Cooperative Learning Contingencies: Unrelated versus Related Individual and Group Contingencies
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
College students operating under related cooperative contingencies (students had to earn individual credit before being considered for group credit) showed more consistent individual and group improvement on exam performance than students operating under unrelated contingencies (individual credit and group credit were independently determined). A balanced ratio between individual and group credit proved to be the most productive ratio under the related contingency, whereas a ratio favoring group credit over individual credit proved most productive under the unrelated contingency. In general, a ratio favoring individual credit over group credit was the least productive in promoting both individual and group improvement under both unrelated and related contingencies. The findings showed less difference in improvement of exam scores for students of different performance levels than had been evident in previous research.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
- Ebert-May, D., Brewer, C., & Allred, S. (1997). Innovation in large lectures: Teaching for active learning. Bioscience, 47, 601–607. CrossRef
- Ferguson, G. A., & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38, 67–73. CrossRef
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30, 26–35.
- Slavin, R. E. (1987). Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: A reconciliation. Child Development, 55, 1131–1137.
- Slavin, R. E. (1991, February). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, pp. 72–81.
- Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69. CrossRef
- Stockdale, S. L., & Williams, R. L. (2004). Cooperative Learning at the college level: Differential effects on high, average, and low performers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 37–50. CrossRef
- Williams, R. L., Carroll, E., & Hautau, B. (2005). Individual accountability in cooperative learning groups at the college level: Differential effects on high, average, and low performers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 167–188. CrossRef
- Cooperative Learning Contingencies: Unrelated versus Related Individual and Group Contingencies
Journal of Behavioral Education
Volume 15, Issue 4 , pp 191-202
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Cooperative learning
- Individual contingencies
- Group contingencies