Amir, E., & Lev, B. (1996). Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
Aspelund, A., Berg-Utby, T., & Skjevdal, R. (2005). Initial resources’ influence on new venture survival: A longitudinal study of new technology-based firms. Technovation,
Baptista, R., Karaöz, M., & Mendonça, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial backgrounds, human capital and start-up success, Jena Economic Research Papers, (pp. 1–39).
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,
Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics,
Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boeker, W. (1989). Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. The Academy of Management Journal,
Bollinger, L., Hope, K., & Utterback, J. M. (1983). A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms. Research Policy,
Bono, J. E., & McNamara, G. (2011). From the editors: Publishing in AMJ-Part 2: Research design. Academy of Management Journal,
Box, M. (2008). The death of firms: Exploring the effects of environment and birth cohort on firm survival in Sweden. Small Business Economics,
Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., Hart, M. M., & Haller, H. S. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base [and executive commentary]. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005),
Carayannis, E. G., Rogers, E. M., Kurihara, K., & Allbritton, M. M. (1998). High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. Technovation,
Cassia, L., De Massis, A., Meoli, M., & Minola, T. (2013). Entrepreneurship research centers around the world: Research orientation, knowledge transfer and performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–17.
Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal,
CIDEM. (2006). Support for entrepreneurs—Financing and subsidies. Centre for Innovation and Business Development.
Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing,
Clayman, B. P., & Holbrook, J. A. (2003). The survival of university spin-offs and their relevance to regional development. Vancouver: Canadian Foundation on Innovation.
Clayman, B. P., & Holbrook, J. A. (2004). Surviving spin-offs as a measure of research funding effectiveness (C. f. P. R. o. S. a. T. (CPROST), Trans.).
Cohen, W. (2000). Taking care of business. ASEE prism online, Jan 1–5.
Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy,
Colombo, M. G., Delmastro, M., & Grilli, L. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ human capital and the start-up size of new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization,
Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy,
Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders’ human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing,
Colombo, M. G., & Piva, E. (2012). Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups. Research Policy,
Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, F. J., & Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing,
Cressy, R. (1996). Are business startups debt-rationed? The Economic Journal,
Cressy, R. (2006). Why do most firms die young? Small Business Economics,
Criaco, G., Serarols-Tarres, C., Minola, T., Bhatiya, A. (forthcoming). Companies spun out of universities: Different typologies for different performance patterns. In F. Therin (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Techno-Entrepreneurship. Vol. 2. Edward Elgard.
Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2011). Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,
D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy,
De la Fuente, A., & Ciccone, A. (2002). Human capital in a global and knowledge-based economy (Vol. Final report). European commission.
De Massis, A. D., Minola, T., & Viviani, D. (2012). Entrepreneurial learning in Italian high-tech start-ups: An exploratory study. International Journal of Innovation and Learning,
De Tienne, D., & Cardon, M. (2012). Impact of founder experience on exit intentions. Small Business Economics,
De Tienne D., & Chirico, F. (forthcoming). Exit strategies in family firms: How socioemotional wealth drives the threshold of performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2006). Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organization,
Dencker, J. C., Gruber, M., & Shah, S. K. (2009). Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organization Science,
Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy,
Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research. The Journal of Technology Transfer,
EC. (2002). Innovation tomorrow. Innovation policy and the regulatory framework: Making innovation an integral part of the broader structural agenda. Innovation papers. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy,
Feeser, H. R., & Willard, G. E. (1990). Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms. Strategic Management Journal,
Ferguson, R., & Olofsson, C. (2004). Science parks and the development of NTBF—Location, survival and growth. Journal of Technology Transfer,
Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy,
Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2009). Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: An assessment of Italian founders’ incentives. The Journal of Technology Transfer,
Franklin, S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in University spin-out companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer,
Geroski, P. A., Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (2010). Founding conditions and the survival of new firms. Strategic Management Journal,
Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly,
Gimmon, E., & Levie, J. (2010). Founders’ human capital, external investment, and the survival of new high-technology ventures. Research Policy,
Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). Academics’ organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing,
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,
Grilli, L. (2010). When the going gets tough, do the tough get going? The pre-entry work experience of founders and high-tech start-up survival during an industry crisis. International Small Business Journal
Gupte, M. (2007). Success of university spin-offs. Network activities and moderating effects of internal communication and adhocracy. Kiel: Deutscher Universitats-Verlag.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Helm, R., & Mauroner, O. (2007). Success of research-based spin-offs. State-of-the-art and guidelines for further research. Review of Managerial Science,
Hsu, D. H. (2007). Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Research Policy,
IDESCAT. (2009). R&D, innovation and ICT. Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya.
