Applying a Cognitive-Affective Model of Conceptual Change to Professional Development
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This study evaluated Gregoire’s (2003) Cognitive–Affective Conceptual Change model (CAMCC) for predicting and assessing conceptual change in science teachers engaged in a long-term professional development project set in a large school district in the southwestern United States. A multiple case study method with data from three teacher participants was used to understand the process of integrating and applying a reform message of inquiry based science teaching. Data sources included: responses to example teaching scenarios, reflective essays, lesson plans, classroom observations, and action research projects. Findings show that the CAMCC functioned well in predicting how these teachers made decisions that impacted how they processed the reform message. When the reform message was communicated in such a way as to initiate stress appraisal, conceptual change occurred, producing changes in classroom practice. If the reform message did not initiate stress appraisal, teachers rejected the professional development message and developed heuristic responses. In order to further research and improve practice, propositions for assessments related to the CAMCC are provided.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14. CrossRef
- Andre, T., & Windschitl, M. (2003). Interest, epistemological belief, and intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 173–197). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
- Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1998). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 521–539. CrossRef
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press.
- Cooney, T. J., Shealy, B. E., & Arvold, B. (1998). Conceptualizing belief structures of preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 306–333. CrossRef
- Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916–937. CrossRef
- Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.). Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Crippen, K. J., Biesenger, K. D., & Ebert, E. K. (in press). Using professional development to achieve classroom reform and science proficiency: An urban success story from southern Nevada. Professional Development in Education.
- Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2–3), 109–128. CrossRef
- Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671–688. CrossRef
- Feldman, A. (2000). Decision making in the practical domain: A model of practical conceptual change. Science Education, 84, 606–623. CrossRef
- Fetters, M. K., Czernizk, C. M., Fish, L., & Shawberry, J. (2002). Confronting, challenging, and changing teachers’ beliefs: Implications from a local systemic change professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 101–130. CrossRef
- Gill, M. G., Ahston, P., & Algina, J. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ epistemological beliefs about teaching and learning in mathematics: An intervention study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 164–185. CrossRef
- Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147–179. CrossRef
- Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
- Kang, N., Orgill, M., & Crippen, K. J. (2008). Understanding teachers’ conceptions of classroom inquiry with a teaching scenario survey instrument. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 337–354. CrossRef
- Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Appeldoorn, K. (2002). CETP core evaluation: Classroom observation handbook. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Loughran, J. J. (2007). Science teacher as learner. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1043–1065). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
- Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., et al. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1063–1080. CrossRef
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington: National Academy Press.
- Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.
- Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227. CrossRef
- Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a 6th-grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 669–692. CrossRef
- Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2007). Learning to teach science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1151–1178). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
- Schutz, P. A., Hong, J. Y., Cross, D. I., & Osborne, J. N. (2006). Reflections on investigation emotion in educational activity settings. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 343–360. CrossRef
- Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of intentions in conceptual change learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptualc change (pp. 1–18). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Taitelbaum, D., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Carmeli, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). Evidence for teachers’ change while participating in a continuous professional development programme and implementing the inquiry approach in the chemistry laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 593–617. CrossRef
- Yager, R. E. (2009). The centrality of inquiry for teaching and learning science. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Inquiry: The key to exemplary science: Vol. 6. Arlington: NSTA Press.
About this Article
- Applying a Cognitive-Affective Model of Conceptual Change to Professional Development
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Volume 21, Issue 3 , pp 371-388
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Conceptual change
- Professional development