February 2009, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 1-12,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 13 Mar 2008
Contest, contradiction, and security: The moral possibilities of liminal education
The article develops a conception of education that we have named liminal education. Liminal education tries to counter the centripetal tendencies of the centre (particular that of the consumer market) by disclosing alternative positions in order to enable children to cultivate a critically reflective disposition. A second feature of liminal education is that it carries the potential to assist children in recognising that otherness is not the same thing as being alien. Finally, it is characterised by an embodiment of the notion of ‘communitas’, a state in which no one can have authority over another or see themselves as superior. For children who live within the dominant (centre) culture and who find security in consumerism, liminal education is important because it offers them imaginative possibilities which could give rise to alternative conceptions of the good life. Children in liminal communities will benefit from liminal education, because they will have a better understanding of their own position and those of others, which, we believe, will reduce the anxiety of loosing one’s identity and thereby the need to return to anxiously held foundational beliefs.
Ameli, S. R., Azam, A., & Merali, A. (2005). Secular or Islamic? What schools do British Muslims want for their children? (Vol. 3 of the British Muslims’ Expectations Series). London: Islamic Human Rights Commission.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Arendt, H. (1968). Between past and future. London: Penguin.
Bottery, M. (2000). Education, policy and ethics. London: Continuum.
Brighouse, H. (2006). On education. London: Routledge.
Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (trans: Kaufmann, W., Ed.). Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Carr, D., & Davis, R. A. (2007). The lure of evil: Exploring moral formation on the dark side of literature and the arts. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(1), 95–112.CrossRef
Conroy, J. C. (2004). Betwixt and between: The liminal imagination, education and democracy. New York: Peter Laing.
De Ruyter, D. J. (2001). Fundamentalist education: A critical analysis. Religious Education, 96(2), 193–210.CrossRef
DfES. (2001). Education and skills: Delivering results: A strategy to 2006. Available at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/deliveringresults/docs/DfES_strategy_Document.doc. Accessed 12 Dec 2005.
DfES. (2004). Autumn performance report 2004. Available at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/deptreport2004/autumn_performance_report. Accessed 12 Dec 2005.
DfES. (2005). 14–19 Education and skills—White paper. Available at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/publications/14-19educationandskills. Accessed 12 Dec 2005.
Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
Giroux, H. (1996). Slacking off: Border youth and postmodern education. In H. Giroux, C. Lankshear, P. McLaren, & M. Peters (Eds.), Counter narratives: Cultural studies and critical pedagogies in postmodern spaces (pp. 59–80). London: Routledge.
Giroux, H. (2004). Beyond belief: Religious fundamentalism and cultural politics in the age of George W. Bush. Cultural Studies <=> Critical methodologies, 4(4), 415–425.CrossRef
Heaney, S. (1995). The redress of poetry: Oxford lectures. London: Faber.
Heaney, S. (1996). The spirit level. London: Faber.
Lingard, B. (2000). It is and it isn’t: Vernacular globalisation, educational policy and RE-structuring. In N. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 79–108). New York: Routledge.
Marsden, G. M. (2006). Fundamentalism and American culture (new edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marty, M. E., & Appleby, R. S. (1991). Conclusion: An interim report on a hypothetical family. In M. E. Marty & R. S. Appleby (Eds.), Fundamentalisms observed. The fundamentalist project vol. 1 (pp. 814–842). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mason, J. (2001). International rescue required. Labour tribune. London.
McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture. New York: Routledge.
Noddings, N. (1993). Educating for intelligent belief or unbelief. New York: Teachers College Press.
Paulin, T. (1999). The wind dog. London: Faber and Faber.
Peters, R. S. (Ed.). (1973). The philosophy of education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pountain, D., & Robins, D. (2000). Cool rules: Anatomy of an attitude. London: Reaktion Books.
Raz, J. (2003). The practice of value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ritzer, G. (2000). The McDonaldization of society: New century edition. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Scottish Executive and Learning and Teaching Scotland. (2001). The balance and structure of the curriculum: 5–14 National guidelines. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.
Scottish Executive Education Department. (2004). The review of the curriculum 3–18. Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Education/School-Education/18088/CurriculumReview. Accessed 12 Dec 2005.
Turner, V. (1969, 1995). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
- Contest, contradiction, and security: The moral possibilities of liminal education
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of Educational Change
Volume 10, Issue 1 , pp 1-12
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Border pedagogy
- Liberal education
- Liminal education
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Faculty of Education, University of Glasgow, St. Andrew’s Building, 11 Eldon Street, Glasgow, G3 6NH, Scotland, UK
- 2. Department of Theory and Research in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands