Survey nonresponse and the distribution of income
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The paper examines the distributional implications of selective compliance in sample surveys, whereby households with different incomes are not equally likely to participate. Poverty and inequality measurement implications are discussed for monotonically decreasing and inverted-U compliance-income relationships. We demonstrate that the latent income effect on the probability of compliance can be estimated from information on response rates across geographic areas. On implementing the method on the Current Population Survey for the U.S. we find that the compliance probability falls monotonically as income rises. Correcting for nonresponse appreciably increases mean income and inequality, but has only a small impact on poverty incidence up to poverty lines common in the U.S.
- Alho, J.M. (1990) Adjusting for nonresponse bias using logistic regression. Biometrica 77: pp. 617-624 CrossRef
- Atkinson, A.B. (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J. Economic Theory 2: pp. 244-263 CrossRef
- Atkinson, A.B. (1987) On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica 55: pp. 749-764 CrossRef
- Atkinson, A.B., Micklewright, J. (1983) On the reliability of income data in the family expenditure survey 1970–1977. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 146: pp. 33-61 CrossRef
- Bhalla, S. (2002) Imagine There's No Country: Poverty, Inequality and Growth in the Era of Globalization. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
- Bourguignon, F., Morrisson, C. (2002) Inequality among world citizens: 1820–1992. American Economic Review 92: pp. 727-744 CrossRef
- Bureau of Labor Statistics: Urban Family Budgets and Comparative Indexes for Selected Urban Areas, U.S. Department of Labor, 1981.
- Census Bureau: Poverty in the United States: 2001, Current Population Report P60-219, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 2001.
- Census Bureau: Current population survey – design and methodology, Technical Paper 63RV, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 2002.
- Chakravarty, S.R., Eichhorn, W. Measurement of income inequality: Observed versus true data. In: Eichhorn, W. eds. (1994) Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
- Chesher, A., Schluter, C. (2002) Welfare measurement and measurement error. Review of Economic Studies 69: pp. 357-378 CrossRef
- Cowell, F.A., Victoria-Feser, M. (1996) Robustness of inequality measures. Econometrica 64: pp. 77-101 CrossRef
- Deming, W.E. (1953) On a probability mechanism to attain an economic balance between the resultant error of response and the bias of nonresponse. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 48: pp. 743-772 CrossRef
- Eichhorn, W., Funke, H., Richter, W.F. (1984) Tax progression and inequality of income distribution. J. Mathematical Economics 13: pp. 127-131 CrossRef
- Friar, M.E. and Leonard, H.B.: Variations in cost of living across states, Taubman Center for State and Local Government, John F. Kennedy School, Harvard University, 1998.
- Groves, R.E., Couper, M.P. (1998) Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. Wiley, New York
- Hansen, L.P. (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50: pp. 1029-1054 CrossRef
- Holt, D., Elliot, D. (1991) Methods of weighting for unit nonresponse. The Statistician 40: pp. 333-342 CrossRef
- Korinek, A., Mistiaen, J. and Ravallion, M.: An econometric method of correcting for unit nonresponse bias in surveys, Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, 2004, forthcoming.
- Lillard, L., Smith, J.P., Welch, F. (1986) What do we really know about wages? The importance of nonreporting and census imputation. J. Political Economy 94: pp. 489-506 CrossRef
- Little, R.J.A., Rubin, D.B. (1987) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley, New York
- Nijman, T., Verbeek, M. (1992) Nonresponse in panel data: The impact on estimates of a life cycle consumption function. J. Applied Econometrics 7: pp. 243-257 CrossRef
- Peracchi, F. (2001) Econometrics. Wiley, New York
- Ravallion, M. (1994) Poverty rankings using noisy data on living standards. Economics Letters 45: pp. 481-485 CrossRef
- Ravallion, M. (2000) Should poverty measures be anchored to the national accounts?. Economic and Political Weekly 34: pp. 3245-3252
- Ravallion, M. (2002) Measuring aggregate welfare in developing countries: How well do national accounts and surveys agree?. Review of Economics and Statistics 85: pp. 645-652 CrossRef
- Sala-i-Martin, X.: The world distribution of income (estimated from individual country distributions), NBER Working Paper No. W8933, 2002.
- Scott, K. and Steele, D.: Measuring welfare in developing countries: Living standards measurement study surveys, In: Surveys in Developing and Transition Countries, UN Statistical Division, 2004, forthcoming.
- Praag, B., Hagenaars, A., Eck, W. (1983) The influence of classification and observation errors on the measurement of income inequality. Econometrica 51: pp. 1093-1108 CrossRef
- Survey nonresponse and the distribution of income
The Journal of Economic Inequality
Volume 4, Issue 1 , pp 33-55
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- income distribution
- poverty and inequality measurement
- survey nonresponse
- Industry Sectors