Akerson, V. L. (2008). Using action research projects to help preservice elementary teachers effectively use interdisciplinary language arts and science instruction. In V. L. Akerson (Ed.), Interdisciplinary language arts and science instruction in elementary classrooms: Applying research to practice (pp. 279–293). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Akerson, V., & Young, T. A. (2008). Why research on interdisciplinary language arts and science instruction. Interdisciplinary language arts and science instruction in elementary classrooms: Applying research to practice (pp. 3–11). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baker, L. (1991). Metacognition, reading, and science education. In C. M. Santa & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Science learning: Processing and applications (pp. 2–13). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Baker, L. (2004). Reading comprehension and science inquiry: Metacognitive connections. In W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 239–257). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Baker, L., & Saul, W. (1994). Considering science and language arts connections: A study of teacher cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Barber, J., Catz, K. N., & Arya, D. (2006). Improving science content acquisition through a combined science/literacy approach: A quasi-experimental study. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Beck, I. L. & McKeown, M. G. (1989). Expository text for young readers: The issue of coherence. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 47–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
Bintz, W., & Moore, S. (2007). Using a literature-based text cluster to teach science. In V. L. Akerson (Ed.), Interdisciplinary language arts and science instruction in elementary classrooms: Applying research to practice (pp. 159–172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bransford, J., & National Research Council(U.S.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
Carter, G. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1978). Science and reading: A basic duo. The Science Teacher,
Casteel, C. P., & Isom, B. A. (1994). Reciprocal processes in science and literacy learning. The Reading Teacher,
Cervetti, G. N., Pearson, P. D., Bravo, M. A., & Barber, J. (2006). Reading and writing in the service of inquiry-based science. In R. Douglas, M. P. Klentschy, & K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the k-8 classroom (pp. 221–244). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Connor, C. M., Kaya, S., Luck, M., Toste, J. R., Canto, A., Rice, D., et al. (2010). Content area literacy: Individualizing student instruction in second-grade science. The Reading Teacher,
Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2001). Genre and other factors influencing teachers’ book selections for science instruction. Reading Research Quarterly,
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher,
Fang, Z., Lamme, L., Pringle, R., Patrick, J., Sanders, J., Zmach, C., et al. (2008). Integrating reading into middle school science: What we did, found and learned. International Journal of Science Education,
Fleener, C., & Bucher, K. (2003). Linking reading, science, and fiction books. Childhood Education,
French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,
Girod, M., & Twyman, T. (2009). Comparing the added value of blended science and literacy curricula to inquiry-based science curricula in two 2nd grade classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education,
Glynn, S. M., & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology,
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology,
Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., et al. (2003). Message from the “Island group”: What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case study of young children’s scientific inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,
International Reading Association, & National Council of Teachers of English. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Newark, DE and Urbana, IL: Authors.
Krajcik, J. S., & Sutherland, L. M. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science,
Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (2004). Learning from text designed to model scientific thinking in inquiry-based instruction. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspective on theory and practice (pp. 316–333). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Morrow, L., Pressley, M., Smith, J., & Smith, M. (1997). The effect of a literature-based program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly,
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers, (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education,
Osborne, J. (2002). Science without literacy: A ship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education,
Padilla, M. J., Muth, D., & Padilla, R. K. (1991). Science and reading: Many process skills in common? In C. M. Santa & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Science learning: Processing and applications (pp. 14–19). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Pearson, P., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science,
Rice, D. C. (2002). Using trade books in teaching elementary science: Facts and fallacies. The Reading Teacher,
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1992). A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications. International Journal of Science Education,
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2005). A knowledge-focused multi-part strategy for enhancing student reading comprehension proficiency in grade 5. San Antonio, Texas: In annual meeting of the International Reading Association.
Ross, D., & Frey, N. (2002). In a spring garden: Literacy and science bloom in second grade. Reading Improvement,
Routman, R. (1994). Invitations: Changing teachers and learners k-12. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Saul, E. W., & Dieckman, D. (2005). Choosing and using information trade books. Reading Research Quarterly,
Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L. D., & Anderson, J. O. (2004). Impact of a schools district’s science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third- and fourth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Simpson, R. D., Koballa, T. R., Oliver, J. S., & Crawley, F. E. (1994). Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 211–234). New York, NY: MacMillan Reference Books.
Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canady, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Varelas, M., & Pappas, C. C. (2006). Intertextuality in read-alouds of integrated science-literacy units in urban primary classrooms: Opportunities for the development of thought and language. Cognition and Instruction,
Vitale, M. R., & Romance, N. R. (2012). Using in-depth science instruction to accelerate student achievement in science and reading comprehension in grades 1–2. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,
Yore, L., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education,