Left periphery and how-why alternations
- Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This article concerns the “topography” of the Left Periphery, in particular, the syntactic distribution of how-questions across languages and their corresponding semantic interpretations. Causal wh and reason wh are analyzed as sentential operators in the left periphery, which scope over the entire IP and take the corresponding event/state as their complements. By contrast, manner and instrumental wh’s are both analyzed as vP-modifiers, which translate into restrictive predicates of the underlying event argument associated with the peripheral area of vP. These wh-expressions differ dramatically with respect to their behavior towards locality principles. On the one hand, only instrumental wh, but not manner wh, may escape from strong island effects and weak intervention effects. On the other, they both observe strong intervention effects, triggered by negation and A-not-A questions. It is suggested that this apparent paradox can be solved by a generalized version of Relativized Minimality proposed in Rizzi (Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford University Press, New York, 2004).
- Alexiadou Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou. (1998). Parametrizing AGR, word order, V-movement, and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539 CrossRef
- Baker C.L. (1970). Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6: 197–219
- Beck Sigrid, Shin-Sook Kim. (1997). On wh- and operator scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 339–384 CrossRef
- Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The structure of CP and IP, ed. L. Rizzi, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bromberger Sylvain. (1992). On what we know we don’t know. Chicago University Press and Center for Study of Language and Information, Chicago and Stanford
- Cheng, Lisa L.-S. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. MIT: PhD Dissertation.
- Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Johan Rooryck. 2002. Types of wh-in-situ. Ms. Leiden University.
- Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Cinque Guglielmo. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford University Press, Oxford
- Collins, Chris. 1991. Why and how come. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 31–45. Cambridge: MIT.
- Hagstrom, Paul. 1998. Decomposing questions. MIT: PhD Dissertation.
- Hamblin C.L. (1973). Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53
- Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. University of Massachussetts, Amherst: PhD Dissertation.
- Huang C.-T. James. (1982a). Move wh in a language without wh movement. The Linguistic Review 1: 369–416 CrossRef
- Huang, C.-T. James. 1982b. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. MIT: PhD Dissertation.
- Karttunen Lauri. (1977). The syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44 CrossRef
- Ko Heejeong. (2005). Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23(4): 867–916 CrossRef
- Ko, Heejeong. 2006. On the structural height of reason wh-adverbials: Acquisition and consequences, In Wh-movement moving on, ed. L. Cheng and N. Corver, 319–349. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Laenzlinger, Christopher. 1996. Comparative studies in word order variations: Adverbs, pronouns and clause structure in Romance and Germanic. Université de Genève: Thèse de doctorat.
- Li Y.-H. Audrey. (1992). Indefinite wh in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 125–155 CrossRef
- Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2001. The EPP, Scrambling, and wh-in-situ. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 293– 338. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1986. Quantification in syntax. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: PhD Dissertation.
- Obenauer, H. 1994. Aspects de la syntaxe A-barre. Université de Paris VIII: Thèse de doctorat d’é tat.
- Ochi Masao. (2004). How come and other adjunct wh-phrases: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language and Linguistics 5: 29–57
- Parsons Terence. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
- Parsons Terence. (1995). Thematic relations and arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 635–662
- Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh in situ: Movement and unselective binding. In Representation of (In)definiteness, ed. E. Reuland and A. Ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Ramchand, Gillian. 2003. First phase syntax. Ms. University of Oxford.
- Reinhart Tanya. (1998). Wh-in-situ in the framework of the minimalist program. Natural Language Semantics 6: 29–56 CrossRef
- Reinhart Tanya. (2003). The theta system—an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3): 229–290 CrossRef
- Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, ed. L. Haegeman, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Rizzi, Luigi. 1999. On the position “int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. Ms. Universita‘ di Siena.
- Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and the left periphery. In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, ed. Adriana Belletti, 223–251. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Shen, Yeshayahu. 1985. The structure of action in the short narrative text. Tel Aviv University: PhD Dissertation.
- Simpson, Andrew. 1995. Wh-movement, licensing and the locality of feature checking. SOAS: PhD Dissertation.
- Simpson Andrew. (2000). Wh-movement and the theory of feature-checking. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
- Stepanov, Arthur, and W.-T. Dylan Tsai. To appear. Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: A cross-linguistic perspective. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
- Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 1994. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. MIT: PhD Dissertation.
- Tsai W.-T. Dylan. (1999a). On lexical courtesy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 39–73 CrossRef
- Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 1999b. The hows of why and the whys of how. UCI Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 5, ed. Francesca Del Gobbo and Hidehito Hoshi, 155–184. UC Irrine.
- Tsai W.-T. Dylan, Melody Y. Chang. (2003). Two types of wh-adverbials: A typological study of how and why in Tsou. The Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3: 213– 236 CrossRef
- Watanabe Akira. (1992). Subjacency and s-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 255–292 CrossRef
- Left periphery and how-why alternations
Journal of East Asian Linguistics
Volume 17, Issue 2 , pp 83-115
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Left periphery
- How-why alternations
- Syntax–semantics interface intervention effects
- Relativized minimality
- Cartographic approach
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2 Kuang Fu Road, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan