Urban renewal without displacement? Belgium’s ‘housing contract experiment’ and the risks of gentrification
- Justus Uitermark,
- Maarten Loopmans
- … show all 2 hide
Abstract
Gentrification has become part and parcel of urban policies throughout the world. Critics have argued against those policies but they have not yet developed concrete and comprehensive alternatives. This paper seeks to remedy this omission by investigating the Belgian ‘housing contract’ experiment (2005–2007). Quite exceptionally, Belgium’s ‘housing contract’ experiment was based on the premise that housing policies should improve the quality of life in deprived urban neighborhoods without displacing the poor. We investigate both the philosophy of the housing contract experiment as well as its effects. On the basis of this evaluation, we sketch the contours of a housing policy that incorporates rent gap theory and counters the negative effects arising from disinvestment and gentrification.
- Atkinson, R (2000) The hidden costs of gentrification, displacement in Central London. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 15: pp. 307-326 CrossRef
- Bontje, M (2004) Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig. GeoJournal 61: pp. 13-21 CrossRef
- Brenner, N, Theodore, N eds. (2002) Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in Western Europe and North America. Blackwell, Oxford
- Brenner, N, Peck, J, Theodore, N (2010) Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks 10: pp. 182-222 CrossRef
- Bridge, G, Butler, T, Lees, L (2012) Mixed communities: Gentrification by stealth?. The Policy Press, Bristol
- Cheshire, P, Hay, D (1989) Urban problems in Western Europe: An economic analysis. Unwin Hymann, London
- Davidson, M, Lees, L (2005) New-build `gentrification’ and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A 37: pp. 1165-1190 CrossRef
- Decker, P (2008) Facets of housing and housing policies in Belgium. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 23: pp. 155-171 CrossRef
- Decker, P, Dewilde, C (2010) Home-ownership and asset-based welfare: The case of Belgium. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 25: pp. 243-262 CrossRef
- Maesschalck, F (2010) The politicisation of suburbanization in Belgium: Towards an urban-suburban divide. Urban Studies 48: pp. 699-717 CrossRef
- Maesschalck, F, Loopmans, M (2003) Electoral geography and manifestos of new ‘Urban’ parties from 1977–1999: How urban are they really?. Belgeo 3: pp. 329-342
- DeFilippis, J, Fraser, J What Kind of mixed-income housing and for what reasons?. In: Davies, J, Imbroscio, D eds. (2010) Critical urban studies: New directions. Suny Press, Albany
- Hackworth, J (2007) The neoliberal city. Governance, ideology, and development in American Urbanism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
- Kesteloot, C, Maesschalck, F (2001) Anti-urbanism in Flanders: The political and social consequences of a spatial class struggle strategy. Belgeo 1: pp. 41-62
- Kesteloot, C, Turck, A, Vandermotten, C, Marissal, P, Hamme, G (2001) Sociale structuren en buurten in moeilijkheden in de Belgische stadsgewesten. Ministerie voor Grootstedenbeleid, Brussel
- Kesteloot, C, Vandermotten, C, Ippersiel, B (2007) Dynamische analyse van de buurten in moeilijkheden in de Belgische stadsgewesten. POD Maatschappelijke Integratie, Brussel
- Kuyucu, T, Ünsal, Ö (2010) ‘Urban transformation’ as state-led property transfer: An analysis of two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies 47: pp. 1479-1499 CrossRef
- Lees, L (2003) Commentary. Environment and Planning A 35: pp. 571-574 CrossRef
- Lees, L (2008) Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an Urban renaissance?. Urban Studies 45: pp. 2449-2470 CrossRef
- Lees, L, Slater, T, Wyly, E (2008) Gentrification. Routledge, London
- Loopmans, M (2008) Relevance, gentrification and the development of a new hegemony on urban policies in Antwerp, Belgium. Urban Studies 45: pp. 2499-2519 CrossRef
- Loopmans, M, Luyten, S, Kesteloot, C Urban policies in Belgium: A puff-pastry with a bittersweet aftertaste?. In: Berg, L, Braun, E, Meer, J eds. (2007) National policy responses to Urban challenges in Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot
- Loopmans, M, Decker, P, Kesteloot, C (2010) Social mix and passive revolution. A neo-gramscian analysis of the social mix rhetoric in Flanders, Belgium. Housing Studies 25: pp. 181-200 CrossRef
- Macleod, G, Johnstone, C (2012) Stretching urban renaissance: Privatizing space, civilizing place, summoning ‘community’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36: pp. 1-28 CrossRef
- Marcuse, P Abandonment, gentrification and displacement: The linkages in New York City. In: Smith, N, Williams, P eds. (1986) Gentrification of the City. Unwin Hyman, London
- Narsiah, S (2010) The neoliberalisation of the local state in Durban, South Africa. Antipode 42: pp. 374-403 CrossRef
- Programma Grootstedenbeleid, Huisvestingsplan: Richtlijnen voor de huisvestingscontracten 2005–2007. POD Sociale Integratie, Brussel
- Rekenhof (2007) Het federale grootstedenbeleid, onderzoek van de stads- en huisvestingscontracten 2005–2007. Brussels: Rekenhof.
- Slater, T (2009) Missing marcuse: On gentrification and displacement. City 13: pp. 292-311 CrossRef
- Smith, N (1996) The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. Routledge, London
- Smith, N Gentrification generalized: From local anomaly to urban ‘regeneration’ as global urban strategy. In: Fisher, M, Downey, G eds. (2006) Frontiers of capital: Ethnographic reflections on the new economy. Duke University Press, Durham, NC
- Theodore, N, Peck, J (2012) Framing neoliberal urbanism: Translating ‘commonsense’ urban policy across the OECD zone. European Urban and Regional Studies 19: pp. 20-41 CrossRef
- Uitermark, J (2003) De sociale controle van achterstandswijken. Een beleidsgenetisch perspectief. Knag, Amsterdam
- Uitermark, J An actually existing just city? The fight for the right to the city in Amsterdam. In: Brenner, N, Mayer, M, Marcuse, P eds. (2011) Cities for people, not for profit, 197–214. Blackwell, Oxford
- Uitermark, J, Duyvendak, JW, Kleinhans, R (2007) Gentrification as a governmental strategy. Social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam. Environment and Planning A 39: pp. 125-141 CrossRef
- Criekingen, M (2008) Towards a geography of displacement. Moving out of Brussels’ gentrifying neighbourhoods. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 23: pp. 199-213 CrossRef
- Criekingen, M Meanings, politics and realities of social mix and gentrification: A view from Brussels. In: Bridge, G, Butler, T, Lees, L eds. (2012) Mixed communities. Gentrification by stealth?. Routledge, London, pp. 185-208
- Van Gent, W. P. C. (2012). Neo-liberalization, housing institutions and variegated gentrification; How the ‘Third Wave’ broke in Amsterdam. International Journal for Urban and Regional Research 35 (forthcoming).
- Title
- Urban renewal without displacement? Belgium’s ‘housing contract experiment’ and the risks of gentrification
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
- Journal
-
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
Volume 28, Issue 1 , pp 157-166
- Cover Date
- 2013-03-01
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10901-012-9299-0
- Print ISSN
- 1566-4910
- Online ISSN
- 1573-7772
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Topics
- Keywords
-
- Gentrification
- Housing policy
- Urban policy
- Displacement
- Rent gap theory
- Belgium
- Industry Sectors
- Authors
-
-
Justus Uitermark
(1)
-
Maarten Loopmans
(2)
-
Justus Uitermark
- Author Affiliations
-
- 1. Department of Sociology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- 2. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001, Leuven, Belgium