Date: 18 Nov 2012
Architects, captains, and dreamers: Creating advisor roles that foster youth-adult partnerships
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
While research has documented the many ways in which student voice can enable educational change, the process of how adults can help to enable student voice is less clear. This article examines how adults new to working as advisors of student voice initiatives begin to develop partnerships with young people. Using a Youth-Adult Partnership continuum as a framework, three cases represent a range of beliefs of student leadership. Using the archetypes of Captain, Dreamer, and Architect, the cases indicate how the adults began their work with youth with adult-centered, a student-centered, and an equilibrium approach, respectively. While the article highlights that adults must learn how to scaffold youth participation to help them to develop the leadership skills necessary to share in the work of the partnership, little training and materials exist for adults to learn how to scaffold learning. Part of this training includes the willingness for adults to recognize that they themselves need to change as well in order to facilitate youth leadership.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373.CrossRef
Bragg, S. (2007). “It’s not about systems, it’s about relationships”: Building a listening culture in a primary school. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 659–680). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Camino, L. (2000). Putting youth-adult partnerships to work for community change: Lessons from volunteers across the country. Community Youth Development Journal, 1(4), 213–220.
Camino, L. (2005). Pitfalls and promising practices of youth-adult partnerships: An evaluator’s reflections. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 75–85.CrossRef
Camino, L., & Zeldin, S. (2002). From periphery to center: Pathways for youth civic engagement in the day-to-day life of communities. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 213–220.CrossRef
Colatos, A. M., & Morrell, E. (2003). Apprenticing urban youth as critical researchers: Implications for increasing equity and access in diverse urban schools. In B. Rubin & E. Silva (Eds.), Critical voices in school reform: Students living through change. London: Routledge Farmer.
Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Change based on what students say’: Preparing teachers for a paradoxical model of leadership. International Journal of Leadership Education, 9(4), 345–358.CrossRef
Cuban, L. (2003). Why is it so hard to get good schools?. New York: Teachers College Press.
Denner, J., Meyer, B., & Bean, S. (2005). Young women’s leadership alliance: Youth–adult partnerships in an all-female after-school program. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 87–100.CrossRef
Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Committee on community-level programs for youth. Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences Education, National Research.
Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 123–141.CrossRef
Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311.CrossRef
Fiscus, L. (2003). Youth as equal partners in decision-making. The Education Digest, 68, 58–63.
Flanagan, C. A. (2003). Developmental roots of political engagement. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 257–261.CrossRef
Ginwright, S. A. (2005). On urban ground: Understanding African-American intergenerational partnerships in urban communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 101–110.CrossRef
Goodlad, J. (2004). A place called school (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
Greeno, J. G., & Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.CrossRef
Jones, K., & Perkins, D. (2004). Youth-adult partnerships. In C. B. Fisher & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Applied developmental science: An encyclopedia of research, policies, and programs (pp. 1159–1163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, K. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2006). Youth and adult perceptions of their relationships within community-based youth programs. Youth and Society, 38(1), 90–109.CrossRef
Kirshner, B. (2008). Guided participation in three youth activism organizations: Facilitation, apprenticeship, and joint work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 60–101.CrossRef
Kirshner, B., O’Donoghue, J. L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (Eds.). (2003). New directions for youth development: Youth participation improving institutions and communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 57–74.CrossRef
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Leonard, P. E., & Leonard, L. J. (2001). The collaborative prescription: Remedy or reverie? International Journal of Leadership Education, 4(4), 383–399.CrossRef
Levin, B. L. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. International Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155–172.
McIntyre, D., & Rudduck, J. (2007). Improving learning through consulting pupils. London: Taylor & Francis.
McLaughlin, M. W., Irby, M., & Langman, J. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the livesand futures of inner city youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McQuillan, P. J. (2005). Possibilities and pitfalls: A comparative analysis of student empowerment. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 639–672.CrossRef
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development. Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.CrossRef
Mitra, D. L. (2005). Adults advising youth: Leading while getting out of the way. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 520–553.CrossRef
Mitra, D. L. (2008). Student voice in school reform: Building youth-adult partnerships that strengthen schools and empower youth. Albany: NY, State University of New York Press.
Mitra, D. L. (2009a). The role of intermediary organizations in sustaining student voice initiatives. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1834–1868.
Mitra, D. L. (2009b). Strengthening student voice initiatives in high schools: An examination of the supports needed for school-based youth-adult partnerships. Youth and Society, 40(3), 311–335.CrossRef
Mitra, D. L., & Kirshner, B. (2012). Insiders versus outsiders—Examining variability in student voice initiatives and their consequences for school change. In B. McMahon & J. Portelli (Eds.), Student engagement in urban schools: Beyond neoliberal discourses (pp. 49–72). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Mitra, D., Sanders, F., & Perkins, D. (2010). Providing spark and stability: The role of intermediary organizations in establishing school-based youth-adult partnerships. Applied Developmental Science, 12(14), 1–18.
Mueller, R. B., Wunrow, J. J., & Einspruch, E. L. (2000). Providing youth services through youth-adult partnerships: A review of the literature. Reaching Today’s Youth, 4, 37–48.
Perkins, D. F., Scheve, J., Mincemoyer, C., & Welsh, J. (2005). Say YES to youth engagement strategies. University Park, PA: Penn State Cooperative Extension.
Powell, K. (2008). Drumming against the quiet: The sound of Asian American identity politics in an amorphous landscape. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(6), 901–925. (Special issue on critical race theory, auto ethnography, and performance studies).
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement, and school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587–610). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and perspective: “Carving a new order of experience.” Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89 (ST—Pupil participation and perspective).
Sanders, F., Movit, M., Mitra, D., & Perkins, D. F. (2007). Examining ways in which youth conferences can spell out gains in positive youth development. LEARNing Landscapes, 1(1), 49–78.
Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (1998). Supervision: A redefinition (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Sizer, T. R. (1997). Horace’s school: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Syvertsen, A. K., Wray-Lake, L., Flanagan, C. A., Osgood, D. W., & Briddell, L. (2011). Thirty year trends in US adolescents’ civic engagement: A story of changing participation and educational differences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 586–594.
Walker, K. C., & Larson, R. W. (2006). Dilemmas of youth work: Balancing the professional and personal. New Directions for Youth Development, 112, 109–118. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yd.196.
Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Designs and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Young, K. S., & Sazama, J. (1999). 14 points: Successfully involving youth in decision making. Somerville, MA: Youth on Board.
Youniss, J., & Hart, D. (2005). Intersection of social institutions with civic development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 109, 73–81 (ST—Intersection of social institutions wi).
Zeldin, S. (2004). Youth as agents of adult and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance. Applied Developmental Science, 8, 75–90.CrossRef
Zeldin, S., Camino, L., Calvert, M., & Ivey, D. (2002). Youth-adult partnerships and positive youth development: Some lessons learned from research and practice in Wisconsin. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Extension.
- Architects, captains, and dreamers: Creating advisor roles that foster youth-adult partnerships
Journal of Educational Change
Volume 14, Issue 2 , pp 177-201
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Student voice
- Youth-adult partnerships
- Civic engagement