Date: 06 Nov 2012
The Response to Selection for Broad Male Response to Female Sex Pheromone and its Implications for Divergence in Close-Range Mating Behavior in the European Corn Borer Moth, Ostrinia nubilalis
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Coordinated sexual communication systems, seen in many species of moths, are hypothesized to be under strong stabilizing natural selection. Stabilized communication systems should be resistant to change, but there are examples of species/populations that show great diversification. A possible solution is that it is directional sexual selection on variation in male response that drives evolution. We tested a component of this model by asking whether ‘rare’ males (ca. 5 % of all males in a population) of the European corn borer moth (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis, that respond to the sex pheromones of both ECB and a different Ostrinia species (O. furnacalis, the Asian corn borer, ACB), might play an important role in diversification. We specifically tested, via artificial selection, whether this broad male response has an evolvable genetic component. We increased the frequency of broad male response from 5 to 70 % in 19 generations, showing that broad-responding males could be important for the evolution of novel communication systems in ECB. We did not find a broader range of mating acceptance of broad males by females of the base population, however, suggesting that broad response would be unlikely to increase in frequency without the involvement of other factors. However, we found that ECB selection-line females accepted a broader range of courting males, including those of ACB, than did females of the base population. Thus, a genetic correlation exists between broad, long-range response to female sex pheromone and the breadth of female acceptance of males at close range. These results are discussed in the context of evolution of novel communication systems in Ostrinia.
Allison, J. D. and Cardé, R. T. 2008. Male pheromone blend preference function measured in choice and no-choice wind tunnel trials with almond moths. Cadra cautella. Animal Behaviour. 76:259–266.CrossRef
Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press.
Ando, T., Saito, O., Arai, K., and Takahashi, N. 1980. (Z) and (E) 12-Tetradecenyl; acetates: Sex pheromone components of oriental corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae. Agri. Biol. Chem. 44:2643–2649.CrossRef
Baker, T. C. 1989. Origin of courtship and sex pheromones of the oriental fruit moth and a discussion of the role of phytochemicals in the evolution of Lepidopteran male scents. pp 401–418, in C. H. Chou, and G. R. Walker, (eds.). Phytochemical Ecology: Alleochemicals, Mycotoxins, and insect pheromones and allomones, Monograph series No. 9, Institute of Botany, Academica Sinica, Taipei.
Cardé, R. T. and Haynes, K. F. 2004. Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths, pp. 283–332, in R. T. Cardé and J. G. Millar (eds.), Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRef
Collins, R. D. and Cardé, R. T. 1989. Selection for altered pheromone-component ratios in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Insect Behav. 2:609–621.CrossRef
Cossé, A. A., Campbell, M. G., Glover, T. J., Linn Jr., C. E., Todd, J. L., Baker, T. C., and Roelofs, W. L. 1995. Pheromone behavioral response in unusual male European corn borer hybrid progeny not correlated to electrophysiological phenotypes of their pheromone-specific antennal responses. Experientia 51:809–816.CrossRef
Coyne, J. A., and ORR, H. A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Press.
Falconer, D. S. and Mackay, T. F. C. 1996. An Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Pearson, New York.
Glover, T. J., X-H, T. A. N. G., and Roelofs, W. L. 1987. Sex pheromone blend discrimination by male moths from E and Z strains of European corn borer. J. Chem. Ecol. 13:143–151.CrossRef
Glover, T. J., Campbell, M. G., Linn Jr., C. E., and Roelofs, W. L. 1991. Unique sex chromosome mediated behavioral response specificity of hybrid male European corn borer moths. Experientia 47:980–984.CrossRef
Haynes, K. F. 1997. Genetics of pheromone communication in the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni, pp. 525–534, in R. T. Cardé and A. K. Minks (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions. Chapman and Hall, New York.CrossRef
Haynes, K. F. and Hunt 1990. A mutation in the pheromonal communication system of the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:1249–1257.CrossRef
Haynes, K. F., Gaston, L. K., Mistrot-Pope, M., and Baker, T. C. 1984. Potential for evolution of resistance to pheromones: Interindividual and interpopulation variation in chemical communication system of pink bollworm moth. J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1551–1565.CrossRef
Hill, W. G. and Caballero, A. 1992. Artificial selection experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:287–310.CrossRef
Ishikawa, Y., Takanashi, T., C-G, K. I. M., Hoshizaki, S., Tatsuki, S., and Huang, Y. 1999. Ostrinia spp. In Japan: their host plants and sex pheromones. Entom. Exp. Appl. 91:237–244.CrossRef
Kearsey, M. J. and Pooni, H. S. 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman and Hall, London.
