Skip to main content
Log in

Interspecific Variation of Floral Scent Composition in Glochidion and its Association with Host-specific Pollinating Seed Parasite (Epicephala)

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trees of the genus Glochidion (Phyllanthaceae) are pollinated by females of Epicephala moths (Gracillariidae) whose larvae consume the seeds of the flowers that they pollinate. Each Epicephala moth species is specific locally to a single host species, although two to four Glochidion hosts often cooccur. To investigate the role of olfactory signals in maintaining the plant−moth specificity, we analyzed floral scent composition of five Glochidion species by using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and conducted Y-tube olfactometer bioassays with Epicephala moths and their host flowers. The GC-MS analysis showed that the floral scents of the five Glochidion species are dominated by (R)-(−)- and (S)-(+)-linalool, and (E)- and (Z)-β-ocimene, and that each species produces 6–20 compounds. Transformation of scent profiles by using chord-normalized expected species shared distances and analysis of the data with nonmetric multidimensional scaling showed that floral volatiles of cooccurring Glochidion species can be distinguished by relative chemical composition, especially that of minor compounds. The bioassay with pollinators of Glochidion lanceolatum and Glochidion ruburm further indicated that Epicephala moths are capable of discriminating their hosts by using floral odor. The results suggest that the floral scent of Glochidion is one of the important key signals that mediate the encounters of the species-specific partners in the GlochidionEpicephala mutualism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, S. and Dobson, H. E. M. 2003. Antennal responses to floral scents in the butterfly Heliconius melpomene. J. Chem. Ecol. 29:2319–2330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S., Nilsson, L. A., Groth, I., and Bergström, G. 2002. Floral scents in butterfly-pollinated plants: possible convergence in chemical composition. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 140:129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckmann, A. C., Bengtsson, M., Borg-Karlsson, A. K., Liblikas, I., and Witzgall, P. 2001. Volatiles from apple (Malus domestica) eliciting antennal responses in female codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): effect of plant injury and sampling technique. Z. Naturforsch. C 56:262–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg-Karlson, A. K., Valterova, I., and Nilsson, L. A. 1994. Volatile compounds from flowers of six species in the family Apiaceae: bouquets for different pollinators? Phytochemistry 35:111–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bossart, J. L. 2003. Covariance of preference and performance on normal and novel hosts in a locally monophagous and locally polyphagous butterfly population. Oecologia 135:477–486.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. 1993. Nonparametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18:117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. M. and Rasplus, J. Y. 2003. Mutualists with attitude: coevolving fig wasps and figs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H. 1965. Check-list of Ficus in Asia and Australasia with keys to identification. Gard. Bull. (Singapore) 21:1–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. W. 1990. Gas chromatographic retention indices of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes on methyl silicone and Carbowax 20 M phases. J. Chromatogr. 503:1–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forister, M. L. 2004. Oviposition preference and larval performance within a diverging lineage of lycaenid butterflies. Ecol. Entomol. 29:264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, E. D. 1999. COMPAH documentation. http://www.es.umb.edu/edgwebp.htm

