Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Child and Family Team Composition on Wraparound Fidelity: Examining Links Between Team Attendance Consistency and Functioning

Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although a growing body of literature has examined wraparound implementation and fidelity, child and family team (CFT) members’ levels of participation and the consistency of their attendance have not been systematically examined. This study explored the relationship between CFT member attendance consistency and the fidelity of wraparound team level implementation processes in a System of Care (SOC). Specifically, utilizing Participant Rating Form (PRF) data collected from caregivers, facilitators, youth, supportive persons, and service providers, as well as meeting attendance records, the relationship between team attendance consistency and fidelity of wraparound implementation was explored. Records for 88 teams, with a total of 2,643 members’ ratings of CFT meetings between 2004 and 2009, were examined. Analyses indicate that the structural team factors of attendance consistency and mean team members present relate to CFT members’ ratings of team functioning and the degree to which meeting processes are consistent with the tenets of wraparound. Team attendance variables related to the views of meeting functioning by facilitators, service providers, and caregivers, the individuals most often responsible for implementation of the plan of care, but not ratings by youth or supportive persons. These findings have implications for policy and the successful implementation of wraparound, underscoring the relevance of attending to and tracking the composition of the CFT and more actively encouraging consistent meeting attendance. Results also highlight the need to measure structural variables that may have salience in fidelity and implementation assessments and, more globally, the effectiveness of SOCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barak, M. E. M., Nissly, J. A., & Levin, A. (2001). Antecedents to retention and turnover among child welfare, social work, and other human service employees: What can we learn from past research? A review and metaanalysis. Social Science Review, 75, 625–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, R. M., Suter, J. C., Bruns, E. J., & O’Rourke, K. E. (2010). Implementation literature: Building a research agenda. Journal of Child and Family Studies. http://www.springerlink.com/content/ww5631471k6nu087/fulltext.pdf.

  • Blankertz, L. E., & Robinson, S. E. (1997). Turnover intentions of community mental health workers in psychological rehabilitation services. Community Mental Health Journal, 33, 517–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Burchard, J. D., Suter, J. C., Leverentz-Brady, K., & Force, M. M. (2004). Assessing fidelity to community-based treatment for youth: The Wraparound Fidelity Index. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Suter, J. C., Force, M. M., & Burchard, J. D. (2005). Adherence to wraparound principles and association with outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 521–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Leverentz-Brady, K. M., & Walker, S. (2007). Wraparound fidelity in systems of care and association with outcomes. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Research Conference, A System of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base, Tampa, FL.

  • Bruns, E. J., Suter, J. C., & Leverentz-Brady, K. (2008). Is it wraparound yet? Setting quality standards for implementation of the wraparound process. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 35, 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. J., & Goldman, S. K. (Eds.). (1999). Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families. Systems of Care: Promising Practices in Children’s Mental Health, 1998 Series, Volume IV. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.

  • Centers for Disease Control. (2009). Developing process evaluation questions. Department of Health and Human Services. Evaluation Brief, 4, 1–2. Retrieved April 14, 2010, from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyYouth/evaluation/pdf/brief4.pdf.

  • Cook, J. R., Kilmer, R. P., DeRusso, A., Vishnevsky, T., & Meyers, D. C. (2007). Assessment of child and family team functioning using the Participant Rating Form. In C. Newman, C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), 19th Annual Research Conference Proceedings: A System of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base (pp. 317–322). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health.

  • Cook, J. R., Kilmer, R. P., Cable, E., Campbell, K., DeRusso, A., & Vishnevsky, T. (2008). Utilizing the Participant Rating Form to assess child and family team functioning and enhance wraparound fidelity. In C. Newman, C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), 20th Annual Research Conference Proceedings: A System of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base (pp. 165–170). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health.

  • Davis, C. S., & Dollard, N. (2004). Team process and adherence to wraparound principles in a children’s community mental health care system of care. Unpublished Manuscript. Child and Family Studies, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.

  • Delva, D., Jamieson, M., & Lemieux, M. (2008). Team effectiveness in academic primary health care teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22, 598–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dinnebeil, L. A., Hale, L., & Rule, S. (1999). Early intervention program practices that support collaboration. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., Nordness, P. D., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A., Schrepf, S., Benner, G., et al. (2003). Assessing the wraparound process during family planning meetings. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 30, 352–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faw, L. (1999). The state wraparound survey. In B. J. Burns & S. K. Goldman (Eds.), Systems of care: Promising practices in children’s mental health, 1998 series: Volume IV. Promising practices in wraparound for children with severe emotional disorders and their families (pp. 79–83). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blasé, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of literature. Tampa, FL: The University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P.S. & Leyden, D.P. (1991). Familiarity and group productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 578-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, M. G., Cook, J. R., Kilmer, R. P., & Hemphill, B. T. (2010). Relationships of child and family team meeting processes to initial and long-term changes in youth functioning. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Children’s Mental Health Research and Policy Conference, Tampa, FL.

  • Hemphill, B.T. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of systems of care in Mecklenburg County: Assessing the relationship between child and family team practices and youth functioning. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

  • Hemphill, B. T., Cook, J. R., & Kilmer, R. P. (2010). Child and family team meeting processes as predictors of changes in youth functioning. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Children’s Mental Health Research and Policy Conference, Tampa, FL.

  • Hernandez, M. (Ed.). (2003). Special series: Children’s mental health policy. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rast, J., & Bruns, E. (2003). Ensuring fidelity to the wraparound process. Focal Point: A national bulletin on family support and children’s mental health, 17, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances (revised edition). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, J. C., & Bruns, E. J. (2009). Effectiveness of the wraparound process for children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 12, 336–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VanDenBerg, J. E., & Grealish, E. M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. S., & Bruns, E. (2003). Quality and fidelity in wraparound. Focal Point: A national bulletin on family support and children’s mental health: Quality and fidelity in Wraparound, 17, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. S., & Schutte, K. (2003). Practices to promote effective teamwork in ISP/wraparound. Focal Point: A national bulletin on family support and children’s mental health, 17, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. S., & Schutte, K. M. (2004). Practice and process in wraparound teamwork. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 182–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. S., & Schutte, K.M. (2005). Quality and individualization in wraparound team planning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, S., Chinman, M., Ebener, P. A., Hunter, S., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2007). Getting to outcomes: 10 steps for achieving results-based accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltmann, E. M., & Whitley, R. (2007). The role of staffing stability in the implementation of integrated dual disorders treatment: An exploratory study. Journal of Mental Health, 16, 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. R., Russell, L. A., Anderson, J. A., Kooreman, H. E., & Wright, D. E. (2006). Impact of team structure on achieving treatment goals in a system of care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 240–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eylin Palamaro Munsell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palamaro Munsell, E., Cook, J.R., Kilmer, R.P. et al. The Impact of Child and Family Team Composition on Wraparound Fidelity: Examining Links Between Team Attendance Consistency and Functioning. J Child Fam Stud 20, 771–781 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9444-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9444-5

Keywords

Navigation