Incorporating the patient perspective: a critical review of clinical practice guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for patients with heart failure and/or ventricular arrhythmias at risk of sudden cardiac death. Guidelines for ICD implantation are derived from robust clinical data. However, critical factors which might influence treatment decisions include patient preferences. We set out to determine how clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) incorporate the patient perspective into supporting decision making about ICDs.
CPGs on ICD implantation were purposively selected from national and professional bodies in Europe, North America and Australasia. CPGs were then appraised according to three key domains of shared decision making: (a) informing patients about the risks, benefits and consequences known to be important to patients; (b) personalising risks and benefits and (c) involvement of patient (plus family/significant others if desired) in decision making.
Appraisal of six current CPGs found major deficiencies or inconsistencies in guidance. CPGs tended to focus on evidence of device effectiveness, with sparse consideration of other outcomes important to patients such as impacts on quality of life and psychosocial well-being. Little reference was made to involvement of the patient in decision making.
This suggests that embedding shared decision in CPGs will improve the patient-centeredness of ICD treatment by enabling patients to make informed, value-based decisions. Specific recommendations for CPG development include the need for signposting to preference sensitive decision points as well as inclusion of a broader range of outcomes which are known to be important to patients when deciding whether or not to have a device fitted.
- Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312, 71–72.
- Institute of Medicine. (1990). In M. J. Field & K. N. Lohr (Eds.), Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Stacey, D., Bennett, C. L., Barry, M. J., Col, N. F., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., et al. (2011). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (10): p. Art. No.: CD001431.
- Salzburg Global Seminar. (2011). Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ, 342, d1745. CrossRef
- Towle, A., & Godolphin, W. (1999). Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ, 319, 766. CrossRef
- O’Connor, A. M., Wennberg, J. E., Legare, F., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., Moulton, B. W., & Sepucha, K. R. (2007). Toward the “tipping point”: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Affairs (Millwood), 26, 716–725. CrossRef
- Elwyn, G., Laitner, S., Coulter, A., Walker, E., Watson, P., & Thomson, R. (2010). Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ, 341, c5146. CrossRef
- Godolphin, W. (2003). The role of risk communication in shared decision making. BMJ, 327, 692. CrossRef
- Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Atwell, C., Hood, K., Houston, H., & Kinnersley, P. (2004). Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomised trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Family Practice, 21, 347–354. CrossRef
- Alonso-Coello, P., Montori, V. M., Sola, I., Schünemann, H. J., Devereaux, P. J., Charelese, C., et al. (2008). Values and preferences in oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, physicians’ and patients’ perspectives: protocol for a two-phase study. BMC Health Services Research, 8, 221. CrossRef
- Grol, R., & van Weel, C. (2009). Getting a grip on guidelines: how to make them more relevant for practice. British Journal of General Practice, 59, 322–328. CrossRef
- van der Weijden, T., Légaré, F., Boivin, A., Burgers, J. S., van Veenendaal, H., Stiggelbout, A. M., et al. (2010). How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol. Implementation Science, 5, 10. CrossRef
- Thomson, R. G., Parkin, D., Eccles, M., Sudlow, M., & Robinson, A. (2000). Decision analysis and guidelines for anticoagulant therapy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Lancet, 355, 956–962. CrossRef
- Boivin, A., Currie, K., Fervers, B., Gracia, J., James, M., Marshall, C., et al. (2010). Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 19(5), e22. CrossRef
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2009). Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment. (NICE clinical guideline no. 80). London: National Collaborating Centre for Cancer.
- Galla, J. H. (2000). Clinical practice guideline on shared decision-making in the appropriate initiation of and withdrawal from dialysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 11, 1340–1342.