  • Gancel, A. L., Olle, D., Ollitrault, P., Luro, F., and Brillouet, J. M. 2002. Leaf and peel volatile compounds of an interspecific citrus somatic hybrid [Citrus aurantiflolia (Christm.) Swing. + Citrus paradisi MacFaydan]. Flavour Fragr. J. 17:416–424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, G. and Schill, R. 1991. Composition of orchid scents attracting euglossine bees. Bot. Acta 104:379–391.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Govaerts, R., Frodin, D. G., and Radcliffe-Smith, A. 2000. World checklist and bibliography of Euphorbiaceae. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grison-Pigé, L., Bessière, J. M., and Hossaert-Mckey, M. 2002a. Specific attraction of fig-pollinating wasps: Role of volatile compounds released by tropical figs. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:283–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grison-Pigé, L., Hossaert-Mckey, M., Greeff, J. M., and Bessière, J. M. 2002b. Fig volatile compounds—a first comparative study. Phytochemistry 61:61–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hern, A. and Dorn, S. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in the olfactory orientation of adult Cydia pomonella in response to alpha-farnesene. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 92:63–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herre, E. A. 1989. Coevolution of reproductive characteristics in 12 species of New World figs and their pollinator wasps. Experientia 45:637–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herre, E. A. 1996. An overview of studies on a community of Panamanian figs. J. Biogeogr. 23:593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herre, E. A. and West, S, A. 1997. Conflict of interest in a mutualism: documenting the elusive fig wasp–seed trade-off. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 264:1501–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossaert-Mckey, M., Gibernau, M., and Frey, J. E. 1994. Chemosensory attraction of fig wasps to substances produced by receptive figs. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 70:185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H. 1979. How to be a fig. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:13–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens, A. and Dötterl, S. 2004. Chemical composition of anther volatiles in Ranunculaceae: genera-specific profiles in Anemone, Aquilegia, Caltha, Pulsatilla, Ranunculus, and Trollius species. Am. J. Bot. 91:1969–1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, M., Takimura, A., and Kawakita, A. 2003. An obligate pollination mutualism and reciprocal diversification in the tree genus Glochidion (Euphorbiaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 100:5264–5267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawakita, A. and Kato, M. 2006. Assessment of the diversity and species specificity of the mutualistic association between Epicephala moths and Glochidion trees. Mol. Ecol. 15:3567–3581.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawakita, A., Takimura, A., Terachi, T., Sota, T., and Kato, M. 2004. Cospeciation analysis of an obligate pollination mutualism: Have Glochidion trees (Euphorbiaceae) and pollinating Epicephala moths (Gracillaridae) diversified in parallel? Evolution 58:2201–2214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. T. and Tollsten, L. 1993. Trends in floral scent chemistry in pollination syndromes: floral scent composition in moth-pollinated taxa. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 113:263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. T., Tollsten, L, and Bergströn, L. G. 1993. Floral scents—a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. Phytochemistry 33:253–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Dixon, D. J., Cook, J. M., and Rasplus, J. Y. 2002. Revision of the Australian species of Pleistodontes (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae) fig-pollinating wasps and their host–plant associations. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 136:637–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado, C. A., Jousselin, E., Kjellberg, F., Compton, S. G, and Herre, E. A. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography, and character evolution of fig-pollinating wasps. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268:685–694.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makholela, T. and Manning, J. C. 2006. First report of moth pollination in Struthiola ciliata (Thymelaeaceae) in southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 72:597–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minh Tu, N. T., Onishi, Y., Son, U. S., Ogawa, E., Ukeda, H., and Sawamura, M. 2003. Characteristic odour components of Citrus inflata Hort. ex Tanaka (Mochiyu) cold-pressed peel oil. Flavour Fragr. J. 18:454–459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, T., Yamaoka, R., and Yahara T. 1998. Floral scents of hawkmoth-pollinated flowers in Japan. J. Plant. Res. 111:199–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molbo, D., Machado, C. A., Sevenster, J. G., Keller, L., and Herre, E. A. 2003. Cryptic species of fig-pollinating wasps: implications for the evolution of the fig–wasps mutualism, sex allocation, and precision of adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 100:5867–5872.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nefdt, R. J C. and Compton, S. G. 1996. Regulation of seed and pollinator production in the fig–fig wasp mutualism. J. Anim. Ecol. 65:170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr, O. 2003. Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: a review. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 90:33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr, O., Tang, W., Groth, I., Bergstrom, G., and Thien, L. B. 1991. Cycad cone and angiosperm floral volatiles inferences for the evolution of insect pollination. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 19:623–628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, S., Ervik, F., and Knudsen, J. K. 2004. Floral scent of bat-pollinated species: West Africa vs. the New World. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82:161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, M., Yeo, P., and Lack, A. 1996. The natural history of pollination. Timber Press, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raguso, R. A. and Pellmyr, O. 1998. Dynamic headspace analysis of floral volatiles: a comparison of methods. Oikos 81:238–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raguso, R. A., Light, D. M., and Pichersky, E. 1996. Electroantennogram responses of Hyles lineata (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera) to volatile compounds from Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae) and other moth-pollinated flowers. J. Chem. Ecol. 22:1735–1765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raguso, R. A., Levin, R. A., Foose, S. E., Holmberg, M. W., and Mcdade, L. A. 2003. Fragrance chemistry, nocturnal rhythms and pollination “syndromes” in Nicotiana. Phytochemistry 63:265–284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sagrero-Nieves, L., Bartley, J. P., Espinosa, B. G., Domingues, X. A., and Verde S. J. 1997. Essential oil composition of Aristolochia brevipes Benth. Flavour Fragr. J. 12:401–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. C., Ng, D., and Thomas, C. D. 1988. Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution 42:977–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Q., Yang, D., Zhang, G., and Yang, C. 2001. Volatiles from Ficus hispida and their attractiveness to fig wasps. J. Chem. Ecol. 27:1929–1942.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G. P., Hickman, M. O., Bartram, S., Boland, W., Pellmyr, O., and Raguso, R. A. 2005. Chemistry and geographic variation of floral scent in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae). Am. J. Bot. 92:1624–1631.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, M. A. and Joern, A. 1999. Performance tradeoffs for two hosts within and between populations of the oligophagous grasshopper Hesperotettix viridis (Acrididae). Oikos 87:239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueblood, D. D., Gallagher, E. D., and Gould, D. M. 1994. Three stages of seasonal succession on the Savin Hill Cove mudflat, Boston Harbor. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39:1440–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S. 1986. Genetic covariance between oviposition preference and larval performance in an insect herbivore. Evolution 40:778–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, A. B. and Compton, S. G. 1994. Responses of fig wasps to host plant volatile cues. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:785–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiblen, G. D. 2002. How to be a fig wasp. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 47:299–330.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiblen, G. D. 2004. Correlated evolution in fig pollination. Syst. Biol. 53:128–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiblen, G. D. and Bush, G. L. 2002. Speciation in fig pollinators and parasites. Mol. Ecol. 11:1573–1578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiblen, G. D., Yu, D. W., and Stuart, S. A. 2001. Pollination and parasitism in functionally dioecious figs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268:651–659.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama, J. 2003. Cospeciation of figs and fig-wasps: a case study of endemic species pairs in the Ogasawara Islands. Popul. Ecol. 45:249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Y. Inui for providing the opportunity to conduct this study; T. Y. Chiang, T. W. Hsu, and S. C. Liu for assistance in the field in Taiwan; Y. Yamaoka and I. Shimizu for allowing us to use the GC and GC-MS; Y. Kumano and N. Fujiwara-Tsujii for technical advice in collecting and analyzing the floral scents; and the subject editor and anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 15370012 from Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (to M. K.) and by Grant for Basic Science Research Project from Sumitomo Foundation (to T. O.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoko Okamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okamoto, T., Kawakita, A. & Kato, M. Interspecific Variation of Floral Scent Composition in Glochidion and its Association with Host-specific Pollinating Seed Parasite (Epicephala). J Chem Ecol 33, 1065–1081 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9287-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9287-0

Keywords

Navigation