A Comparison of Graphical and Textual Presentations of Time Series Data to Support Medical Decision Making in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Objective. To compare expert-generated textual summaries of physiological data with trend graphs, in terms of their ability to support neonatal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) staff in making decisions when presented with medical scenarios. Methods. Forty neonatal ICU staff were recruited for the experiment, eight from each of five groups – junior, intermediate and senior nurses, junior and senior doctors. The participants were presented with medical scenarios on a computer screen, and asked to choose from a list of 18 possible actions those they thought were appropriate. Half of the scenarios were presented as trend graphs, while the other half were presented as passages of text. The textual summaries had been generated by two human experts and were intended to describe the physiological state of the patient over a short period of time (around 40 minutes) but not to interpret it. Results. In terms of the content of responses there was a clear advantage for the Text condition, with participants tending to choose more of the appropriate actions when the information was presented as text rather than as graphs. In terms of the speed of response there was no difference between the Graphs and Text conditions. There was no significant difference between the staff groups in terms of speed or content of responses. In contrast to the objective measures of performance, the majority of participants reported a subjective preference for the Graphs condition. Conclusions. In this experimental task, participants performed better when presented with a textual summary of the medical scenario than when it was presented as a set of trend graphs. If the necessary algorithms could be developed that would allow computers automatically to generate descriptive summaries of physiological data, this could potentially be a useful feature of decision support tools in the intensive care unit.
- Green CA, Gilhooly KJ, Logie RH, Ross DG. Human factors and computerisation in Intensive Care Units: A review. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1991; 8: 167–178. CrossRef
- Hanson CW, Marshall BE. Artificial intelligence applications in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 427–435. CrossRef
- Alberdi E, Gilhooly K, Hunter J, Logie R, Lyon A, McIntosh N, et al. Computerisation and decision making in neonatal intensive care: A cognitive engineering investigation. J Clin Mont Comput 2000; 16: 85–94. CrossRef
- Ambroso C, Bowes C, Chambrin MC, Gilhooly K, Green C, Kari A, et al. INFORM: European survey of computers in Intensive Care Units. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1992; 9: 53–61. CrossRef
- Cunningham S, Deere S, Symon A, Elton RA, McIntosh N. A randomized, controlled trial of computerized physiologic trend monitoring in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 2053–2059. CrossRef
- McIntosh N, Lyon A, Badger P. Time trend monitoring in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Why doesn't it make a difference? Pediatrics 1996; 98:540.
- Alberdi E, Becher JC, Gilhooly K, Hunter J, Logie RH, Lyon A et al. Expertise and the interpretation of computerized physiological data: implications for the design of computerized monitoring in neonatal intensive care. Int J Hum-Comput St 2001; 55: 191–216. CrossRef
- Ewing G, Freer Y, Logie RH, Hunter J, McIntosh N, Rudkin S, et al. Role and experience determine decision support interface requirements in a neonatal intensive care environment. J Biomed Inform 2003; 36: 240–249. CrossRef
- Freer Y, Ferguson L, Ewing G, Hunter J, Logie RH, Rudkin S et al. Mismatched concepts in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU): Further issues for computer decision support? J Clin Monit Comput 2003; 17: 441–447. CrossRef
- Hunter J. The Time Series Workbench: User Manual, University of Aberdeen Computing Science Technical Report, 2004
- Ewing G, Ferguson L, Freer Y, Hunter J, McIntosh N. Observational data acquired on a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. University of Aberdeen Computing Science Departmental Technical Report: TR 0205, 2002.
- Hunter JRW, Ferguson L, Freer Y, Ewing G, Logie R, McCue P, et al. The NEONATE Database. Workshop on Intelligent Data Analysis in Medicine and Pharmacology and Knowledge-Based Information Management in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AIME-03, Cyprus, 2003, pp 21–24.
- Benbasat I, Dexter AS, Todd P. The influence of color and graphical information presentation in a managerial decision simulation. Human-Computer Interaction 1986; 2: 65–92.
- Wright P, Jansen C, Wyatt JC. How to limit clinical errors in interpretation of data. The Lancet 1998; 352: 1539– 1543. CrossRef
- Somayajulu G, Sripada S, Reiter E, Hunter J, Yu J. Summarizing neonatal time series data. In: Proceedings of the research note sessions of the EACL03, Budapest, 2003, pp. 167–170.
- A Comparison of Graphical and Textual Presentations of Time Series Data to Support Medical Decision Making in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Volume 19, Issue 3 , pp 183-194
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- intensive care
- computerised monitoring
- decision making
- decision support
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, U.K.
- 2. Department of Neonatology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, U.K.
- 3. Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, U.K.
- 4. Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, U.K.