“Group Rights” and Racial Affirmative Action
- Kwame Anthony Appiah
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This article argues against the view that affirmative action is wrong because it involves assigning group rights. First, affirmative action does not have to proceed by assigning rights at all. Second, there are, in fact, legitimate “group rights” both legal and moral; there are collective rights—which are exercised by groups—and membership rights—which are rights people have in virtue of group membership. Third, there are continuing harms that people suffer as blacks and claims to remediation for these harms can fairly treat the (social) property of being black as tracking the victims of those harms. Affirmative action motivated in this way aims to respond to individual wrongs; wrongs that individuals suffer, as it happens, in virtue of their membership in groups. Finally, the main right we have when we are being considered for jobs and places at colleges is that we be treated according to procedures that are morally defensible. Morally acceptable procedures sometimes take account of the fact that a person is a member of a certain social group.
- Appiah, Kwame Anthony, and Amy Gutmann. 1996. Color conscious: The political morality of race. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Appiah, Anthony. 2001. Stereotypes and the shaping of identity. In Prejudicial appearances: The logic of American anti-discrimination law, ed. Robert Post, 55–71. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Appiah, Anthony. 2005a. The ethics of identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Appiah, Anthony. 2005b. Thinking it through. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Corlett, J. Angelo. 1994. The problem of collective moral rights. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 7:242–256.
- Eliot, T.S. 1968. Four quartets. New York: Harcourt.
- Feinberg, Joel. 1987. Harm to others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Harris-Lacewell, Melissa. 2007. Political science and the study of African American public opinion. In African American perspectives on political science, ed. Wilbur Rich. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
- May, Larry. 1990. The morality of groups: Collective responsibility, group-based harm, and corporate rights. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Pogge, Thomas W. 1992. Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethics 103: 48–75. CrossRef
- Sterba, James P. 2009. Affirmative action for the future. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- “Group Rights” and Racial Affirmative Action
The Journal of Ethics
Volume 15, Issue 3 , pp 265-280
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Affirmative action
- Collective rights
- Group rights
- Identitarian harms
- Membership rights
- Probabilistic harms
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA