Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treating Couples Who Mutually Exhibit Violence or Aggression: Reducing Behaviors that Show a Susceptibility for Violence

  • Developing Interventions for Family Violence
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work evaluated a psycho-educational, group-based, conjoint treatment for couples experiencing intimate partner violence characterized by mutual low-level physical violence and psychological aggression. The ability of the treatment program to reduce violence between partners was evaluated via a multi-method, multi-informant, multiple time point experimental design. Procedures were completed at four times: baseline/pre-treatment, post-treatment, ~six months post-treatment, and ~12 months post-treatment. At each time point, couples individually self-reported on violence in the relationship and participated in a conflict discussion during which behaviors that show a propensity toward violence (i.e., contempt, belligerence, domineering, anger, and defensiveness) were observed. Results show that the program had no direct impact on self-reported violence. However, the program did impact observed behavior; males in the treatment group showed a significant decline in behaviors that show a propensity toward violence. Although the model for females was not significant, the pattern for females was comparable to that of males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Please note that variation within the timing of when data collection procedures occurred were the result of scheduling complications (e.g., participants were not always available to complete procedures at the desired time range).

  2. Please note that only statistics related to the interactions are described in detail hereafter since the main effects for Time and Group do not address research questions relevant to this work.

References

  • Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., & Yerington, T. P. (2000). Attachment, emotional regulation, and the function of marital violence: Differences between secure, preoccupied, and dismissing violent and nonviolent husbands. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1986). Observing Interactions: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. P. C., & Gottman, J. M. (2012). Reducing situational violence in low-income couples by fostering healthy relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. Advance online publication.. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00288.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. P. C., Friend, D. J., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Supporting healthy relationships in low-income, violent couples: reducing conflict and strengthening relationship skills and satisfaction. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 10, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berns, S. B., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999a). Demand–withdraw interaction in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 666–674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berns, S. B., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999b). Demand/withdraw interaction patterns between different types of batterers and their spouses. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 337–347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C., Kotch, J., & Everson, M. (2003). A longitudinal study of modifying influences in the relationship between domestic violence and child maltreatment. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, M. E., Robyak, J., Torosian, E. J., & Hummer, J. (2006). A study of male veterans' beliefs toward domestic violence in a batterers intervention program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1111–1128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunradi, C. B., Caetano, R., & Schafer, J. (2002). Religious affiliation, denominational homogamy, and intimate partner violence among U.S. couples. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 139–151

  • Dion, M. (2005). Healthy marriage programs: Learning what works. The Future of Children, 15, 139–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. (1978) Facial Action Coding System. A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alt.

  • Friend, D. J., Bradley, R. P. C., Thatcher, R., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Typologies of intimate partner violence: Evaluation of a screening instrument for differentiation. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 551–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, V., Manganello, J., Campbell, J., Walton-Moss, B., & Wilt, S. (2006). The distribution of and factors associated with intimate terrorism and situational couple violence among a population-based sample of urban women in the United. States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1286–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1994). What Predicts Divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1999). The Relationship Clinic. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halford, W., Markman, H., & Stanley, S. (2008). Strengthening couples' relationships with education. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 497–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. J., Stanley, S. M., Blanchard, V. L., & Albright, M. (2012). Exploring programmatic moderators of the effectiveness of marriage and relationship education programs: A meta-analytic study. Behavior Therapy, 43, 77–87.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heckart, D. A., & Gondolf, E. (2000). Assessing assault self-reports by batterer program participants and their partners. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, S., & Campbell, F. (1999). What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomized controlled trials. BMJ, 319, 670–674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., Babcock, J., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1994). Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 982–988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., & Babcock, J. (2000). Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Prevention & Treatment, 3, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1998). When men batter women: New insights into ending abusive relationships. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jory, B. (2004). The intimate justice scale: An instrument to screen for psychological abuse and physical violence in clinical practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 29–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, H. J., & Rhoades, G. K. (2012). Relationship education research: Current status and future directions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 169–200.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ooms, T., & Wilson, P. (2004). The challenges of offering relationship and marriage education to low-income populations. Family Relations, 53, 440–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, L. E., Atkins, D. C., Gattis, K. S., & Christensen, A. (2008). Low-level relationship aggression and couple therapy outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 102–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., McCollum, E. E., Amanor-Boadu, Y., & Smith, D. (2012). Systemic perspectives on intimate partner violence treatments. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 220–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., & McCollum, E. E. (2003). Effectiveness of couples treatment for spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 29, 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., McCollum, E. E., & Thomsen, C. J. (2004). Treating intimate partner violence within intact couple relationships: Outcomes of multi-couple versus individual couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 305–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stover, C. S., Meadows, A. L., & Kaufman, J. (2009). Interventions for intimate partner violence: Review and implications for evidence-based practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1989). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. In M. A. Strauss & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical Violence in American families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (2011). Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Smith, C. (1990). Family patterns and primary prevention of family violence. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical Violence in American Families (pp. 507–526). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szinovacz, M. E., & Egley, L. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage & The Family, 57, 995–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (ACF) (90OJ2022). The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ACF. We also express our gratitude to the following people who helped make this project possible: Robin Dion, Daniel Friend, Dan Yoshimoto, and all of the staff and volunteers at the Relationship Research Institute who worked on the CTAV project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renay P. Cleary Bradley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bradley, R.P.C., Drummey, K., Gottman, J.M. et al. Treating Couples Who Mutually Exhibit Violence or Aggression: Reducing Behaviors that Show a Susceptibility for Violence. J Fam Viol 29, 549–558 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9615-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9615-4

Keywords

Navigation