Spike timing dependent plasticity promotes synchrony of inhibitory networks in the presence of heterogeneity
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Recently Haas et al. (J Neurophysiol 96: 3305–3313, 2006), observed a novel form of spike timing dependent plasticity (iSTDP) in GABAergic synaptic couplings in layer II of the entorhinal cortex. Depending on the relative timings of the presynaptic input at time t pre and the postsynaptic excitation at time t post, the synapse is strengthened (Δt = t post − t pre > 0) or weakened (Δt < 0). The temporal dynamic range of the observed STDP rule was found to lie in the higher gamma frequency band (≥40 Hz), a frequency range important for several vital neuronal tasks. In this paper we study the function of this novel form of iSTDP in the synchronization of the inhibitory neuronal network. In particular we consider a network of two unidirectionally coupled interneurons (UCI) and two mutually coupled interneurons (MCI), in the presence of heterogeneity in the intrinsic firing rates of each coupled neuron. Using the method of spike time response curve (STRC), we show how iSTDP influences the dynamics of the coupled neurons, such that the pair synchronizes under moderately large heterogeneity in the firing rates. Using the general properties of the STRC for a Type-1 neuron model (Ermentrout, Neural Comput 8:979–1001, 1996) and the observed iSTDP we determine conditions on the initial configuration of the UCI network that would result in 1:1 in-phase synchrony between the two coupled neurons. We then demonstrate a similar enhancement of synchrony in the MCI with dynamic synaptic modulation. For the MCI we also consider heterogeneity introduced in the network through the synaptic parameters: the synaptic decay time of mutual inhibition and the self inhibition synaptic strength. We show that the MCI exhibits enhanced synchrony in the presence of all the above mentioned sources of heterogeneity and the mechanism for this enhanced synchrony is similar to the case of the UCI.
- Abarbanel, H., Gibb, L., Huerta, R., & Rabinovich, M. (2003). Biophysical model of synaptic plasticity dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 89, 214–226. CrossRef
- Abarbanel, H., & Talathi, S. (2006). Neural circuitry for recognizing interspike interval sequences. Physical Review Letters, 96, 148104. CrossRef
- Acker, C., Kopell, N., & White, J. (2004). Synchronization of strongly coupled excitatory neurons: Relating network behavior to biophysics. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 15, 71–90. CrossRef
- Benardo, L. (1997). Recruitment of GABAergic inhibition and synchronization of inhibitory interneurons in rat neocortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 3134–3144.
- Bragin, A., Jando, G., Nadasdy, Z., Hetke, J., Wise, K., et al. (1995). Gamma (40–100 Hz) oscillations in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 47–60.
- Eckhorn, R., Bauer, B., Jordan, W., Brosch, M., Kruse, W., et al. (1988). Coherent oscillations: A mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics, 60, 121–130. CrossRef
- Ermentrout, B. (1996). Type 1 membranes, phase resetting curves and synchrony. Neural Compute, 8, 979–1001. CrossRef
- Ernst, U., Pawelzik, K., & Geisel, T. (1995). Synchronization induced by temporal delays in pulse-coupled oscillators. Physical Review Letters, 74, 1570–1573. CrossRef
- Froemke, R., & Dan, Y. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. Nature, 416, 433–438. CrossRef
- Gray, C., Koenig P, Engel, K., & Singer, W. (1989). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit intercolumnar synchronization which reflect global stimulus properties. Nature, 338, 334–337. CrossRef
- Haas, J., Nowotny, T., & Abarbanel, H. (2006). Spike-timing-dependent plasticity of inhibitory synapses in the entorhinal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 3305–3313. CrossRef
- Jefferys, J., Traub, R., & Whittington, M. (1996). Neuronal networks for induced 40 Hz rhythms. Trends in Neuroscience, 19, 202–208.
- Kopell, N., & Ermentrout, B. (2004). Chemical and Electrical synapses perform complementary roles in the synchronization of interneuronal networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 15482–15487. CrossRef
- Kurths, J., Pikovsky, A., & Rosenblum, M. (2001). Synchronization, a universal concept in non-linear science. Cambridge University Press.
- Lacaille, J., & Williams, S. (1990). Membrane properties of interneurons in stratum oriens-alveus of the CA1 region of rat hippocampus in vitro. Neuroscience, 36, 349–359. CrossRef
- McCormick, D., Connors, B., Lighthall, J., & Prince, D. (1985). Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 54, 782–806
- Michelson, H., & Wong, R. (1994). Syncrhonization of inhibitory neurones in the guinea-pig hippocampus in vitro. Journal of Physiology, 477, 35–45.
- Nowotny, T., Zhigulin, V., Selverston, A., Abarbanel, H., & Rabinovich, M. (2003). Enhancement of synchronization in hybrid neural circuit by spike timing dependent plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9776–9785.
- Oprisan, S., Prinz, A., & Canavier, C. (2004). Phase resetting and phase locking in hybrid circuits of one model and one biological neuron. Biophysical Journal, 87, 2283–2298. CrossRef
- Ritz, R., & Sejnowski, T. (1997). Synchronous oscillatory activity in sensory systems: New vistas on mechanisms. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 536–546. CrossRef
- Sheperd, G. (1990). The synaptic organization of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Skinner, F., Zhang, L., Velazquez, P., & Carlen, P. (1999). Bursting inhibitory interneuronal networks: A role for gap-junctional coupling. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1274–1283.
- Traub, R., Kopell, N., Bibbig, A., Buhl, E. H., le Beau, F., et al. (2001). Gap junctions between interneuron dendrites can enhance synchrony of gamma oscillatios. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 9478–9486.
- vanVreeswijk, C., Abbott, L., & Ermentrout, B. (1994). When inhibition and not excitation synchronizes neural firing. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 1, 313–321. CrossRef
- Wang, X., & Rinzel, J. (1992). Alternating and synchronous rhythms in reciprocally inhibitory model neurons. Neural Computation, 4, 84–97. CrossRef
- White, A., Chow, C., Ritt, J., Trevino, C., & Kopell, N. (1998). Synchronization and oscillatory dynamics in heterogeneous, mutually inhibited neurons. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 5, 5–16. CrossRef
- Whittington, M., Traub, R., & Jefferys, J. (1995). Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Nature, 373, 612–615. CrossRef
- Wilkie, J. (2004). Numerical methods for stochastic differential equations. Physical Review E, 70, 017701. CrossRef
- Woodin, M., Ganguly, K., & Poo, M. (2003). Coincident Pre- and Postsynaptic activity modifies GABAergic synapses by postsynaptic changes in Cl Transporter activity. Neuron, 39, 807–820 CrossRef
- Ylinen, A., Bragin, A., Nadasdy, Z., Jando, G., Szabo, I., et al. (1995). Sharp wave-associated high-frequency oscillation (200 Hz) in the intact hippocampus: network and intracellular mechanisms. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 30–46.
- Zhigulin, V., Rabinovich, M., Huerta, R., & Abarbanel, H. (2003). Robustness and enhancement of neural synchronization by activity-dependent coupling. Physical Review E, 67.
- Spike timing dependent plasticity promotes synchrony of inhibitory networks in the presence of heterogeneity
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
Volume 25, Issue 2 , pp 262-281
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Inhibitory synapses
- Spike timing dependent plasticity
- Industry Sectors