- Brindis, R., & Spertus, J. A. (2010). Employing shared decision-making models to improve care and patient value: a cardiovascular professional initiative. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 56(24), 2046–2048. CrossRef
- Walsh, M. N., Bove, A. A., Cross, R. R., Ferdinand, K. C., Forman, D. E., Freeman, A. M., et al. (2012). ACCF 2012 health policy statement on patient-centred care in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59(23), 2125–2143. CrossRef
- Allen, L. A., Stevenson, L. W., Grady, K. L., Goldstein, N. E., Matlock, D. D., Arnold, R. M., et al. (2012). Decision making in advanced heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 125(15), 1928–1952. CrossRef
- Redhead, A. P., Turkington, D., Rao, S., Tynan, M. M., & Bourke, J. P. (2010). Psychopathology in postinfarction patients implanted with cardioverter-defibrillators for secondary prevention. A cross-sectional, case-controlled study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(6), 555–563. CrossRef
- Mark, D. B., Anstrom, K. J., Sun, J. L., Clapp-Channing, N. E., Tsiatis, A. A., Davidson-Ray, L., et al. (2008). Sudden cardiac death in heart failure trial investigators, quality of life with defibrillator therapy or amiodarone in heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 999–1008. CrossRef
- Nazarian, S., Maisel, W. H., Miles, J. S., Tsang, S., Stevenson, L. W., & Stevenson, W. G. (2005). Impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators on survival and recurrent hospitalization in advanced heart failure. American Heart Journal, 150, 955–960. CrossRef
- Matlock, D. D., Nowels, C. T., Masoudi, F. A., Sauer, W. H., Bekelman, D. B., Main, D. S., et al. (2011). Patient and cardiologist perceptions on decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a qualitative study. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 34(12), 1634–1644. CrossRef
- Langseth, M. S., Shepherd, E., Thomson, R., & Lord, S. (2012). Quality of decision making is related to decision outcome for patients with cardiac arrhythmia. Patient Education and Counseling, 87, 49–53. CrossRef
- Stevenson, L. W., & Desai, A. S. (2006). Selecting patients for discussion of the ICD as primary prevention for sudden death in heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 12(6), 407–412. CrossRef
- Al-Khatib, S., Hellkamp, A., Curtis, J., Mark, D., Peterson, E., Sanders, G. D., et al. (2011). Non-evidence-based ICD implantations in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 305(1), 43–49.
- Matlock, D. D., Peterson, P. N., Heidenreich, P. A., Lucas, F. L., Malenka, D. J., Wang, Y., et al. (2011). Regional variation in the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 4(1), 114–121.
- McComb, J. M., Plummer, C. J., Cunningham, M. W., & Cunningham, D. (2009). Inequity of access to implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in England: possible causes of geographical variation in implantation rates. Europace, 11, 1308–1312. CrossRef
- Epstein, A. E., DiMarco, J. P., Ellenbogen, K. A., Estes, N. A. 3rd, Freedman, R. A., Gettes, L. S., et al. (2008). ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. Circulation, 117(21), e350–e408.
- Tang, A. S., Ross, H., Simpson, C. S., Mitchell, L. B., Dorian, P., Goeree, R., et al. (2005). Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society position paper on implantable cardioverter defibrillator use in Canada. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 21(Suppl A), 11A–18A.
- Hauer, R. N. W., Aliot, E., Block, M., Capucci, A., Lüderitz, B., Santini, M., et al. (2001). Indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Study Group on Guidelines on ICDs of the Working Group on Arrhythmias and the Working Group on Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal, 22, 1074–1081.
- National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (Chronic Heart Failure Guidelines Expert Writing Panel), Guidelines for the prevention, detection and management of chronic heart failure in Australia. Updated October 2011.
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006). Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators for arrhythmias.
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Cardiac arrhythmias in coronary heart disease. A national clinical guideline, S.I.G. Network, Editor 2007: Edinburgh.
- Dickstein, K., Vardas, P. E., Auricchio, A., Daubert, J.-C., Linde, C., McMurray, J., et al. (2010). Focused update of ESC guidelines on device therapy in heart failure. European Heart Journal, 31(21), 2677–2687.
