Abramson, Arthur, and Leigh Lisker. 1985. Relative power of cues: F0 shift versus voice timing. In Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged, eds. V. Fromkin, 25–33. Orlando: Academic Press.
Anderson Stephen. (1981) Why phonology isn’t ‘natural’. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 493–539Google Scholar
Anttila Arto, Young-mee Yu Cho. (1998) Variation and change in Optimality Theory. Lingua 104: 31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon, and Robert Harms. (1972). How do languages get crazy rules? In Linguistic change and generative theory, ed. R. Stockwell and R. Macaulay, 1–21. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Bennett Patrick. (1967) Dahl’s law and Thagicu. African Language Studies 8: 127–159Google Scholar
Blevins Juliette. (2004) Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Boersma Paul. (1998) Functional phonology. Holland Academic Graphics, The HagueGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, Andries, and Joe Pater. (2005). Lexically gradient phonotactics in Muna and Optimality Theory. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Evans, Nick. 1995. Current issues in the phonology of Australian languages. In Handbook of phonological theory, ed. J.A. Goldsmith, 723–761. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fleischhacker, Heidi. 2005. Similarity in phonology: Evidence from reduplication and loan adaptation. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Flemming, Edward. 1995. Auditory representations in phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Flickinger Daniel. (1981) Dissimilation in Gothic without Thurneysen’s Law. Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society 17: 67–75Google Scholar
Frisch, Stephan. (2004). Language processing and segmental OCP effects. In Phonetically-based phonology, ed. B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, and D. Steriade, 346–371. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garrett, Andrew. (2007). Thurneysen’s Law. A handout from East Coast Indo-European Conference 26, Yale University.
Hawkins Sarah, Noel Nguyen. (2004) Influence of syllable-coda voicing on the acoustic properties of syllable-onset /l/ in English. Journal of Phonetics 32: 199–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. (1999). Phonetically-driven phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, ed. M. Darnell, E. Moravscik, M. Noonan, F. Newmeyer, and K. Wheatly, 243–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hooper Joan. (1976) An introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Hopper Paul. (1973) Glottalized and murmured occlusives in Indo-European. Glossa 7: 141–166Google Scholar
Huffman, Marie. (1993). Phonetic patterns of nasalization and implications for feature specification. In Phonetics and phonology 5: Nasals, nasalization and the velum, ed. M. Huffman and R. Krakow, 303–327. San Diego: Academic Press.
Armin Mester., Armin Mester. (1986) The phonology of voicing in Japanese: Theoretical consequences for morphological accessibility. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 49–73Google Scholar
Katayama, Motoko (1998) Optimality Theory and Japanese loanword phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, UCSC.
Kawahara Shigeto. (2005) Voicing and geminacy in Japanese: An acoustic and erceptual study. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 31: 87–120Google Scholar
Kawahara Shigeto. (2006) A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: The case of voicing in Japanese. Language 82: 536–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara Shigeto. (2007) Half-rhymes in Japanese rap lyrics and knowledge of similarity. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16: 113–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto, and Kazuko Shinohara. (2009). The role of psychoacoustic similarity in Japanese imperfect puns: A corpus study. Journal of Linguistics 45.
Keating Patricia, Aditi Lahiri. (1993) Fronted velars, palatalized velars, and palatals. Phonetica 50: 73–101Google Scholar
Kiparsky Paul. (1985) Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2: 85–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leben, William. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. Ph.D.dissertation, MIT.
Liljencrants Johan, Björn Lindblom. (1972) Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 48: 839–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker Leigh. (1978) On buzzing the English /b/. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR- 55(56): 251–259Google Scholar
Lyman, Benjamin S. 1894. Change from surd to sonant in Japanese compounds. Oriental Studies of the Oriental Club of Philadelphia: 1–17.
Macmillan Neil, Douglas Creelman. (2005) Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian (1997) Phonetic universals. In The handbook of phonetics sciences, ed. W. Hardcastle and J. Laver, 619–639. Oxford: Blackwell.
Meillet, Antoine. (1964). Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-européennes [Reprint of 8th Edition]. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Nishimura, Kohei. (2003). Lyman’s law in loanwords. Ms., University of Tokyo.
Ohala, John. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the parasession on language and behavior: 178–203.
Ohala, John. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In The production of speech, ed. P. MacNeilage, 189–216. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ohala, John. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, ed. C. Jones, 237–278. London: Longman Academic.
Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.
Raphael Lawrence. (1981) Duration and contexts as cues to word-final cognate opposition in English. Phonetica 38: 126–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, Joao. (1930). Nihon Dai Bunten [Arte da Lingoa de Japam]. Tokyo: Sanseidoo [Originally written in 1604–1608; translated by Tadao Doi in 1930].
Sapir, Edward. (1912). The Takelma language of southwestern Oregon. In The handbook of American Indian languages, ed. F. Boas, 1–296. Washington: Bureau of American Ethnography.
Stampe, David. (1973). A dissertation on natural phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Steriade, Donca. (2001). The phonology of perceptibility effect: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. Ms., UCLA.
Tesar, Bruce. (2007). A comparison of lexicographic and linear numeric optimization using violation difference ratio. Ms., Rutgers University.
Thurneysen Rudolf. (1897) Spirantenwechsel im gotischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 8: 208–214Google Scholar
Unger, Marshall. (1975). Studies in Early Japanese morphophonemics. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.
van Summers W. (1988) F1 structure provides information for final-consonant voicing. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 84: 485–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Timothy. 2005. Sequential voicing and Lyman’s Law in Old Japanese. In Polymorphous linguistics: Jim McCawley’s legacy, ed. S. Mufwene, E. Francis, and R. Wheeler, 27–43. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Verner, Kerl. 1875/1967. An exception to the first sound shift. Reprinted in A reader in nineteenth century historical Indo-European linguistics, ed. R.P. Lehmann 1967, 132–163. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Whalen Douglas, Arthur Abramson, Leigh Lisker, Maria Mody. (1990) Gradient effects of fundamental frequency on stop consonant voicing judgments. Phonetica 47: 36–49Google Scholar
Whalen Douglas, Patrice Beddor. (1989) Connections between nasality and vowel duration and height: Elucidation of the Eastern Algonquian intrusive nasal. Language 65: 457–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuraw Kie. (2007) The role of phonetic knowledge in phonological patterning: Corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog reduplication. Language 83: 277–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar