., … Eastburn, T. (2008). Lessons learned through our climate change professional development program for middle and high school teachers. Physical Geography, 29, 500–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., Shearon, E. L., Burgette, J. E., & Sivin-Kachala, J. (2012). Teaching climate change: Cumulative summary for the evaluation of PBS Teacher Line’s NASA Innovations in Climate Education online professional development. Retrieved from http://wwwtc.pbs.org/teacherline/courses/common_documents/research/pbs-cumulative-summary-final.pdf.

  • Kirk, K. (2011). Teaching environmental issues and the affective domain. Retrieved from http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/affective/environment.html.

  • Kubitskey, B. (2006). Extended professional development for systemic curriculum reform (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

  • Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 889–909). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynds, S. (2009). Inspiring climate education excellence program needs assessment survey report. Boulder: CIRES Education and Outreach, University of Colorado. Retrieved from http://cires.colorado.edu/files/9013/9577/9211/EO-ICEENeedsAssessmentReport.pdf.

  • Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Mertz C. K., & Akerlof, K. (2011). Global warming’s Six Americas screening tools: Survey instruments; instructions for coding and data treatment; and statistical program scripts. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://climatechangecommunication.org/SixAmericasManual.cfm.

  • Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. K. (2011b). Identifying like-minded audiences for climate change public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS One, 6(3), e17571. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2009). Global warming’s Six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/GlobalWarmingsSixAmericas2009c.pdf.

  • McGinnis, J. R., & Simmons, P. (1999). Teachers’ perspectives of teaching science–technology–society in local cultures: A sociocultural analysis. Science Education, 83, 179–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). Climate change education in formal settings, K-14: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruneau, D., Gravel, H., Courque, W., & Langis, J. (2003). Experimentation with a socio-constructivist process for climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 9, 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruneau, D., Moncton, U., Liboiron, L., & Vrain, E. (2001). People’s ideas about climate change: A source of inspiration for the creation of educational programs. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig, G., Campbell, K., Dalbotten, D., & Varma, K. (2012). CYCLES: A culturally-relevant approach to climate change education in native communities. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 6, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H. (2001). Defining teacher quality through content: Professional development implications from TIMSS. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Professional development planning and design (pp. 141–164). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association and National Science Education Leadership Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P., & Niyogi, D. (2012). An earth system science teacher professional development tool kit for climate science. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. Retrieved from http://iclimate.org/ccc/edu/static/workingMANUAL.pdf.

  • Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2009). Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15, 549–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Roychoudhury, A., & Hirsch, A. (2012). Conceptualizing climate change in the context of a climate system: Implications for climate and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18, 323–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sondergeld, T. A., Milner, A., & Rop, C. (2014). Evaluating teachers’ self-perceptions of their knowledge and practice after participation in an environmental education professional development program. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 18, 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S. B. (2010). Climate change in the classroom: Patterns, motivations, and barriers to instruction among Colorado science teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yale/George Mason. (2009). Global warming’s Six Americans: An audience segmentation analysis. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/climatechange-6americas.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chrystalla Mouza.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shea, N.A., Mouza, C. & Drewes, A. Climate Change Professional Development: Design, Implementation, and Initial Outcomes on Teacher Learning, Practice, and Student Beliefs. J Sci Teacher Educ 27, 235–258 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9456-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9456-5

Keywords

Navigation