Interpersonal Reasons for Interpersonal Perceptions: Gender-incongruent Purpose Goals and Nonverbal Judgment Accuracy
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Women’s tendency to outperform men on measures of accuracy in interpreting the meaning of nonverbal behavior might be due to such measures being more congruent with women’s interpersonal goals than men’s. The present study examined undergraduate men’s and women’s (N = 41) nonverbal judgment accuracy on the Interpersonal Perception Task-15 (IPT-15; Costanzo & Archer, 1993 [.The interpersonal perception task-15 (IPT-15). Berkeley: University of California Center for Media and Independent Learning) when the purpose for using their judgment skills was manipulated to be either congruent or incongruent with stereotypic “masculine” and “feminine” interpersonal goals. Results showed that each gender was at a relative disadvantage in judgment accuracy in the gender-incongruent goal conditions: women were relatively less accurate when they thought the IPT-15 measured judgment skills of use to interrogators in the military, whereas men were relatively less accurate when they thought the IPT-15 measured judgment skills of use to social workers in the social services. Discussion centers on the importance of matching individuals’ interpersonal goals to the purpose goals of the measure when using measures of interpersonal sensitivity.
- Ames, D. R., & Kammrath, L. K. (2004). Mind-reading and metacognition: Narcissism, not actual competence, predicts self-estimated ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 187–209. CrossRef
- Bar-Haim, G., & Wilkes, J. M. (1989). A cognitive interpretation of the marginality and underrepresentation of women in science. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 371–387. CrossRef
- Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 706–722. CrossRef
- Bianco, A. T., Higgins, E. T., & Klem, A. (2003). How “fun/importance” fit affects performance: Relating implicit theories to instructions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1091–1103. CrossRef
- Briton, N. J., & Hall, J. A. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32, 79–90. CrossRef
- Cataldi, A. E., & Reardon, R. (1996). Gender, interpersonal orientation, and manipulation tactic use in close relationships. Sex Roles, 35, 205–218. CrossRef
- Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The interpersonal perception task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 225–245. CrossRef
- Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1993). The Interpersonal Perception Task-15 (IPT-15), Berkeley: University of California Center for Media and Independent Learning.
- Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. CrossRef
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
- Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–171. CrossRef
- Graham, T., & Ickes, W. (1997). When women’s intuition isn’t greater than men’s. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 117–143). New York: Guilford.
- Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Hall, J. A. (2001). The PONS test and the psychometric approach to measuring interpersonal sensitivity. In J. A. Hall, & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 143–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Hall J. A., & Bernieri F. J. (Eds.) (2001). Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlhaum.
- Harackiewicz, J. M., & Sansone, C. (1991). Goals and intrinsic motivation: You can get there from here. In M. L. Maehr, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.) Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 21–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
- Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2, 173–183. CrossRef
- Horgan, T. G., Schmid Mast, M., Hall, J. A., & Carter, J. D. (2004). Gender differences in memory for the appearance of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 185–196. CrossRef
- Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109. CrossRef
- Iizuka, Y., Patterson, M. L., & Machen, J. C. (2002). Accuracy and confidence on the interpersonal perception task: A Japanese–American comparison. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26, 159–174. CrossRef
- Isaac, J., Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Other people as a source of interest in an activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 239–265. CrossRef
- Kaplan, M. F., Schaefer, E. G., & Zinkiewicz, L. (1994). Member preference for discussion content in anticipated group decisions: Effects of type of issue and group interactive goal. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 489–508. CrossRef
- Klein, K. J. K., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730. CrossRef
- Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Oxford, England: Harpers.
- Leyens, J.-P., Desert, M., Croizet, J.-C., & Darcis, C. (2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189–1199. CrossRef
- Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
- Morgan, C., Isaac, J. D., & Sansone, C. (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, 44, 295–320. CrossRef
- Mufson, L., & Nowicki, S., Jr. (1991). Factors affecting the accuracy of facial affect recognition. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 815–822. CrossRef
- Nowicki, S., Jr., & Hartigan, M. (1987). Accuracy of facial affect recognition as a function of locus of control orientation and anticipated interpersonal interaction. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 363–372. CrossRef
- Nowicki, S., & Richman, D. (1985). The effect of standard, motivation, and strategy instructions on the facial processing accuracy of internal and external subjects. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 354–364. CrossRef
- Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
- Rosip, J. C., & Hall, J. A. (2004). Knowledge of nonverbal cues, gender, and nonverbal decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 268–286. CrossRef
- Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). “I don’t feel like it”: The function of interest in self-regulation. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 203–228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Sansone, C., & Morgan, C. (1992). Intrinsic motivation and education: Competence in context. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 249–270. CrossRef
- Sansone, C., Sachau, D. A., & Weir, C. (1989). Effects of instruction on intrinsic interest: The importance of context. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 57, 819–829. CrossRef
- Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (2000). The “how” of goal pursuit: Interest and self-regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 306–309.
- Sarason, I. G. (1980). Introduction to the study of test anxiety. In I.G. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 3–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50, 835–850. CrossRef
- Smith, J. L. (2004). Understanding the process of stereotype threat: A review of mediational variables and new performance goal directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 177–206. CrossRef
- Smith, J. L., & Johnson, C. S. (2006). A stereotype boost or chocking under pressure? Positive gender stereotypes and men who are low in domain identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 51–63. CrossRef
- Smith, J. L., Morgan, C. L., & Sansone, C. (2001). Getting (inter) personal: The role of other people in the self-regulation of interest. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. V). Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
- Smith, J. L., & White, P. H. (2002). An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: It’s not just a woman’s issue. Sex Roles, 47, 179–191. CrossRef
- Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811. CrossRef
- Strough, J., Berg, C. A., & Sansone, C. (1996). Goals for solving everyday problems across the life span: Age and gender differences in the salience of interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology, 32, 1106–1115. CrossRef
- Swap, W. C., & Rubin, J. Z. (1983). Measurement of interpersonal orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 208–219. CrossRef
- Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429. CrossRef
- Thomas, G., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Lange, C. (1997). On-line empathic accuracy in marital interaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 839–850. CrossRef
- Timmers, M., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Gender differences in motives for regulating emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 974–985. CrossRef
- Interpersonal Reasons for Interpersonal Perceptions: Gender-incongruent Purpose Goals and Nonverbal Judgment Accuracy
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
Volume 30, Issue 3 , pp 127-140
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Goals interpersonal sensitivity
- Nonverbal judgment