Iacobucci, D., Iacopini, A., Micozzi, A., & Orsini, S. (2011). Fostering entrepreneurship in academic spin-offs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business,
Johansson, M., Jacob, M., & Hellström, T. (2005). The strength of strong ties: University spin-offs and the significance of historical relations. The Journal of Technology Transfer,
Kalleberg, A. L., & Leicht, K. T. (1991). Gender and organisational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success. Academy of Management Journal,
Knockaert, M., Wright, M., Clarysse, B., & Lockett, A. (2010). Agency and similarity effects and the VC’s attitude towards academic spin-out investing. The Journal of Technology Transfer,
Kroll, H., & Liefner, I. (2008). Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialisation in a transforming economy—Evidence from three universities in China. Technovation,
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower’s door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies. Research Policy,
Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy,
Lowe, R. A. (2002). Invention, innovation and entrepreneurship: The commercialization of university research by inventor founded firms. Berkley, Berkeley, California: University of California.
Lyles, M. A., Saxton, T., & Watson, K. (2004). Venture survival in a transitional economy. Journal of Management,
Meoli, M., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2013). Completing the technology transfer process: M&As of science-based IPOs. Small Business Economics,
Migliorini, P., Serarols, C., & Bikfalvi, A. (2010). Overcoming critical junctures in spin-off companies from non-elite universities: Evidence from Catalonia. In S. David, L. João, R. Mário & W. Friederike (Eds.), The theory and practice of entrepreneurship Frontiers in European entrepreneurship research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Minola, T., & Giorgino, M. (2011). External capital for NTBFs: the role of bank and venture capital. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management,
Mungai, E., & Velamuri, S. R. (2011). Parental entrepreneurial role model influence on male offspring: Is it always positive and when does it occur? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research,
Mustar, P. (1997). How French academics create hi-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure. Science and Public Policy,
Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., et al. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy,
Ndonzuau, F. N., Pirnay, F., & Surlemont, B. (2002). A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation,
Nerkar, A., & Shane, S. (2003). When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive? International Journal of Industrial Organization,
Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Social networks in organizationale: The university spinout phenomenon. Management Science,
Niosi, J. (2006). Success factors in Canadian academic spino. The Journal of Technology Transfer,
O’Shea, R., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: A conceptual framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer,
OECD. (2003). A proposed classification of ICT goods. OECD working party on indicators for the information society. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2005). A framework for biotechnology statistics. OECD working party of national experts on science and technology indicators. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009). OECD Guide to measuring the information society 2009. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2011). Biotechnology. OECD Factbook 2011–2012: Economic, environmental and social statistics. Paris: OECD.
Reynolds, P., Carter, N., Gartner, W., & Greene, P. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics,
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change,
Sandberg, W. R., & Hofer, C. W. (1987). Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing,
Serarols, C., Cayon, M., & Criaco, G. (2011). Factores de exito y financiacion de las spin-offs universitarias. ACCID Revista de Contabilidad y Dirección,
Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship. University spin-offs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science,
Shrader, R., & Siegel, D. S. (2007). Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology-based newv. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change,
Storey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction. Research Policy,
Strotmann, H. (2007). Entrepreneurial survival. Small Business Economics,
Thursby, J., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer,
Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2008). External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Venturing,
Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing,
Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N., & S’Jegers, R. (2006). Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: An examination of team heterogeneity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. The Academy of Management Review,
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy,
Walker, E., & Brown, A. (2004). What success factors are important to small business owners? International Small Business Journal,
Walske, J. M., & Zacharakis, A. (2009). Genetically engineered: Why some venture capital firms are more successful than others. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing,
Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences. Research Policy,
Westhead, P., & Storey, D. J. (1995). Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms. Omega,
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy,
Zhang, J. (2009). The performance of university spin-offs: An exploratory analysis using venture capital data. The Journal of Technology Transfer,