New directions in clinical outcomes assessment
- Sana M. Al-Khatib
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In recent years, electrophysiology clinical research has made tremendous progress. Not only have the standards for conducting research and assessing clinical outcomes improved substantially, but the power of well-conducted and designed randomized clinical trials has been realized. This has led to the emergence of a plethora of randomized clinical trials in electrophysiology. Despite these improvements, there is an immense need to explore and develop better approaches for assessing clinical outcomes. In this article, I review the strengths, challenges, and limitations of randomized clinical trials, especially as they relate to the field of electrophysiology. To address some of these challenges, I propose potential solutions that involve enhancing clinical trials and complementing them with large registries and databases of electronic medical records. If prudently developed and executed, these new directions in assessing clinical outcomes have great potential to inform, and thereby improve the care of patients receiving electrophysiologic interventions.
- Luce, B. R., Kramer, J. M., Goodman, S. N., Connor, J. T., Tunis, S., Whicher, D., et al. (2009). Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 206–209.
- Kent, D. M., & Hayward, R. A. (2007). Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification. JAMA, 298, 1209–1212. CrossRef
- Hannan, E. L. (2008). Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations. Journal of the American College of Cardiology Intervention, 1, 211–217.
- http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/inits/hfclinres-faq.htm. Accessed 18 Jul 2011
- Wilber, D. J., Pappone, C., Neuzil, P., et al. (2010). Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. JAMA, 303(4), 333–340. CrossRef
- Wyse, D. G., Walso, A. L., DiMarco, J. P., et al. (2002). A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 347, 1825–33. CrossRef
- Berry, D. A. (2006). Bayesian clinical trials. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 5, 27–36. CrossRef
- Spiegelhalter, D. J., Freedman, L. S., & Parmar, M. K. B. (1994). Bayesian approaches to randomized trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 157, 357–416. CrossRef
- Kadane, J. B. (1995). Prime time for Bayes. Controlled Clinical Trials, 16, 313–318. CrossRef
- Hammill, S. C., Kremers, M. S., Kadish, A. H., et al. (2009). Review of the ICD Registry's third year, expansion to include lead data and pediatric ICD procedures, and role for measuring performance. Heart Rhythm, 6, 1397–401. CrossRef
- Heart Rhythm Society: The ICD Registry Program. www.hrsonline.org/Policy/ICDRegistry/icd_registry.cfm. Accessed 15 Aug 2010.
- National Cardiovascular Data Registry: ICD Registry. www.ncdr.com/webncdr/ICD/Default.aspx. Accessed 15 Aug 2010.
- Curtis, J. P., Luebbert, J. J., Wang, Y., et al. (2009). Association of physician certification and outcomes among patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. JAMA, 301(16), 1661–1670. CrossRef
- Peterson, P. N., Daugherty, S. L., Wang, Y., Vidaillet, H. J., Heidenreich, P. A., Curtis, J. P., et al. (2009). Gender differences in procedure-related adverse events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Circulation, 119, 1078–1084. CrossRef
- Farmer, S. A., Kirkpatrick, J. N., Heidenreich, P. A., Curtis, J. P., Wang, Y., & Groeneveld, P. W. (2009). Ethnic and racial disparities in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm, 6, 325–331. CrossRef
- Aggarwal, A., Wang, Y., Rumsfeld, J. S., Curtis, J. P., & Heidenreich, P. A. (2009). Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcome of patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis referred for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Heart Rhythm, 6, 1565–1571. CrossRef
- National Cardiovascular Data Registry: the Pinnacle Registry. https://www.pinnacleregistry.org/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 25 Sept 2010.
- Al-Khatib, S. M., Calkins, H., Eloff, B. C., et al. (2010). Planning the Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Registry Initiative (SAFARI) as a collaborative pan-stakeholder critical path registry model: a Cardiac Safety Research Consortium ‘Incubator’ Think Tank. American Heart Journal, 159, 17–24. CrossRef
- Al-Khatib, S. M., Calkins, H., Eloff, B. C., Kowey, P., Hammill, S. C., Ellenbogen, K. A., et al. (2010). Developing the Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Registry Initiative (SAFARI) as a collaborative pan-stakeholder critical path registry model: a Cardiac Safety Research Consortium ‘Incubator’ Think Tank. American Heart Journal, 160, 619–626. CrossRef
- Blumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. (2010). The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 501–504. CrossRef
- Lau, F., Kuziemsky, C., Price, M., & Gardner, J. (2010). A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17, 637–45. CrossRef
- Jamal, A., McKenzie, K., & Clark, M. (2009). The impact of health information technology on the quality of medical and health care: a systematic review. Health Information Management Journal, 38, 26–37.
- Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010). Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 231. CrossRef
- New directions in clinical outcomes assessment
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Volume 32, Issue 3 , pp 221-226
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Randomized clinical trial
- Electrophysiology clinical research
- Clinical outcomes
- Selection bias
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, P.O. Box 17969, Durham, NC, 27715, USA