Paternalism and the Ill-Informed Agent
- Jason Hanna
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Most anti-paternalists claim that informed and competent self-regarding choices are protected by autonomy, while ill-informed or impaired self-regarding choices are not. Joel Feinberg, among many others, argues that we can in this way distinguish impermissible “hard” paternalism from permissible “soft” paternalism. I argue that this view confronts two related problems in its treatment of ill-informed decision-makers. First, it faces a dilemma when applied to decision-makers who are responsible for their ignorance: it either permits too much, or else too little, intervention to satisfy its proponents. Second, the most promising rationales in favor of the view ignore the distinction between an agent’s voluntarily bringing about some state of affairs, on the one hand, and an agent’s voluntarily assuming a risk, on the other. I conclude that a decision-maker’s ignorance is irrelevant to the permissibility of intervention on her behalf. If it is permissible to intervene in a given ill-informed choice, it would be permissible to intervene in an otherwise similar but informed choice, at least provided that intervention would produce similar benefits in both cases. This shows that we should sometimes accept straightforwardly paternalistic rationales.
- Archard, David. 1994. For our own good. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 283–293. CrossRef
- Arneson, Richard. 1980. Mill versus paternalism. Ethics 90: 470–489. CrossRef
- Arneson, Richard. 2005. Joel Feinberg and the justification of hard paternalism. Legal Theory 11: 259–284. CrossRef
- Beauchamp, Tom. 1977. Paternalism and biobehavioral control. Monist 60: 62–80.
- Boonin, David. 2003. A defense of abortion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Damelio, Jennifer, and Kelly Sorensen. 2008. Enhancing autonomy in paid surrogacy. Bioethics 22: 269–277. CrossRef
- De Marneffe, Peter. 2010. Liberalism and prostitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dworkin, Gerald. 1971. Paternalism. In Morality and the law, ed. Richard Wasserstrom, 107–126. Belmont: Wadsworth.
- Dworkin, Gerald. 1988. The theory and practice of autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Feinberg, Joel. 1986. Harm to self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gert, Bernard, and Charles M. Culver. 1976. Paternalistic behavior. Philosophy & Public Affairs 6: 45–57.
- Goldman, Michael, and Alan Goldman. 1990. Paternalistic laws. Philosophical Topics 18: 65–78.
- Hanna, Jason. 2011a. Paternalism and Impairment. Social Theory and Practice 37: 434–460.
- Hanna, Jason. 2011b. Consent and the Problem of Framing Effects. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14: 517–531.
- Hodson, John. 1977. The principle of paternalism. American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 61–69.
- Hodson, John. 1981. Mill, paternalism, and slavery. Analysis 41: 60–62.
- Hurd, Heidi. 1996. The moral magic of consent. Legal Theory 2: 121–146. CrossRef
- Husak, Douglas. 2010. Paternalism and consent. In The ethics of consent, ed. Franklin Miller, and Alan Wertheimer, 107–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kuflik, Arthur. 2010. Hypothetical consent. In The ethics of consent, ed. Franklin Miller, and Alan Wertheimer, 131–161. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Malm, Heidi. 2005. Feinberg’s anti-paternalism and the balancing strategy. Legal Theory 11: 193–212. CrossRef
- Mill, J.S. 1859/1991. On liberty. In On liberty and other essays, ed. John Gray, 5–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- New, Bill. 1999. Paternalism and public policy. Economics and Philosophy 15: 63–83. CrossRef
- Sankowski, Edward. 1985. ‘Paternalism’ and social policy. American Philosophical Quarterly 22: 1–12.
- Sartorius, Rolf. 1983. Paternalistic grounds for involuntary civil commitment: a utilitarian perspective. In Paternalism, ed. Rolf Sartorius, 95–102. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Savulescu, Julian. 1994. Rational desires and the limitation of life-sustaining treatment. Bioethics 8: 191–222. CrossRef
- Scoccia, Danny. 1990. Paternalism and Respect for Autonomy. Ethics 100: 318–334.
- Scoccia, Danny. 2008. In defense of hard paternalism. Law and Philosophy 27: 351–381. CrossRef
- Scoccia, Danny. 2010. Physician-assisted suicide, disability, and paternalism. Social Theory and Practice 36: 479–498.
- Shiffrin, Seana. 2000. Paternalism, unconscionability doctrine, and accommodation. Philosophy & Public Affairs 29: 205–250. CrossRef
- Sunstein, Cass, and Richard Thaler. 2003. Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review 70: 1159–1202. CrossRef
- Trout, J.D. 2005. Paternalism and cognitive bias. Law and Philosophy 24: 393–434. CrossRef
- VanDeVeer, Donald. 1986. Paternalistic intervention: The moral bounds of benevolence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Wall, Steven. 2009. Self-ownership and paternalism. The Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 399–417. CrossRef
- Wertheimer, Alan. 1987. Coercion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Zimmerman, David. 2002. Taking liberties: The perils of ‘moralizing’ freedom and coercion in social theory and practice. Social Theory and Practice 28: 577–609.
- Paternalism and the Ill-Informed Agent
The Journal of Ethics
Volume 16, Issue 4 , pp 421-439
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Joel Feinberg
- Jason Hanna (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Northern Illinois University, Zulauf Hall 915, DeKalb, IL, 60115, USA