Skip to main content
Log in

Dabigatran versus warfarin anticoagulation before and after catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Systemic thromboembolism and bleeding remain the two most common and serious complications of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. A variety of periprocedure anticoagulation strategies have been proposed to mitigate these risks. Although operators are now routinely administering dabigatran for anticoagulation in this setting, its relative safety and effectiveness compared to warfarin are unknown.

Methods and results

A total of 202 patients received dabigatran as part of their periprocedural anticoagulation regimen at the time of initial or redo catheter ablation for symptomatic atrial fibrillation. A comparison group of 202 patients treated with warfarin was randomly selected from patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation during the same time period. AF types were paroxysmal in 223 patients, persistent in 158 patients, and longstanding persistent in 13 patients. Mean age was 60.0 ± 10.5 years, 55 % had a history of hypertension, and mean CHADS-VASc score was 1.7 ± 1.3. “Continuous” warfarin or dabigatran was administered in 80 and 32 % of patients, respectively. Time to first dose of dabigatran post-procedure was 12.2 ± 10.3 h. Two dabigatran and no warfarin-treated patients had systemic thromboembolism (p = NS); five dabigatran and three warfarin-treated patients had bleeding complications (p = NS, combined endpoint p = 0.116). One dabigatran patient had severe pericardial bleeding (3 L blood loss).

Conclusions

In a retrospective pilot trial comparing the risks of systemic thromboembolism or bleeding complications in patients treated with warfarin or dabigatran anticoagulation, the outcomes were similar. A prospective trial is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D; Heart Rhythm Society Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9:632–696.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sorgente, A., Chierchia, G. B., de Asmundis, C., Sarkozy, A., Capulzini, L., & Brugada, P. (2011). Complications of atrial fibrillation ablation: when prevention is better than cure. Europace, 13, 1526–1532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohnen, M., Stevenson, W. G., Tedrow, U. B., Michaud, G. F., John, R. M., Epstein, L. M., et al. (2011). Incidence and predictors of major complications from contemporary catheter ablation to treat cardiac arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm, 8, 1661–1666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S. A., Davies, W., Iesaka, Y., Kalman, J., et al. (2010). Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 3, 32–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oral, H., Chugh, A., Ozaydin, M., Good, E., Fortino, J., Sankaran, S., et al. (2006). Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 114, 759–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scherr, D., Sharma, K., Dalal, D., Spragg, D., Chilukuri, K., Cheng, A., et al. (2009). Incidence and predictors of periprocedural cerebrovascular accident in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20, 1357–1363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaita, F., Caponi, D., Pianelli, M., Scaglione, M., Toso, E., Cesarani, F., et al. (2010). Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a cause of silent thromboembolism? Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cerebral thromboembolism in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 122, 1667–1673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrera Siklody, C., Deneke, T., Hocini, M., Lehrmann, H., Shin, D. I., Miyazaki, S., et al. (2011). Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, 681–688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoyt, H., Bhonsale, A., Chilukuri, K., Alhumaid, F., Needleman, M., Edwards, D., et al. (2011). Complications arising from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: temporal trends and predictors. Heart Rhythm, 8, 1869–1874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baman, T. S., Jongnarangsin, K., Chugh, A., Suwanagool, A., Guiot, A., Madenci, A., et al. (2011). Prevalence and predictors of complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 22, 626–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ren, J. F., Marchlinski, F. E., Callans, D. J., Gerstenfeld, E. P., Dixit, S., Lin, D., et al. (2005). Increased intensity of anticoagulation may reduce risk of thrombus during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures in patients with spontaneous echo contrast. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 16, 474–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wazni, O. M., Beheiry, S., Fahmy, T., Barrett, C., Hao, S., Patel, D., et al. (2007). Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with therapeutic international normalized ratio: comparison of strategies of anticoagulation management in the periprocedural period. Circulation, 116, 2531–2534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hakalahti, A., Uusimaa, P., Ylitalo, K., & Raatikainen, M. J. (2011). Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with therapeutic oral anticoagulation treatment. Europace, 13, 640–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Winkle, R. A., Mead, R. H., Engel, G., Kong, M. H., & Patrawala, R. A. (2012). The use of dabigatran immediately after atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23, 264–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khairy, P., Chauvet, P., Lehmann, J., Lambert, J., Macle, L., Tanguay, J. F., et al. (2003). Lower incidence of thrombus formation with cryoenergy versus radiofrequency catheter ablation. Circulation, 107, 2045–2050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grimm, R. A., Stewart, W. J., Maloney, J. D., Cohen, G. I., Pearce, G. L., Salcedo, E. E., et al. (1993). Impact of electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation on left atrial appendage function and spontaneous echo contrast: characterization by simultaneous transesophageal echocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22, 1359–1366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sparks, P. B., Jayaprakash, S., Mond, H. G., Vohra, J. K., Grigg, L. E., & Kalman, J. M. (1999). Left atrial mechanical function after brief duration atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 33, 342–349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stangier, J. (2008). Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 47, 285–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Battinelli, E. M. (2011). Reversal of new oral anticoagulants. Circulation, 124, 1508–1510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Connolly, S. J., Ezekowitz, M. D., Yusuf, S., Eikelboom, J., Oldgren, J., Parekh, A., et al. (2009). Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1139–1151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pradaxa [package insert]. Ridgefield, CT: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. May 2012. http://bidocs.boehringer-ingelheim.com/BIWebAccess/ViewServlet.ser?docBase=renetnt&folderPath=/Prescribing%20Information/PIs/Pradaxa/Pradaxa.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2012.

  22. Di Biase, L., Burkhardt, J. D., Mohanty, P., Sanchez, J., Horton, R., Gallinghouse, G. J., et al. (2010). Periprocedural stroke and management of major bleeding complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the impact of periprocedural therapeutic international normalized ratio. Circulation, 121, 2550–2556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Santangeli, P., Di Biase, L., Horton, R., Burkhardt, J. D., Sanchez, J., Al-Ahmad, A., et al. (2012). Ablation of atrial fibrillation under therapeutic warfarin reduces periprocedural complications: evidence from a meta-analysis. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 5, 302–311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ren, J. F., Marchlinski, F. E., & Callans, D. J. (2004). Left atrial thrombus associated with ablation for atrial fibrillation: identification with intracardiac echocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43, 1861–1867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van Ryn, J., Stangier, J., Haertter, S., Liesenfeld, K. H., Wienen, W., Feuring, M., et al. (2010). Dabigatran etexilate—a novel, reversible, oral direct thrombin inhibitor: interpretation of coagulation assays and reversal of anticoagulant activity. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 103, 1116–1127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, Y. M., Di Biase, L., Vanga, S. R., Santangeli, P., Swarup, V., et al. (2012). Feasibility and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59, 1168–1174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bauer, K. A. (2011). Recent progress in anticoagulant therapy: oral direct inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 9(Suppl 1), 12–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, J. S., She, F., Jongnarangsin, K., Chugh, A., Latchamsetty, R., Ghanbari, H., et al. (2012). Dabigatran vs warfarin for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm.

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Haines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haines, D.E., Mead-Salley, M., Salazar, M. et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin anticoagulation before and after catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 37, 233–239 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9800-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9800-z

Keywords

Navigation