Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 449–458

Optimization of a Phenylacetaldehyde-Based Attractant for Common Green Lacewings (Chrysoperla carnea s.l.)

  • Miklós Tóth
  • Ferenc Szentkirályi
  • József Vuts
  • Agostino Letardi
  • Maria Rosaria Tabilio
  • Gunnhild Jaastad
  • Geir K. Knudsen
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10886-009-9614-8

Cite this article as:
Tóth, M., Szentkirályi, F., Vuts, J. et al. J Chem Ecol (2009) 35: 449. doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9614-8

Abstract

In field trapping tests, the catch of Chrysoperla carnea sensu lato (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) increased when acetic acid was added to lures with phenylacetaldehyde. The addition of methyl salicylate to the binary mixture of phenylacetaldehyde plus acetic acid increased catches even further. The ternary blend proved to be more attractive than β-caryophyllene, 2-phenylethanol, or 3-methyl eugenol (compounds previously described as attractants for chrysopids) on their own, and no influence on catches was recorded when these compounds were added as fourth components to the ternary blend. There were minimal changes in activity when (E)-cinnamaldehyde or methyl anthranylate (both evoking large responses from female or male antennae of C. carnea in this study) were added, although both compounds showed significant attraction on their own when compared to unbaited traps. In subtractive field bioassays with the ternary mixture, it appeared that the presence of either phenylacetaldehyde or methyl salicylate was important, whereas acetic acid was less so in the ternary mixture. The ternary blend attracted both female and male lacewings at sites in southern, central, and northern Europe. Possible applications of a synthetic attractant for lacewings are discussed.

Keywords

Acetic acidAttractantChrysoperlaChrysopidaeGreen lacewingsMethyl salicylateNeuropteraPhenylacetaldehyde

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miklós Tóth
    • 1
  • Ferenc Szentkirályi
    • 1
  • József Vuts
    • 1
  • Agostino Letardi
    • 2
  • Maria Rosaria Tabilio
    • 3
  • Gunnhild Jaastad
    • 4
  • Geir K. Knudsen
    • 5
  1. 1.Plant Protection Institute, HASBudapestHungary
  2. 2.ENEA-C.R. Casaccia, Biotec-SICRomeItaly
  3. 3.Centro di Ricerca per la frutticolturaRomeItaly
  4. 4.Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental ResearchBioforsk Vest UllensvangLofthusNorway
  5. 5.Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental ResearchBioforsk Plant Health and Plant ProtectionÅsNorway