Ardac, D., and Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Baker, V. (2004). Beyond Appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas
. A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry. http://www.chemsoc.org/pdf/LearnNet/rsc/miscon.pdf
(accessed November 15, 2005).
Barak, M., and Dori, Y. J. (2005). Enhancing undergraduate students’ chemistry understanding through project-based learning in an IT environment. Science Education
Barnea, N. (2000). Teaching and learning about chemistry and modeling with a computer managed modeling system. In Gilbert, J. K., and Boulter, C. J. (Eds.), Developing Models in Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Barnea, N., and Dori, Y. J. (2000). Computerized molecular modeling: The new technology for enhancing model perception among chemistry educators and learners. ChemistryEducation: Research and Practice in Europe 1: 109–120.
Bates, P. E. (1978). The role o laboratory in secondary school science programs. In Rowe, M. B. (Ed.), What Research Says to the Science Teacher, National Science Teachers’ Association, Washington, DC, pp. 55–82.
Benson, D. L., Wittrock, M. C., and Baur, M. E. (1993). Students’ preconceptions of the nature of gases. Journal Of Research in Science Teaching
Blosser, P. E. (1983). What research says: The role of the laboratory in science teaching. School Science and Mathematics
Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogicaTM: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology
Carmichael, P. (2000). Computers and the development of mental models. In Gilbert, J. K., and Boulter, C. J. (Eds.), Developing Models in Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
de Jong, T., Martin, E., Zamarro, J. M. Esquembre, F., Swaak, J., and van Joolingen, W. R. (1999). The integration of computer simulation and learning support: An example from the physics domain of collisions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Ebenezer, J. V. (2001). A hypermedia environment to explore and negotiate students’ conceptions: Animation of the solution process of table salt. Journal of Science Education and Technology 10: 73–92.
Ebenezer, J. V., and Erickson, G. (1996). Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility. Science Education
Edelson, D. C. (1998). Realising authentic science learning through the adaptation of scientific practice. In Fraser, B. J., and Tobin, K. G. (Eds.), International Handbook of science education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherland, pp. 317–333.
Gabel, D. L. (1992). Modeling with magnets—A unified approach to chemistry problem solving. The Science Teacher, March, 58–63.
Gabel, D. L., and Bunce, D. M. (1994). Research on problem solving: Chemistry. In Gabel, D. L. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 301–325.
Gilbert, J. (Ed.) (2005). Visualization in Science Education, Kluwer Academic publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Gilbert, J. K., and Boutler, C. (Eds.) (2000). Developing Models in Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Gobert, J. (2000). A typology of causal models for plate tectonics: Inferential power and barriers to understanding. International Journal of Science Education
Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., and Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Harrison, A. G., and Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education
Hawkes, S. J. (2004). Chemistry is not a laboratory science. Journal of Chemical Education 81: 1257.
Hessley, R. K. (2004). A computational-modeling course for undergraduate students in chemical technology. Journal of Chemical Education 81: 1140–1144.
Horowitz, G., and Schwartz, G. (2004). Exploring organic mechanistic puzzles with molecular modeling. Journal of Chemical Education 81: 1136–1139.
Johnson, P. (1998) Progression in children’s understanding of a ‘basic’ particle theory: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education 20: 393– 412
Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and micro-chemistry. School Science Review 64: 377–379.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 7: 75–83.
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education 70: 701–705.
Justi, R., and Gilbert, J. K. (2002a). Models and modeling in chemical education. In Gilbert, J. K., de Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D. F., and van Driel, J. H. (Eds.), Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 47– 68.
Justi, R. S., and Gilbert, J. K. (2002b). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education
Karpen, M. E., Henderleiter, J., and Schaertel, S. A. (2004). Integrating computational chemistry into the physical chemistry laboratory curriculum: A web/dry lab approach. Journal of Chemical Education 81: 475–477.
Korfiatis, K., Papatheodorou, E., Stamou, G. P., and Paraskevopoulous, S. (1999). An investigation of the effectiveness of computer simulation programs as tutorial tools for teaching population ecology at university. International Journal of Science Education
21: 1269– 1280.CrossRef
Korkmaz, A., and Harwood, W. (2004). Web-supported chemistry education: Design of an online tutorial for learning molecular symmetry. Journal of Science Education and Technology
Kozma, R. B., and Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Lazarowitz, R., and Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In Gabel, D. L. (Ed.), The Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 94–128.
Lee, H. S., and Songer, N. B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education
Linn, M. C. (2003). Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education
Linn, M. C., and Muilenburg, L. (1996). Creating lifelong science learners: What models form a firm foundation? Educational Researcher
Metcalf, S. J., and Tinker, R. F. (2004). Probeware and handhelds in elementary and middle school science. Journal of Science Education and Technology
Monaghan, J. M., and Clement, J. (1999). Use of a computer simulation to develop mental simulation for understanding relative motion concepts. International Journal of Science Education
Nameroff, T. J., and Busch, D. H. (2004). Exploring the molecular vision: Report from a SOCED invitational conference. Journal of Chemical Education 81: 177–179.
Novick, S., and Nussbaum, J. (1978) Junior high school pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study. Science Education
Novick, S., and Nussbaum, J. (1981) Pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross-age study. Science Education
Pallant, A., and Tinker, R. F. (2004). Reasoning with atomic-scale molecular dynamic models. Journal of Science Education and Technology
Parr, C. S., Jones, T., and Songer, N. B. (2004). Evaluation of a handheld data collection interface for science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology
Songer, N. B. (1998). Can technology bring students closer to science? In Fraser, B. J., and Tobin, K. G. (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherland, pp. 333–248.
Snir, J., Smith, C. L., and Raz, G. (2003). Linking phenomena with competing underlying models: A software tool for introducing students to the particulate model. Science Education
Stewart, J., Cartier, J. L., and Passmore, C. M. (2005). Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In Donovan, S., and Bransford, J. D. (Eds.), How Students’ Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom, Committee on How People Learn, A Targeted Report for Teachers, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 515– 565.
Stewart, J., Hafner, R., Johnson, S., and Finkel, E. (1992). Science as model building: Computers and high-school genetics. Educational Psychologist
Stieff, M. (2004). Connected chemistry—A novel modeling environment for the chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education
Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., and Soloway, E. (1998). Secondary students’ dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing, reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems. Journal of Science Education and Technology 7: 215–234.
Taber, K. (2002). Chemical Misconceptions: Prevention, Diagnosis and Cure. Vol. II: Classroom Resources, Royal Society of Chemistry, London.
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., and Mamiala, T. L. (2002). Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., and Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In Gabel, D. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 177–210.
Westbrook, S. L., and Marek, E. D. (1991). A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Windschitl, M. (2000). Supporting the development of science Inquiry skills with special classes of software. Educational Technology Research and Development
Woodfield, B. F., Catlin, H. R., Waddoups, G. L., Moore, M. S., Swan, R., Allen, R., et al. (2004). The virtual chemlab project: A realistic and sophisticated simulation of inorganic qualitative analysis. Journal of Chemical Education 81: 1672–1678.
Wu, H.-K., and Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education