Krasnoff, S. B. and Roelofs, W. L. 1990. Evolutionary trends in the male pheromone systems of arctiid moths: evidence from studies of courtship in Phragmatobia fuliginosa and Pyrrharctia isabella (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 99:319–338.CrossRef
Linn Jr., C. E. and Roelofs, W. L. 1995. Pheromone communication in the moths and its role in the speciation process, pp. 263–300, in D. H. Lambert and H. Spencer (eds.), Speciation and the Recognition Concept: Theory and Application. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Linn Jr., C. E., Young, M., Gendle, M. S., Glover, T. J., and Roelofs, W. L. 1997. Sex pheromone blend discrimination in two races and hybrids of the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis. Physiol. Entomol 22:212–223.CrossRef
Linn, C. E. Jr., O'Connor M., and Roelofs, W. L. 2003. Silent genes and rare males: A fresh look at pheromone blend response specificity in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis. J. Insect Science. 3:15, Available online: insectscience.org/3.15
Löfstedt, C. 1990. Population variation and genetic control of pheromone communication systems in moths. Ent. Exp. Appl. 54:199–218.CrossRef
Löfstedt, C. 1993. Moth pheromone genetics and evolution. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 340:167–177.CrossRef
Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA.
Paterson, H. E. H. 1985. The recognition concept of species. pp 21–30, in E. S. Vrba, (ed.). Species and Speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Pretoria.
Pélezuelo, L., Meusnier, S., Audiot, P., Bourguet, D., and Ponsard, S. 2007. Assortative mating between European corn borer pheromone races: beyond assortative meeting. PLoS ONE 2:1–10.
Phelan, P. L. 1992. Evolution of sex pheromones and the role of asymmetric tracking. pp. 265–314, in B. D. Roitberg and M. B. Isman (eds.), Insect Chemical Ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York.
Phelan, P. L. 1997. Genetic and phylogenetics in the evolution of sex pheromones, pp. 563–579, in R. T. Cardé and A. K. Minks (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research. Chapman and Hall, New York.CrossRef
Phelan, P. L. 1997b. Evolution of mate-signaling in moths: phylogenetic considerations and predictions from the asymmetric tracking hypothesis. pp. 240–256, in J. C. Choe, and B. J. Crespi, (eds.). The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press.
Roelofs, W. L., Glover, T. J., Tang, X.-H., Sreng, I., Robbins, P., Eckenrode, C. J., Lofstedt, C., Hansson, B. S., and Bengtsson, B. O. 1987. Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths requires both autosomal and sex-linked genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7585–7589.PubMedCrossRef
Sakai, R., Fukuzawa, M., Nakano, R., Tatsuki, S., and Ishikawa, Y. 2009. Alternative suppression of transcription from two desaturase genes is the key for species-specific sex pheromone biosynthesis in two Ostrinia moths. Ins. Biochem. Molec. Biol. 39:62–67.CrossRef
Sreng, I., Glover, T., and Roelofs, W. 1989. Canalization of the redbanded leafroller moth sex pheromone blend. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 10:73–82.CrossRef
- The Response to Selection for Broad Male Response to Female Sex Pheromone and its Implications for Divergence in Close-Range Mating Behavior in the European Corn Borer Moth, Ostrinia nubilalis
Journal of Chemical Ecology
Volume 38, Issue 12 , pp 1504-1512
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Artificial selection
- Flight tunnel
- Mating behavior
- Sex pheromone
- Sexual selection
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Biology, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY, 14456, USA
- 2. Department of Entomology, NYS Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, 14456, USA