Skip to main content
Log in

On the Test and Mitigation of Malfunctions in Low-Power SRAMs

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In low-power SRAMs, power gating mechanisms are commonly used to reduce static power consumption. When the SRAM is not accessed for a long period, such mechanisms allow shutting off one or more memory blocks (core-cell array, address decoder, I/O logic, etc.), thus reducing leakage currents. In order to guarantee static power reduction in low-power SRAMs, reliable operation of power gating mechanisms must be ensured by adequate test techniques. In this paper, we first present a detailed analysis based on electrical simulations to identify faulty behaviors caused by realistic defects that may affect power gating mechanisms embedded in low-power SRAMs. Based on this analysis, we present an efficient test solution targeting detection of observed faulty behaviors. As a final contribution, we propose novel techniques to mitigate the impact of studied defects, once detected by test methods, therefore providing significant yield improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal A, Mukhopadhyay S, Kim CH, Raychowdhury A, Roy K (2005) Leakage power analysis and reduction: models, estimation and tools. IEE Computers and Digital Techniques 152(3):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosio A, Dilillo L, Girard P, Virazel A, Pravossoudovitch S (2009) Resistive-open defects in core-cells. Advanced test methods for SRAMs effective solutions for dynamic fault detection in nanoscale technologies, Springer, ISBN: 978-1-4419-0937-4

  3. Choi H, Kim K (2007) Cascade wake-up circuit preventing power noise in memory device. U.S. Patent 7 193 921 B2

  4. Cory BD, Kapur R, Underwood B (2003) Speed binning with path delay test in 150-nm technology. IEEE Design & Test of Computers 20(5):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Datta A, Bhunia S, Jung HC, Mukhopadhyay S (2008) Profit aware circuit design under process variations considering speed binning. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems 16(7):806–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dray C, Badereddine N, Chanussot C (2010) A 40 nm low power SRAM retention circuit with PVT-aware self-refreshing virtual VDD regulation. Proc. of Memory Workshop (IMW), 1–4

  7. Goel SK, Meijer M, de Gyvs JP (2006) Testing and diagnosis of power switches in SOCs. Proc of European Test Symposium 2006:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamdioui S, Al-Ars Z, van de Goor AJ, Rodgers M (2003) Dynamic faults in random-access-memories: concept, fault models and tests. Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications 19(2):195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamdioui S, Wadsworth R, Reyes JD, Van De Goor AJ (2004) “Memory fault modeling trends: a case study”. J Electron Test 20(3):245–255

  10. Hamdioui S et al (2010) March SS: A test for all static simple RAM faults. Proc of IEEE MTDT 2002:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  11. Irobi S, Al-Ars Z, Hamdioui S (2010) Detecting Memory Faults in the Presence of Bit Line Coupling in SRAM devices. Proc. of IEEE Internationl Test Conference, pp 1-10

  12. Itoh K (2002) Low voltage memories for power-aware systems. Proc. of ISLPED, 1–6.

  13. Kawahara T, Itoh K (2006) Leakage in Nanometer CMOS Technologies. In: Narendra SG, Chandrakasan A (eds) Memory leakage reduction - SRAM and DRAM specific leakage reduction techniques. Springer, New York, pp 163–199

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khursheed S, Sheng Y, Al-Hashimi BM, Xiaoyu H (2011) Improved DFT for Testing Power Switches. Proc. of European Test Symposium, pp 7-12

  15. Lee CF, Lin W, Lai FS, Lin SC (2007) On-chip VDC circuit for SRAM power management. Proc. of International Symposium on VLSI Design, Automation and Test, pp 1–4

  16. Roy K, Mukhopadhyay S, Mahmoodi-Meimand H (2003) Leakage current mechanism and leakage reduction techniques in deep-submicrometer CMOS circuits. Proc of IEEE 91(2):305–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) (2011) International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS)

  18. Tseng T-M, Chao MC-T, Lu C-P, Lo C-H (2009) Power-switch routing for coarse-grain MTCMOS technologies. International Conference on, Computer Aided Design, pp 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  19. van de Goor AJ (1991) Testing semiconductor memories: theory and practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  20. van de Goor AJ (1993) Using march tests to test SRAMs. IEEE Design & Test of Computers 10(1):8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang J, Calhoun BH (2008) Techniques to extend canary-based standby VDD scaling for SRAMs to 45 nm and beyond. IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits 43(11):2514–2523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang J, et al (2007) Statistical modeling for the minimum standby supply voltage of a full SRAM Array. Proc. of 33rd European Solid State Circuits Conference, pp 400–403

  23. Wang Y, Bhattacharya U, Hamzaoglu F, Kolar P, Yong-Gee N, Liqiong W, Ying Z, Zhang K, Bohr M (2010) A 4.0 GHz 291 Mb voltage-scalable SRAM design in a 32 nm high-k+ metal-gate CMOS technology with integrated power management. IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits 45(1):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamauchi H (2007) Embedded SRAM circuit design technology for 45 nm and beyond. Proc. of ASIC, pp 1028–1033

  25. Zordan LB, Bosio A, Dilillo L, Girard P, Todri A, Virazel A, Badereddine N (2013) A built-in scheme for testing and repairing voltage regulators of low-power SRAMs. Proc. of IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, pp 1–6

  26. Zordan LB, Bosio A, Dilillo L, Girard P, Todri A, Virazel A, Badereddine N (2012) Low-power srams power mode control logic: failure analysis and test solutions. Proc. of IEEE Int. Test Conference, paper 14.3

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bosio.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: S. Hamdioui

This paper is an extended version of a previously published paper [26]. Main contributions of this paper with respect to [26] are:

• A more detailed analysis of experimental results that characterize the impacts of studied resistive-open defects.

• A comprehensive analysis of experimental results showing that the impacts of the most critical defect (Df6) can be mitigated at the expense of increased wake up time or clock cycle.

• A more detailed analysis of conditions to coverage faulty behaviors caused by Df6.

• A detailed and comprehensive analysis on techniques to estimate the adjusted wake up time and clock cycle that must be used to in order to mitigate the impact of Df6 on SRAM devices that are in presence of such defect.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonet Zordan, L.H., Bosio, A., Dilillo, L. et al. On the Test and Mitigation of Malfunctions in Low-Power SRAMs. J Electron Test 30, 611–627 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-014-5479-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-014-5479-z

Keywords

Navigation