Exploring the Design of Financial Counseling for Mortgage Borrowers in Default
- J. Michael Collins
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper analyzes the effects of counseling provided to borrowers in mortgage default (n = 299). Borrowers receiving more hours of counseling perceive counseling more favorably than those receiving fewer hours of counseling. Using measures of marketing efforts to instrument counseling time confirms the positive effect of counseling duration on borrower ratings of counseling. Borrowers are more likely to attend additional counseling sessions after receiving face-to-face counseling as opposed to telephone counseling, although preference among modes can largely be explained by time in counseling. Each additional hour of counseling reduces the marginal probability of a borrower moving to a more severe stage of foreclosure. Counseling could be more successful if provided for longer durations regardless of the delivery mode.
- Apgar, W.C., & Duda, M. (2004) Preserving homeownership: Community development implications of the new mortgage market. Retrieved January 14, 2007, from http://www.nw.org
- Apgar, W.C., & Duda, M. (2005). Collateral damage: The municipal impact of today’s mortgage foreclosure boom. Minneapolis, MN: Homeownership Preservation Foundation. Retrieved January 14, 2007, from http://www.hpfonline.org
- Collins, J. M., Belsky, E. S., & Case, C. E. (2005). Exploring the welfare effects of risk-based pricing in the subprime mortgage market. In N. Retsinas, & E. Belsky (Eds.), Building assets, building credit: Creating wealth in low-income communities (pp. 132–151). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
- Cordell, L. (2001). Innovative servicing technology: Smart enough to sustain homeownership gains? Panel presentation at the Research Institute for Housing America: 2001 Conference on Housing Opportunity: Will Technology Expand Housing Opportunity? Washington, DC.
- Cutts, A. C., & Green, R. K. (2005). Innovative servicing technology: Smart enough to keep people in their houses? In N. Retsinas, & E. Belsky (Eds.), Building assets, building credit: Creating wealth in low-income communities (pp. 348–377). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
- Gramlich, E. M. (2004). Subprime mortgage lending: Benefits, costs, and challenges. Remarks at the Financial Services Roundtable Annual Housing Policy Meeting. Chicago, IL.
- Hairston, J. (2006) Home foreclosures soar; Lender-friendly Georgia has highest rate in nation, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, p. 1G.
- Hartarska, V., & Gonzalez-Vega, C. (2005). Credit counseling and mortgage termination by low-income households. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 30(3), 227–243. CrossRef
- Hirad, A., & Zorn, P. M. (2002). Pre-purchase homeownership counseling: A little knowledge is a good thing. In N. Retsinas, & E. Belsky (Eds.), Low-income homeownership: Examining the unexamined goal (pp. 146–174). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
- Immergluck, D., & Smith, G. (2006). The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on neighborhood crime. Housing Studies, 21(6), 851–866. CrossRef
- Moreno, A. (1994). Assessment of post-purchase needs of low- and moderate-income homebuyers. (White Paper). Minneapolis, MN: Family Housing Fund.
- Mortgage Bankers Association. (2005). National Delinquency Survey. Retrieved January 14, 2007, from http://www.mbaa.org
- Perry, V. G., & Morris M. D. (2005). Who is in control? The role of self-perception, knowledge, and income in explaining consumer financial behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 299–314. CrossRef
- Quercia, R., Cowan, S, & Moreno, A. (2004). The Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based Foreclosure Prevention. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University Retrieved January 14, 2007, from www.jchs.harvard.edu
- Quercia, R. G., McCarthy, G. W., & Stegman, M. A. (1995). Mortgage default among rural, low-income borrowers. Journal of Housing Research, 6(2), 349–369.
- Quercia, R. G., & Wachter, S. M. (1996) Homeownership counseling performance: How can it be measured? Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 175–187.
- RealtyTrac. (2006). Irvine, CA. January 23, 2006 Retrieved January 23, 2006, from http://www.realtytrac.com
- Roper Public Affairs and Media. (2005) Freddie Mac, Roper survey asks why more delinquent borrowers don’t call lenders for help. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.freddiemac.com
- Salant, P., & Dillman, D. A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley.
- Staten, M. E., Elliehausen, E. C., & Lundquist, G. (2003). The impact of credit counseling on subsequent borrower credit usage and payment behavior. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
- Strauss, L., & Phillips, S. (1997). Housing counseling in rural America. Washington, DC: Housing Assistance Council. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.ruralhome.org
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2005a) Housing Counseling Assistance: 2005 Summary Statement and Initiative. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from www.hud.gov
- U.S. Department of Housing, Urban Development. (2005b) U.S. Housing Market Conditions. Washington, DC: HUDUSER.
- Vandell, K. D. (1995). How ruthless is mortgage default? A review and synthesis of the evidence. Journal of Housing Research, 6(2), 245–264.
- Exploring the Design of Financial Counseling for Mortgage Borrowers in Default
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
Volume 28, Issue 2 , pp 207-226
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Credit counseling
- Mortgage default counseling
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Cornell University, 711 North Aurora Street, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA