Explaining Quantity Implicatures
We give derivations of two formal models of Gricean Quantity implicature and strong exhaustivity in bidirectional optimality theory and in a signalling games framework. We show that, under a unifying model based on signalling games, these interpretative strategies are game-theoretic equilibria when the speaker is known to be respectively minimally and maximally expert in the matter at hand. That is, in this framework the optimal strategy for communication depends on the degree of knowledge the speaker is known to have concerning the question she is answering. In addition, and most importantly, we give a game-theoretic characterisation of the interpretation rule Grice (formalising Quantity implicature), showing that under natural conditions this interpretation rule occurs in the unique equilibrium play of the signalling game.
- Benz, A., Jäger, G., Rooij, R. eds. (2006) Game theory and pragmatics. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke
- Blutner, R. (2000) Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17: pp. 189-216 CrossRef
- Gärdenfors, P. (2000) Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Gazdar, G. (1979) Pragmatics. Academic Press, London
- Grice, H. P. (1967). Logic and conversation. The William James lectures, delivered at Harvard University. Republished with revisions in Grice, 1989.
- Horn, L. R. (1972). The semantics of logical operators in English. PhD thesis, Yale University.
- Ifantidou, E. (2001) Evidentials and relevance, volume 86 of pragmatics & beyond new series. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
- Jäger, G. (2007) The evolution of convex categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: pp. 551-564 CrossRef
- Keenan, E. O. On the universality of conversational implicatures. In: Fasold, R. W., Shuy, R. W. eds. (1977) Studies in language variation: Semantics, syntax, phonology, pragmatics, social situations, ethnographic approaches. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp. 255-269
- Levinson, S. C. (2000) Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicatures. Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Lewis, D. K. (1969) Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
- Parikh, P. (2001) The use of language. csli Publications, Stanford, California
- Sauerland, U. (2004) Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: pp. 367-391 CrossRef
- Schulz, K., Rooij, R. (2006) Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: pp. 205-250 CrossRef
- Spector, B. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean reasoning? In B. ten Cate (Ed.), Proceedings of the eighth ESSLLI student session, Vienna, Austria.
- Thijsse, E. On some proposed universals of natural language. In: Meulen, A. G. B. eds. (1983) Studies in modeltheoretic semantics. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 19-36
- Van Benthem, J. F. A. K. (1986) Essays in logical semantics. Reidel, Dordrecht CrossRef
- Van Rooij, R., Schulz, K. (2004) Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13: pp. 491-519 CrossRef
- Explaining Quantity Implicatures
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
Volume 21, Issue 4 , pp 461-477
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Conversational implicatures
- Game theory