American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education
, 13(1), 1–12.CrossRef
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Basista, B., Tomlin, J., Pennington, K., & Pugh, D. (2001). Inquiry-based integrated science and mathematics professional development program. Education, 121 15–624.
Bazler, Jw. A. (1991). A middle school teacher summer research project. Schoolscience and Mathematics
, 91, 322–324.CrossRef
Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from scienceeducation. London: Falmer Press.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education (3rded.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bonner, J. J. (2004). The biology of food. The Science Teacher, 71(8), 30–34.
Brickhouse, N., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
, 29, 471–485.CrossRef
Caton, E., Brewer, C., & Brown, F. (2000). Building teacher-scientist partnerships: Teaching about energy through inquiry. School Science and Mathematics, 100(1), 7–15.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for scienceteachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
, 37, 916–937.CrossRef
Eick, C. J., & Reed, C. J. (2002). What makes an inquiry-oriented science teacher? Theinfluence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice. Science Education
, 86, 401–416.CrossRef
Feldman, A. (2002). Multiple perspectives for the study of teaching: Knowledge, reason, understanding, and being. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
, 39, 1032–1055.CrossRef
Flick, L., Keys, C. W., Westbrook, S. L., Crawford, B. A., & Carnes, G. N. (1997, April). Perspectives on inquiry-oriented teaching practices: Conflict andclarification. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Scienceteaching, Oak Brook, IL.
Fullan, M. G., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gibbons, S., & Howard, K. (1997). Changing teacher behavior through staff development: Implementing the teaching and content standards in science. School Science andMathematics, 97, 302–310.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Harwood, W. S. (2004). An activity model for scientific inquiry. Thescience Teacher, January, 44–46.
Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professionaldevelopment: A new consensus. In G. Sykes (Ed.), Teaching as the Learningprofession. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Huberman, M. (1995). Networks that alter teaching: Conceptualizations, exchanges, andexperiments. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1, 193–211.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through staff development. ew York: Longman.
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science withteachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Scienceteaching
, 38, 631–645.CrossRef
Keys, C. W., & Kennedy, V. (1999). Understanding inquiry science teaching in context: Acase study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education
, 10, 315–353.CrossRef
Lehman, J. D., George, M., Rush, M., Buchanan, P., & Averill, M. (2000, April). Preparing teachers to use project-based science: Lessons from a four-year project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research inScience Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designingprofessional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: CorwinPress.
Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development forteachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science andMathematics, 99, 258–271.
Luft, J. A. (1999). Assessing science teachers as they implement inquiry lessons: Theextended inquiry observational rubric. Science Educator, 8(1), 9–18.
Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of aninquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondaryscience teachers. International Journal of Science Education
, 23, 517–534.CrossRef
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching andlearning. Stanford, CA: CRC.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications ineducation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Education Series.
Middendorf, J., & Pace, D. (2002). Overcoming cultural obstacles to new ways ofteaching: The Lilly Freshman Learning Project at Indiana University. To Improvethe Academy, 20, 208–224.
Nazier, G., Bell, G. L., West, K., & Chambers, S. (2002, April). Inquiry scienceprofessional development combined with a science summer camp for immediateapplication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association forResearch in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards forteaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature ofscience. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, andschool. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science educationstandards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Radford, D. L. (1998). Transferring theory into practice: A model for professionaldevelopment for science education reform. Journal of Research in Scienceteaching
, 35, 73–88.CrossRef
Reiff, R., Harwood, W. S., & Phillipson, T. (2002, January). A scientific methodbased upon research scientists’ conceptions of scientific inquiry.
Paper presented atthe meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Greenville, NC. Available at: http://www.ed.psu.edu/CI/Journals/2002aets/f3_reiff_harwood_p.rtf
Sandoval, W. A., Deneroff, V., & Franke, M. L. (2002, April). Teaching, aslearning, as inquiry: Moving beyond activity in the analysis of teaching practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Schwab, J. J. (1966). The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvarduniversity Press.
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development onscience teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Scienceteaching
, 37, 963–980.CrossRef
Thiessen, D. (1992). Classroom-based teacher development. In A. Hargreaves & M. G. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 85–109). New York: TeachersCollege Press.
Thompson, C. L., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 341–375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tobin, K. (2000). Interpretive research in science education. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enactedcurriculum. Science Education
, 80, 223–241.CrossRef
Welch, W. W., Klopfer, L. E., Aikenhead, G. S., & Robinson, J. T. (1981). The role ofinquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. Science Education
, 65, 33–50.CrossRef
Westerlund, J. F., Garcia, D. M., Koke, J. R., Taylor, T. A., & Mason, D. S. (2002). Summer scientific research for teachers: The experience and its effect. Journal ofScience Teacher Education
, 13, 63–83.CrossRef
Westerlund, J. F., & Stephenson, A. L. (2002). Phasing in future teachers: Amultidisciplinary teaching technique. Journal of College Science Teaching, 32, 171–175.
Woodbury, S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). Overcoming the paradox of change withoutdifference: A model of change in the arena of fundamental school reform. Educational Policy
, 16, 763–782.CrossRef
Zuckerman, J. T. (1996). Novice science teachers: Making the choice between coveringthe curriculum and fostering their students’ understanding. Science Educator, 5(1), 24–27.