- Pettit, S. J., Browne, S., Hogg, K. J., Connelly, D. T., Gardner, R. S., May, C. R., et al. (2012). ICDs in end-stage heart failure. BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, 2, 94–97. CrossRef
- O'Connor, A. M., Légaré, F., & Stacey, D. (2003). Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ, 327, 736–740. CrossRef
- Van Den Broek, K. C., Habibović, M., & Pedersen, S. S. (2010). Emotional distress in partners of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a systematic review and recommendations for future research. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 33(12), 1442–1450. CrossRef
- Sears, S. F., & Conti, J. B. (2002). Quality of life and psychological functioning of ICD patients. Heart, 87, 488–493. CrossRef
- Sears, S. F., Hauf, J. D., Kirian, K., Hazelton, G., & Conti, J. B. (2011). Posttraumatic stress and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patient: what the electrophysiologist needs to know. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 4, 242–250. CrossRef
- Mühlhauser, I. (2010). From authority recommendations to fact-sheets—a future for guidelines. Diabetologia, 53, 2285–2288. CrossRef
- Hegarty, K., Gunn, J., Blashki, G., Griffiths, F., Dowell, T., & Kendrick, T. (2009). How could depression guidelines be made more relevant and applicable to primary care? British Journal of General Practice, 59, 322–328.
- Johansson, I., & Strömberg, A. (2010). Experiences of driving and driving restrictions in recipients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator—the patient perspective. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 25(6), E1–E10.
- Lemon, J., Edelman, S., & Kirkness, A. (2004). Avoidance behaviour in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Heart & Lung, 33, 176–182. CrossRef
- Bostwick, J. M., & Sola, C. L. (2011). An updated review of implantable cardioverter/defibrillators, induced anxiety, and quality of life. Heart Failure Clinics, 7(1), 101–108. CrossRef
- van der Weijden, B. A., Burgers, J., Schunemann, H. J., & Elwyn, G. (2012). Clinical practice guidelines and patient decision aids. An inevitable relationship. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(6), 584–589. CrossRef
- Gigerenzer, G. (2002). How innumeracy can be exploited, in Reckoning with risk—learning to live with uncertainty (pp. 201–210). London: Penguin Press.
- Elwyn, G., O'Connor, A. M., Bennett, C., Newcombe, R. G., Politi, M., Durand, M., et al. (2009). Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One, 4(3), e4705.
- Stiggelbout, A. M., van der Weijden, T., De Wit, M. P. T., Frosch, D., Légaré, F., Montori, V. M., et al. (2012). Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ, 344, e256. CrossRef
- Option grids. Available from: http://www.optiongrid.co.uk/. Accessed 28 Aug 2012.
- Joosten, E. A., Defuentes-Merillas, L., de Weert, G. H., Sensky, T., van der Staak, C. P., & de Jong, C. A. (2008). Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 77, 219–226.
- Mulley, A. G. Learning from variations to increase value for money in the NHS. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/blog/health_variations.html. 5 Aug 2011.
- Coulter, A. (1997). Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2(2), 112–121.
- Thomson, R., Murtagh, M., & Khaw, F. M. (2005). Tensions in public health policy: patient engagement, evidence-based public health and health inequalities. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 14(6), 398–400. CrossRef
- Henry, M. S. (2006). Uncertainty, responsibility, and the evolution of the physician/patient relationship. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 321–323. CrossRef
- Say, R. E., & Thomson, R. (2003). The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions—challenges for doctors. BMJ, 327, 542. CrossRef
- Radina, M. E., Ginter, A. C., Brandt, J., Swaney, J., & Longo, D. R. (2011). Breast cancer patients’ use of health information in decision making and coping. Cancer Nursing, 34(5), E1–E12. CrossRef
- Adams, J. R., & Drake, R. E. (2006). Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice. Community Mental Health Journal, 42(1), 87–105. CrossRef
- Incorporating the patient perspective: a critical review of clinical practice guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Volume 36, Issue 2 , pp 185-197
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Shared decision making
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators
- Clinical practice guidelines
- Patient perspective
- Psychosocial outcomes
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
- 2. Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK
- 3. Academic Office 1, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E 17th Ave, Campus Box B-180, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA