Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interpersonal Responses and Pain Management Within the US Military

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Chronic pain poses a significant problem for the US military. The benefits of self-management treatments for chronic pain are well-documented, but interpersonal responses also influence physical and psychological health and may not be addressed through self-management treatments alone. The current study examines whether perceived interpersonal responses to pain, as measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), change as a result of participation in an intensive pain management program. It was hypothesized that interpersonal responses to pain would be significantly correlated to psychosocial and physical pain outcomes and that interpersonal responses to pain would change significantly for completers of a functional restoration (FR) program compared to those who were randomized to treatment-as-usual in the military medical system. Methods Forty-four participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One treatment group received FR (n = 26) and the other group received treatment-as-usual (n = 18). Significant other responses to chronic pain were measured by the MPI (Pain 23(4):345–356, 1985). Participants also completed measures of impacted quality of life, reported disability, psychological distress, fear avoidance, pain interference, and physical activity. Results Perceived higher punishing responses from a significant other were significantly related to worse physical health-related quality of life (p = .037), work-related fear avoidance (p = .008), pain interference (p = .026), affective distress (p = .039), and pain while lifting (p = .017). Perceived higher solicitous responses from significant others were significantly associated with lower mental health-related quality of life (p = .011), household activity (p = 017), general activity (p = .042), self-reported disability (p = .030), lifting capacity (p = .005), and aerobic capacity (p = .009). Conclusions While findings are preliminary and of limited scope, it appears that the perception of significant others’ responses may be impacted by psychosocial and physical pain outcomes and may change after treatment. More work in this area is needed to uncover the benefits one might achieve when a significant other is included within the FR treatment framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain. 1985;23(4):345–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. US General Accounting Office. Veterans disability benefits: VA should improve its management of individual unemployability benefits by strengthening criteria, guidance, and procedures. Washington; 2006.

  3. Maloney P, McIntosh EG. Chronic low back pain and depression in a sample of veterans. Percept Mot Skills. 2001;92(2):348. doi:10.2466/PMS.92.2.348-348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman JB, Lehman CL, Elliott J, Clark J. Sleep quality and the role of sleep medications for veterans with chronic pain. Pain Med. 2006;7(2):105–14. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00110.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beckham JC, Crawford AL, Feldman ME, Kirby AC, et al. Chronic posttraumatic stress disorder and chronic pain in Vietnam combat veterans. J Psychosom Res. 1997;43(4):379–89. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00129-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lombardo ER, Tan G, Jensen MP, Anderson KO. Anger management style and associations with self-efficacy and pain in male veterans. J Pain. 2005;6(11):765–70. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trost Z, Vangronsveld K, Linton SJ, Quartana PJ, Sullivan ML. Cognitive dimensions of anger in chronic pain. Pain. 2012;153(3):515–7. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.10.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker WC, Fiellin DA, Gallagher RM, Barth KS, Ross JT, Oslin DW. The association between chronic pain and prescription drug abuse in veterans. Pain Med. 2009;10(3):531–6. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00584.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goebel JR, Compton P, Zubkoff L, et al. Prescription sharing, alcohol use, and street drug use to manage pain among veterans. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(5):848–58. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martie LM. The “relative” efficacy of involving family in psychosocial interventions for chronic illness: are there added benefits to patients and family members? Fam Syst Health. 2005;2005(23):312–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leonard M, Cano A. Pain affects spouses too: personal experience with pain and catastrophizing as correlates of spouse distress. Pain. 2006;126(1–3):139–46. doi:10.1016/j-pain.2006.06.022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cano A, Gillis M, Heinz W, Geisser M, Foran H. Marital functioning, chronic pain, and psychological distress. Pain. 2004;107:99–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gatchel RJ, McGeary DD, McGeary CA, Lippe B. Interdisciplinary chronic pain management: past, present, and future. Am Psychol. 2014;69(2):119–130. Available from: PsycINFO, Ipswich, MA. Accessed Apr 3 2015 [serial online].

  14. Turk DC, Okifuji A. Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(3):678–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gatchel RJ, McGeary DD, Peterson A, et al. Preliminary findings of a randomized controlled trial of an interdisciplinary military pain program. Mil Med. 2009;174(3):270–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reese JB, Somers TJ, Keefe FJ, Mosley-Williams A, Lumley MA. Pain and functioning of rheumatoid arthritis patients based on marital status: is a distressed marriage preferable to no marriage? J Pain. 2010;11(10):958–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gauthier N, Thibault P, Sullivan M. Catastrophizers with chronic pain display more pain behaviour when in a relationship with a low catastrophizing spouse. Pain Res Manag J Can Pain Soc (Journal De La Société Canadienne Pour Le Traitement De La Douleur). 2011;16(5):293–299. Available from: MEDLINE, Ipswich, MA. Accessed Apr 6 2015 [serial online].

  18. Gatchel R, Bernstein D, Stowell A, Pransky G. Psychosocial differences between high-risk acute vs. chronic low back pain patients. Pain Pract Off J World Inst Pain. 2008;8(2):91–7. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00176.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lackner JM, Gurtman MB. Pain catastrophizing and interpersonal problems: a circumplex analysis of the communal coping model. Pain. 2004;110(3):597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smeets RJEM, Vlaeyan JWS, Kester ADM, Knottnerus JA. Reduction of pain catastrophizing mediates the outcome of both physical and cognitive-behavioral treatment in chronic low back pain. J Pain. 2006;7(4):261–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Whisman RA, Baucom DH. Initimate relationships and psychopathology. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2012;15(1):4–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCracken LM. Social context and acceptance of chronic pain: the role of solicitous and punishing responses. Pain. 2005;113(1):155–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Turk DC, Rudy TE. Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients: integration of psychological assessment data. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56(2):233–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck depression inventory manual. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survery (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;51(11):903–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Million R, Hall W, Nilsen KH, Baker RD, Jayson MIV. Assessment of the progress of the back pain patient. Spine. 1982;7:204–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mooney V, Cairns D, Robertson J. A system for evaluating and treating chronic back disability. West J Med. 1976;124(5):370–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mooney V. Evaluating pain in the primary care office. J Musculoskelet Med. 1984;2:16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain. 1994;58:387–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJA. Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain disability. Pain. 1993;1993(52):157–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fairbanks JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271–3.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Matheson LN, Mooney V, Grant JE, Leggett S, Kenny K. Standardized evaluation of work capacity. J back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 1996;6(3):249–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Boothby JL, Thorn BE, Overduin LY, Ward CL. Catastrophizing and perceived partner responses to pain. Pain. 2004;109(3):500–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leonard M, Cano A, Johansen A. Chronic pain in a couples context: a review and integration of theoretical and empirical evidence. J Pain Off J Am Pain Soc. 2006;7(6):377–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cano A, Weisburg J, Gallagher RM. Marital satisfaction and pain severity mediate the association between negative spouse responses to pain and depressive symptoms in chronic pain patients. Pain Med. 2000;1:35–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bushatz A. Military divorce rates down slightly in 2012. Retreived from http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/01/23/military-divorce-rate-down-slightly-in-2012.html on September 23 2013.

  38. Harth W, Geiler U, Tausk FA, Kusnir D. The difficult or impossible-to-treat problem patient. In: Harth W, et al., editors. Clinical management in psychodermatology. Berlin: Springer; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cano A, Williams ACDC. Social interaction in pain: reinforcing pain behaviors or building intimacy? Pain. 2011;149:9–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cunningham JL, Hayes SE, Townsend CO, Laures HJ, Hooten WM. Associations between spousal or significant other solicitous responses and opioid dose in patients with chronic pain. Pain Med. 2012;13:1034–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Flor H, Kerns RD, Turk DC. The role of spouse reinforcement, perceived pain, and activity levels of chronic pain patients. J Psychosom Res. 1987;31(2):251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Romano JM, Jensen MP, Turne JA, Good AB, Hops H. Chronic pain patient–partner interactions: further support for a behavioral model of chronic pain. Behav Ther. 2000;31(3):415–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Williamson D, Robinson ME, Melamed B. Pain behavior, spouse responsiveness, and marital satisfaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Behav Modif. 1997;21(1):97–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Campbell CM, Kronfli T, Buenaver LF, et al. Situational versus dispositional measurement of catastrophizing: associations with pain responses in multiple samples. J Pain. 2010;11(5):443–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rusu AC, Pincus T, Morley S. Depressed pain patients differ from other depressed groups: examination of cognitive content in a sentence completion task. Pain. 2012;153(9):1898–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Choi Y, Mayer TG, Williams M, Gatchel RJ. The clinical utility of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) in characterizing chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;23:239–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wilson SJ, Martire LM, Keefe FJ, Mogle JA, Stephens MAP, Schulz R. Daily verbal and nonverbal expression of osteoarthritis pain and spouse responses. Pain. 2013;154(10):2045–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Band R, Wearden A, Barrowclough C. Patient outcomes in association with significant other responses to chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2015;22(1):29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hazard RG, Fenwick JW, Kalisch SM, et al. Functional restoration with behavioral support: a one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine. 1989;14:157–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N, et al. Objective assessment of comparison group and one-year follow up. Spine. 1985;10:482–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bendix T, Bendix AF, Lund C, Kirkbak S, Ostenfeld S. Comparison of three intensive programs for chronic low back pain patients: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study with one-year follow up. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;29:81–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gatchel RJ, Noe CE, Pulliam C, et al. A preliminary study of Multidimensional Pain Inventory profile differences in predicting treatment outcome in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2002;18:139–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mayer TG, Mooney V, Gatchel RJ, Barnes D, Terry A, Smith S, Mayer H. Quantifying postoperative deficits of physical function following spinal surgery. Clin Orthop. 1989;244:147–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. McCluskey S, Brooks J, King N, Burton K. The influence of’significant others’ on persistent back pain and work participation: a qualitative exploration of illness perceptions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(1):236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Pence L, Cano A, Thorn B, Ward LC. Perceived spouse responses to pain: the level of agreement in couple dyads and the role of catastrophizing, marital satisfaction, and depression. J Behav Med. 2006;29(6):511–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Romano JM, Jensen MP, Schmaling KB, Hops H, Buchwald DS. Illness behaviors in patients with unexplained chronic fatigue are associated with significant other responses. J Behav Med. 2009;32(6):558–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cano A, Barterian JA, Heller JB. Empathic and nonempathic interaction in chronic pain couples. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(8):678–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Miller LR, Cano A, Wurm LH. A motivational therapeutic assessment improves pain, mood, and relationship satisfaction in couples with chronic pain. J Pain. 2013;14(5):525–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors’ time and effort in preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by a research grant to the STRONG STAR Multidisciplinary PTSD Research Consortium from the US Department of Defense through the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program (Alan L. Peterson: W81XWH-08-02-0109; Robert Gatchel: W81XWH-08-2-113).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy A. McGeary.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors’ (Cindy McGeary, Tabatha Blount, Alan Peterson, Robert Gatchel, Willie Hale and Don McGeary) declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments of comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Additional information

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of or an endorsement by the US Army, the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the US Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGeary, C.A., Blount, T.H., Peterson, A.L. et al. Interpersonal Responses and Pain Management Within the US Military. J Occup Rehabil 26, 216–228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9605-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9605-2

Keywords

Navigation