Journal of Logic, Language and Information

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 461–477

Explaining Quantity Implicatures

Authors

    • Institute for Logic, Language and ComputationUniversiteit van Amsterdam
  • Tikitu de Jager
    • Institute for Logic, Language and ComputationUniversiteit van Amsterdam
Open AccessArticle

DOI: 10.1007/s10849-012-9163-3

Cite this article as:
van Rooij, R. & de Jager, T. J of Log Lang and Inf (2012) 21: 461. doi:10.1007/s10849-012-9163-3
  • 596 Views

Abstract

We give derivations of two formal models of Gricean Quantity implicature and strong exhaustivity in bidirectional optimality theory and in a signalling games framework. We show that, under a unifying model based on signalling games, these interpretative strategies are game-theoretic equilibria when the speaker is known to be respectively minimally and maximally expert in the matter at hand. That is, in this framework the optimal strategy for communication depends on the degree of knowledge the speaker is known to have concerning the question she is answering. In addition, and most importantly, we give a game-theoretic characterisation of the interpretation rule Grice (formalising Quantity implicature), showing that under natural conditions this interpretation rule occurs in the unique equilibrium play of the signalling game.

Keywords

Conversational implicaturesPragmaticsGame theory
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012