Improved Self-exclusion Program: Preliminary Results
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The gambling industry has offered self-exclusion programs for quite a long time. Such measures are designed to limit access to gaming opportunities and provide problem gamblers with the help they need to cease or limit their gambling behaviour. However, few studies have empirically evaluated these programs. This study has three objectives: (1) to observe the participation in an improved self-exclusion program that includes an initial voluntary evaluation, phone support, and a mandatory meeting, (2) to evaluate satisfaction and usefulness of this service as perceived by self-excluders, (3) to measure the preliminary impact of this improved program. One hundred sixteen self-excluders completed a questionnaire about their satisfaction and their perception of the usefulness during the mandatory meeting. Among those participants, 39 attended an initial meeting. Comparisons between data collected at the initial meeting and data taken at the final meeting were made for those 39 participants. Data showed that gamblers chose the improved self-exclusion program 75% of the time; 25% preferred to sign a regular self-exclusion contract. Among those who chose the improved service, 40% wanted an initial voluntary evaluation and 37% of these individuals actually attended that meeting. Seventy percent of gamblers came to the mandatory meeting, which was a required condition to end their self-exclusion. The majority of participants were satisfied with the improved self-exclusion service and perceived it as useful. Major improvements were observed between the final and the initial evaluation on time and money spent, consequences of gambling, DSM-IV score, and psychological distress. The applicability of an improved self-exclusion program is discussed and, as shown in our study, the inclusion of a final mandatory meeting might not be so repulsive for self-excluders. Future research directives are also proposed.
- American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
- Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, J. D. (2004a). Self-exclusion: A gateway to treatment. Report prepared for the Australian Gaming Council.
- Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004b). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 301–317. doi:10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e2. CrossRef
- Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460. doi:10.1023/A:1009488308348. CrossRef
- Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 85–94. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9032-6. CrossRef
- National Gambling Impact Study Commission. (1999). Final report. Washington, Dc: Government Printing Office.
- Nowatzki, R., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programmes: A review of the issues. International Gambling Studies, 2(3–25), 3–25. CrossRef
- Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self-exclusion. Discussion Paper by the responsible Gambling Council.
- Sani, A., Carlevaro, T., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Impact of a counselling session on at-risk casino patrons: A pilot study. Gambling Research, 17, 47–52.
- Townshend, P. (2007). Self-exclusion in a public health environment: An effective treatment option in New Zealand. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 5, 390–395.
- Improved Self-exclusion Program: Preliminary Results
Journal of Gambling Studies
Volume 24, Issue 4 , pp 505-518
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links