Skip to main content
Log in

Complex Predicates, Aspect, and Anti-reconstruction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper contrasts two families of approaches to certain affixal verb constructions in Japanese, with particular emphasis on the ’potential’ construction. Scope facts in this construction have been offered as support for complex predicate analyses, in which there is no syntactic constituent consisting of the object and lower verb, to the exclusion of the potential head -rare. We provide a variety of arguments, primarily from aspectual modification properties, which strongly challenge this family of approaches and favor instead VP-complementation approaches in which the potential head selects a thematically complete VP complement. Finally, we show how the scope facts may be accommodated on such a viewpoint, drawing connections to similar properties with other restructuring configurations cross-linguistically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bobaljik J.D., Wurmbrand S. (2005). The domain of agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 809–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty D. (1979). Word meaning and montague grammar. Dordrecht, Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  • Futagi, Y. (2004). Japanese focus particles at the syntax–semantics interface. Ph.D. Dissertation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.

  • Harada, Y., & Noguchi, N. (1992). On the semantics and pragmatics of dake (and only). In C. Barker, & D. Dowty Eds.), SALT II (pp. 125–144). (Working Papers in Linguistics 40), Columbus: Ohio State University.

  • Hoshi, H. (1999). Complex predicate formation in Japanese: A (Non-)configurational theory. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 427–473.

  • Kathol A. (2000). Linear syntax. New York/Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, S. (2003). Derivational theta-marking: A minimalist approach to the complex predicate constructions in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu [Journal of Linguistic Society of Japan] 124, 37–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi, M. (1995). Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

  • Manning C., Sag I., Iida M. (1999). The lexical integrity of Japanese causatives. In: Levine R.D., Green G.M. (eds) Studies in contemporary phrase structure grammar. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 39-79

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto Y. (1996). Complex predicates in Japanese: A syntactic and semantic study of the notion ’word’. Stanford, Calif, CSLI Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomura, M. (2003). The true nature of nominative objects in Japanese. In E. Kaiser, & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics Proceedings of the 26th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (pp. 169–183). Penn Linguistics Club.

  • Nomura, M. (2005). Nominative case and AGREE(ment). Ph.D. Dissertation, Storrs: University of Connecticut.

  • Rooth, M. (1985). Association with Focus. Ph.D. Dissertation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

  • Rothstein, S. D. (2004). Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Saito, M. (2000). Predicate raising and theta relations. In Proceeding of 2000 Seoul International Conference on Language and Computation (pp. 85–113). The Linguistic Society of Korea.

  • Saito, M., & Hoshi, H. (1998). Control in Complex Predicates. ms., Nanzan University and SOAS.

  • Sano M. (1985). LF movement in Japanese. Descriptive and Applied Linguistics, 18, 245–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Tada H. (1992). Nominative objects in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 14, 91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano, Y. (2003). Nominative objects in Japanese complex predicate constructions: A prolepsis analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 779–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmbrand S. (2001). Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmbrand S. (2004). Two types of restructuring-Lexical vs. functional. Lingua, 114, 991–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurmbrand, S. (2005). How complex are complex predicates? ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs; to appear in Syntax.

  • Yokota, K. (2001). Complex-predicate formation and some consequences in Japanese, Abstract for LFG 2001 conference: http://www.hku.hk/linguist/research/Ab_Yokota.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan D. Bobaljik.

Additional information

For discussion of the material presented here, and judgements on examples, we are grateful to Kimiko Nakanishi, Masashi Nomura, Mamoru Saito, Tomokazu Takehisa, Kazuko Yatsushiro, and the JEAL editors and reviewers, as well as the audiences at CLA 2003 (Halifax) and JK-14 (Tucson). Parts of this research were funded by a grant from the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bobaljik, J.D., Wurmbrand, S. Complex Predicates, Aspect, and Anti-reconstruction. J East Asian Linguist 16, 27–42 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-006-9004-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-006-9004-y

Keywords

Navigation