Lakota Elders’ Views on Traditional Versus Commercial/Addictive Tobacco Use; Oral History Depicting a Fundamental Distinction
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This qualitative study is intended to elucidate Lakota elders’ views on traditional tobacco and commercial/addictive tobacco use, capturing the oral history that depict the cultural protocol regarding traditional tobacco, called Cansasa. Commercial tobacco use has significantly impacted the Northern Plains Indians. National surveillance systems report that tobacco use is more prevalent among American Indian/Alaska Natives than any other population, and is notably higher than the national average. Lung cancer among Native Americans is highest in the Northern Plains and Alaska, where smoking prevalence is also the highest, and smoking is responsible for nearly 90 % of all lung cancer cases. Yet, the use of traditional tobacco is largely ignored by surveillance and seems to have a distinct, positive role. Using a community-based participatory research approach, semi-structured interviews, and qualitative analysis tools, the research team, including 2 Lakota tribe elders, Lakota speaking tribal college students, and university faculty, sought to discern tribal elders’ distinctions between traditional and the addictive commercial tobacco. The team interviewed thirty Lakota elders, transcribed the interviews and field notes, and analyzed them using immersion/crystallization organizing framework. The research design engaged the Lakota tribal community in all stages, from planning to publication. Analysis revealed a clear distinction between traditional and commercial tobacco: tribal elders conveyed strong positive messages connected to traditional tobacco use (i.e., spirituality, respect, health and wellness, humility, and thoughtfulness) versus strong negative messages linked to addictive tobacco (i.e., crime, loss of control and self-esteem, lack of respect to self and others, sickness and death). These messages, along with stories in the Lakota language that were told and recorded during the interviews, can guide new ways to address addictive tobacco prevention in this community, to enhance cultural pride, and to serve as a cross-generation bridge regarding tobacco use.
- Alford, K. (2012). In J. Macedo, F. Kennedy & J. Weber (Eds.), Family smoking prevention and tobacco control act: Strengthening tribal sovereignty and health. National Native Network.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2005). Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 1997–2001. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 54(25), 625–628.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2005). Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2004. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 54(44), 1121–1124.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2002). Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs—United States, 1995–1999. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51(14), 300–303.
- Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Qualitative research guidelines project. Retrieved January 6, 2012, from http://www.qualres.org/HomeConf-3807.html.
- Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Devers, K. J. (1999). How will we know “good” qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1153–1188.
- Espey, D. K., Wu, X. C., Swan, J., Wiggins, C., Jim, M. A., Ward, E., et al. (2007). Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Cancer, 110(10), 2119–2152. CrossRef
- Giacomini, M. K., & Cook, D. J. (2000). Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(3), 357–362. CrossRef
- High Horse, B. (2004). Traditional versus commercial tobacco. 2004 youth tobacco conference, Pierre, SD.
- Kaiser, P. L. (1984). The Lakota sacred pipe: Its tribal use and religious philosophy. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 08(3), 1–26.
- Kills Small, J. (2005). Traditional tobacco. 2005 youth tobacco conference, Rapid City, SD.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
- Mails, T. E. (1978). Sundancing at Rosebud and Pine Ridge. Sioux Falls, SD: Center for Western Studies.
- McGuire, J. D. (2003). Pipes and smoking customs of the American aborigines: Based on materials in the U. S. national museum. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.
- Pego, C. M., Hill, R. F., Solomon, G. W., Chisholm, R. M., & Ivey, S. E. (1995). Tobacco, culture, and health among American Indians: A historical review. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 19(2), 143–164.
- Seig, L. (1971). Tobacco, Peacepipes, and Indians. Palmer Lake, CO: Filter Press.
- Stevens, M. (2002). Native American genealogy presentation for the Nourish your family roots workshop. Retrieved February 4, 2012, from http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mikestevens/native_american_genealogy.htm.
- Lakota Elders’ Views on Traditional Versus Commercial/Addictive Tobacco Use; Oral History Depicting a Fundamental Distinction
Journal of Community Health
Volume 38, Issue 3 , pp 538-545
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Traditional tobacco
- Commercial/addictive tobacco
- American Indian
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Service Learning Academy, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986075 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
- 5. Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986075 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
- 2. Health Education and Promotion Council, Rapid City, SD, USA
- 3. Family and Community Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA
- 4. University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, USA