February 2013, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 135-148
Date: 17 Nov 2012
The Effect of Noncontingent Positive Versus Negative Reinforcement on Multiply Controlled Behavior During Discrete Trial Training
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Challenging behaviors with multiple functions are often difficult to treat as function-based treatments may interfere with one another. Noncontingent reinforcement may be one efficient and effective means of treating multiply controlled behavior. The purposes of this study were to compare the use of noncontingent tangible reinforcement (NCT) to noncontingent escape (NCE) with two young children with autism who engaged in multiply controlled challenging behavior. Second, we wished to examine the effect of NCT and NCE on compliance during discrete trial training. A reversal design with an embedded alternating treatment design was used to compare NCT and NCE. The NCT treatment resulted in greater reductions of challenging behavior than the NCE treatment for both participants. Compliance during discrete trial training increased under both NCT and NCE treatments.
Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9(3), 1–19. doi:10.1177/0145445501255004.
Carr, J. E., Coriaty, S., Wilder, D. A., Gaunt, B. T., Dozier, C. L., Britton, L. N., & Reed, C. L. (2000). A review of “noncontingent” reinforcement as treatment for the aberrant behavior of individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 377–391. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(00)00050-0.PubMedCrossRef
Cook, C. R., Mayer, G. R., Wright, D. B., Kraemer, B., Wallace, M. D., Dart, E., Collins, T., & Restori, A. (2012). Exploring the link among behavior intervention plans, treatment integrity, and student outcomes under natural educational conditions. Journal of Special Education, 46, 3–16.CrossRef
Fisher, W. W., DeLeon, I. G., Rodriguez-Catter, V., & Keeney, K. M. (2004). Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 239–242. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-171.CrossRef
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197 (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).PubMedCrossRef
Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Mildon, R. L., Moore, D. W., & Dixon, R. S. (2004). Combining noncontingent escape and functional communication training as a treatment for negatively reinforced disruptive behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 92–102. Retrieved from: http://www.autismservicesnorth.com/wp-content/uploads/combining-noncontingent-escape-and-functional-communication-training.pdf.
Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (2010). Childhood Autism Rating Scale (2nd ed.). Torrence: Western Psychological Services.
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. (1999). Functional-assessment-based behavior support planning: Research-to-practice-to-research. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 223–227. Retrieved from: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/10198430/functional-assessment-based-behavior-support-planning-research-practice-research.
- The Effect of Noncontingent Positive Versus Negative Reinforcement on Multiply Controlled Behavior During Discrete Trial Training
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities
Volume 25, Issue 1 , pp 135-148
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Challenging behavior
- Discrete trial training
- Multiple functions
- Noncontingent reinforcement