Skip to main content
Log in

Speciation in Behavioral Space for Evolutionary Robotics

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Evolutionary Robotics, population-based evolutionary computation is used to design robot neurocontrollers that produce behaviors which allow the robot to fulfill a user-defined task. However, the standard approach is to use canonical evolutionary algorithms, where the search tends to make the evolving population converge towards a single behavioral solution, even if the high-level task could be accomplished by structurally different behaviors. In this work, we present an approach that preserves behavioral diversity within the population in order to produce a diverse set of structurally different behaviors that the robot can use. In order to achieve this, we employ the concept of speciation, where the population is dynamically subdivided into sub-groups, or species, each one characterized by a particular behavioral structure that all individuals within that species share. Speciation is achieved by describing each neurocontroller using a representations that we call a behavior signature, these are descriptors that characterize the traversed path of the robot within the environment. Behavior signatures are coded using character strings, this allows us to compare them using a string similarity measure, and three measures are tested. The proposed behavior-based speciation is compared with canonical evolution and a method that speciates based on network topology. Experimental tests were carried out using two robot tasks (navigation and homing behavior), several training environments, and two different robots (Khepera and Pioneer), both real and simulated. Results indicate that behavior-based speciation increases the diversity of the behaviors based on their structure, without sacrificing performance. Moreover, the evolved controllers exhibit good robustness when the robot is placed within environments that were not used during training. In conclusion, the speciation method presented in this work allows an evolutionary algorithm to produce several robot behaviors that are structurally different but all are able to solve the same robot task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coello, C., Veldhuizen, D.V., Lamont, G.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Darwen, P.J., Yao, X.: Speciation as automatic categorical modularization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 1(2), 101–108 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeJong, K.A.: Evolutionary Computation: A Unified Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorigo, M., Stützle, T.: Ant Colony Optimization. Bradford Company, Scituate, MA, USA (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn, E., Olague, G., Lutton, E.: Parisian camera placement for vision metrology. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27(11), 1209–1219 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eberhart, R.C., Shi, Y., Kennedy, J.: Swarm Intelligence, 1st edn. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Evolutionary Computation, Morgan Kaufmann (2001)

  7. Floreano, D., Mattiussi, C.: Bio-inspired Artificial Intelligence: Theories, Methods and Technologies. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Floreano, D., Sanderson, F.M.A.C.: Evolution of homing navigation in a real mobile robot. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 26(3), 396–407 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg, D.E., Richardson, J.: Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms on Genetic algorithms and their Application, pp. 41–49. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, USA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez, F.J., Miikkulainen, R.: Solving non-Markovian control tasks with neuro-evolution. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 99, pp. 1356–1361. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hocaoǧlu, C., Sanderson, A.C.: Planning multiple paths with evolutionary speciation. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 5(3), 169–191 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Landrin-Schweitzer, Y., Collet, P., Lutton, E., Prost, T.: Introducing lateral thinking in search engines with interactive evolutionary algorithms. In: SAC ’03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 214–219. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahfoud, S.W.: Niching methods for genetic algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA (1995)

  14. Martin, P., Bateson, P.: Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mattiussi, C., Waibel, M., Floreano, D.: Measures of diversity for populations and distances between individuals with highly reorganizable genomes. Evol. Comput. 12(4), 495–515 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Michel, O.: Khepera Simulator v. 2 User Manual. University of Nice-Sophia, Antipolis (1996)

  17. Miglino, O., Lund, H.H., Nolfi, S.: Evolving mobile robots in simulated and real environments. Artif. Life 2(4), 417–434 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Montana, D.J., Davis, L.: Training feedforward neural networks using genetic algorithms. In: Sridharan, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 762–767. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, California (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moriarty, D.E., Mikkulainen, R.: Efficient reinforcement learning through symbiotic evolution. Mach. Learn. 22(1–3), 11–32 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, Q.H., Ong, Y.S., Lim, M.H.: A probabilistic memetic framework. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13, 604–623 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nitschke, G., Schut, M.: Designing multi-rover emergent specialization. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2008). ACM Press (2008)

  22. Nolfi, S., Floreano, D.: Evolutionary Robotics: the Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-Organizing Machines. Bradford Book (2004)

  23. Ong, Y.S., Lim, M.H., Chen, X.: Research frontier: memetic computation-past, present & future. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 5, 24–31 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pollack, J.B., Blair, A.D.: Co-evolution in the successful learning of backgammon strategy. Mach. Learn. 32(1), 225–240 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Potter, M.: The design and analysis of a computational model of cooperative coevolution. Ph.D. thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA (1997)

  26. Price, K., Storn, R.M., Lampinen, J.A.: Differential Evolution: a Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosca, J.: Hierarchical learning with procedural abstraction mechanisms. Ph.D. thesis, Rochester, NY, USA (1997)

  28. Savage, T.: Measurement and the explanation of adaptive and novel behaviors in real and artificial creatures. Cogn. Syst. Res. 5(1), 3–39 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stanley, K.O., Miikkulainen, R.: Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evol. Comput. 10(2), 99–127 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Trujillo, L., Olague, G., Lutton, E., de Vega, F.F.: Discovering several robot behaviors through speciation. In: Giacobini, M., et al. (eds.) EvoWorkshops: the 4th European Workshop on Bio-inspired Heuristics for Design Automation (EvoHOT’07). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4974, pp. 164–174, 26–28 March, Napoli, Italy, Springer (best paper award) (2008)

  31. Viola, P.A., Jones, M.J.: Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In: Proceeding from the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2001), pp. 511–518, 8–14 December, Kauai, HI, USA. IEEE Computer Society (2001)

  32. Yujian, L., Bo, L.: A normalized levenshtein distance metric. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29(6), 1091–1095 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Trujillo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trujillo, L., Olague, G., Lutton, E. et al. Speciation in Behavioral Space for Evolutionary Robotics. J Intell Robot Syst 64, 323–351 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9542-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9542-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation